Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Let Experienced Pilots Fly Act (Age 67) >

Let Experienced Pilots Fly Act (Age 67)

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Let Experienced Pilots Fly Act (Age 67)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-26-2022, 10:29 AM
  #101  
All is fine at .79
 
TiredSoul's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Position: Paahlot
Posts: 4,088
Default

Same as with contract negotiations nobody over the age of 60 should have a say or a vote.
Its about out future not yours.
TiredSoul is offline  
Old 07-26-2022, 10:29 AM
  #102  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 644
Default

Originally Posted by DeadStick View Post
The House Bill will be introduced tomorrow.

Sponsors:
Lindsay Graham (R-SC)
Chip Roy (R-TX)

Cosponsors:
Clay Higgins (R-LA)
Dusty Johnson (R-SD)
Mary Miller (R-IL)
Adrian Smith (R-NE)
Lauren Boebert (R-CO)

“And to the pilot unions out there, you’re doing a disservice to the traveling public…”
-Lindsay Graham

Full Text: Let Experienced Pilots Fly Act

Sen Graham Speaks on Retirement Age

CNBC - Sen Graham Introduces Legislation

Oh Jesus, of course Boebert co-sponsored it. That's how you know it's an extra terrible idea.
Duffman is offline  
Old 07-26-2022, 10:40 AM
  #103  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 291
Default

This is a dumb solution to a self created problem. I find it interesting that if you look at the list, a lot of these senators are from places that I’d bet are mostly served by regionals and one from Colorado. That’s where Denver is, and if she doesn’t fly out of Denver, more likely regional service to Denver. I’d bet it’s personally motivated because they’re personally annoyed and frustrated at the delays.

The proposed solution, I’d bet would do almost nothing perception wise to the flying public. First, how many will actually make it to 67? Let’s say 50-75%. Ok so the problem is 50-75% less bad right? No.

All the airlines are scrambling and building schedules they can’t fill right now. Why would they stop if all the sudden they had more pilots? They’d just increase the number of flights per day and leave the same percent uncovered.

There are many many other more effective solutions to fix the perceived pilot shortage.

1. Build a schedule that you can actually accomplish. Exception being regionals when they loose huge numbers of pilots in one month to the majors.

2. The bottle neck is regionals. They are the ones with the shortage. If the majors brought the regionals into their tent, watch how fast the “problem” would get fixed. Right now, you may be able to get hired at a couple branded flying outfits right at atp mins. More likely though, you go to a regional at atp mins. You then have two options. leave after 200-500 hundred hours and go to Frontier, Spirit, Breeze, Avello, Atlas, etc. or stay for 1000-2000 hours. Either way, you stay for <1-4 years. You literally go to a regional with the intent to leave as fast as possible. When seniority is the name of the game, what motivation is there to stay at a regional?

3. How much is training backlog and spooling up because everyone’s predictions were wrong?

4. The ramp. I experience a lot of delays because of the ramp. I mentioned DEN. How many people are turned away or don’t qualify to work because of weed? Creating an actual workable regulation for weed would open up the market to many more people willing to work the ramp. This applies in more and more states. Off the top of my head, California, Colorado, Arizona, New York? Although, there are only a few tiny little hubs in those states I guess.

5. ATC modernization.

6. Non-sensical ATC covid rules. How many delays have been created for “Covid cleaning.”

7. Stupid vaccine mandate. I think it’s mostly been whittled down to purely a virtue signal at this point. But get rid of it.

This is just off the top of my head and would do more to fix the systemic issues than just raising the arbitrary age by 2 years. Which may in fact frustrate and decrease the numbers in the pipeline.

Last edited by usernamehere; 07-26-2022 at 11:04 AM.
usernamehere is offline  
Old 07-26-2022, 10:50 AM
  #104  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 595
Default

Originally Posted by av8or View Post
I’ll say this….. when the age went from 60 to 65…. FIVE years….. there wasn’t even CLOSE to this kind of rhetoric out there from those it impacted negatively…. And that was in the middle of the the housing crisis and the largest economic downturn in 50 years.
Maybe because the full realization hadn’t hit the industry yet.
Most people here have already lived the hits of stagnation, loss of pay and QOL when the people who benefited by the age 60 rule got another five years at the top.

Ford Harrison will love the discord this sees in the unions.

Age 60 - 64.9 wants this, not many others.

I’ve lived it once and looks like it’ll happen again, with predictable consequences.
Hobbit64 is offline  
Old 07-26-2022, 10:58 AM
  #105  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,318
Default

There is zero shortage at the majors. We all know that the shortage is at the regionals, and that’s impacting smaller cities like GSP where Lindsey flies out of. This 67 thing won’t change anything at the majors staffing wise. They’ll just be able to slow down the hiring. The regionals are the only ones to really gain from the change. If they were honest they would call this bill “Create stagnation for young aviators at the regionals because I don’t like driving to Charlotte Act”.
El Peso is offline  
Old 07-26-2022, 10:59 AM
  #106  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Mozam's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Position: Left
Posts: 1,189
Default

Originally Posted by usernamehere View Post
This is a dumb solution to a self created problem. I find it interesting that if you look at the list, a lot of these senators are from places that I’d bet are mostly served by regionals and one from Colorado. That’s where Denver is, and if she doesn’t fly out of Denver, more likely regional service to Denver. I’d bet it’s personally motivated because they’re personally annoyed and frustrated at the delays.

The proposed solution, I’d bet would do almost nothing perception wise to the flying public. First, how many will actually make it to 67? Let’s say 50-75%. Ok so the problem is 50-75% less bad right? No.

All the airlines are scrambling and building schedules they can’t fill right now. Why would they stop if all the sudden they had more pilots? They’d just increase the number of flights per day and leave the same percent uncovered.

There are many many other more effective solutions to fix the perceived pilot shortage.

1. Build a schedule that you can actually accomplish. Exception being regionals when they loose huge numbers of pilots in one month to the majors.

2. The bottle neck is regionals. They are the ones with the shortage. If the majors brought the regionals into their tent, watch how fast the “problem” would get fixed. Right now, you may be able to get hired at a couple branded flying outfits right at atp mins. More likely though, you go to a regional at atp mins. You then have two options. leave after 200-500 hundred hours and go to Frontier, Spirit, Breeze, Avello, Atlas, etc. or stay for 1000-2000 hours. Either way, you stay for <1-4 years. You literally go to a regional with the intent to leave as fast as possible. When seniority is the name of the game, what motivation is there to stay at a regional?

3. How much is training backlog and spooling up because everyone’s predictions were wrong?

4. The ramp. I experience a lot of delays because of the ramp. I mentioned DEN. How many people are turned away or don’t qualify to work because of weed? Creating an actual workable regulation for weed would open up the market to many more people willing to work the ramp. This applies in more and more states. Off the top of my head, California, Colorado, Arizona, New York? Although, there are only a few tiny little hubs in those states I guess.

5. ATC modernization.

6. Non-sensical ATC covid rules. How many delays have been created for “Covid cleaning.”

7. Stupid vaccine mandate. I think it’s mostly been whittled down to purely a virtue signal at this point. But get rid of it.

This is just off the top of my head and would do more to fix the systemic issues than just raising the arbitrary age by 2 years. Which may in fact frustrate and decrease the numbers in the pipeline.
I am going to have to ask you to stop bring common sense into this discussion.
Mozam is offline  
Old 07-26-2022, 11:04 AM
  #107  
It's 5 o'clock somewhere
 
Margaritaville's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2020
Posts: 1,853
Default

I'm as conservative as they come, (the Reagan brand, not this "new" Republican/Q-anon crap) but Lauren BoBo signing onto this doesn't give it much credibility. Hell why not get Marjorie Taylor Green to start talking about how Q says age 65 is a conspiracy and guns should be allowed on planes while you're at it.
Margaritaville is offline  
Old 07-26-2022, 11:05 AM
  #108  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 595
Default

Originally Posted by av8or View Post
REALLY?! Were you even in the industry the last time it changed? Hmmm..,,
I was. It sucked.
Hobbit64 is offline  
Old 07-26-2022, 12:19 PM
  #109  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: Wind checker
Posts: 763
Default

I bet the majors can’t wait to pay two more years of disability at the top seniority rate. Hell, extend it to 70.
hvydvr is offline  
Old 07-26-2022, 12:29 PM
  #110  
Speed Verified
 
Beech Dude's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,028
Default

Originally Posted by Margaritaville View Post
I'm as conservative as they come, (the Reagan brand, not this "new" Republican/Q-anon crap) but Lauren BoBo signing onto this doesn't give it much credibility. Hell why not get Marjorie Taylor Green to start talking about how Q says age 65 is a conspiracy and guns should be allowed on planes while you're at it.
Haha. Yup. Those two are clowns and make any R they're with immediately look as if they're wearing a dunce cap.
Beech Dude is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
astroglydenn
Flexjet
6
05-16-2018 03:49 AM
32LTangoTen
Regional
0
08-19-2012 01:47 PM
RPC Unity
Union Talk
149
06-30-2011 08:39 PM
BIGBROWNDC8
Cargo
7
10-22-2007 03:33 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices