Let Experienced Pilots Fly Act (Age 67)
#81
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,756
Why not tell ALPA to get off their collective asses and negotiate a mandatory pension for the pilots. ALPA wants one of them ( age 65 forced retirement ) but is to weak to demand a retirement pension plan. That would certainly help push more pilots out of your way for all you whinners out there.
#82
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: B737 FO
Posts: 665
As to the actual increase in average retirement between age 60 & 65 I would be very interested to see the actual data on that.
Assuming your numbers are correct, pre-age 65 let's say the average retirement age was 58 to account for those leaving early, so you're saying after the law changed it only rose to 60y4m average retirement age?
I find that hard to believe, especially considering how many CAs I have flown with who are 62-64. That being said I am an airline pilot not a math major.
#83
Banned
Joined APC: May 2022
Posts: 411
Can't say I disagree with you on that. ALPA is in a sad state of decline and at risk of losing UAL and DAL .
#84
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Posts: 392
Heck, one guy I flew with had to lay on his doctors table for a few minutes to make sure his blood pressure was within limits. Those days are done.
This will be a great way to retire a few years early with pay.
#85
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 925
58 years old and has no idea how to fly a crosswind takeoff. Some excellent skill from this “experienced” pilot.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/investiga...141402801.html
https://www.yahoo.com/news/investiga...141402801.html
#86
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,318
Correct me if I’m wrong here, but if 67 passes these pilots will only be able to fly domestically correct? So all these wide body folks are going to need to be retrained on a narrow body, into a domestic division status?
As if the training bottle necks haven’t been bad enough. I can see why management at the legacies are against this.
As if the training bottle necks haven’t been bad enough. I can see why management at the legacies are against this.
#87
58 years old and has no idea how to fly a crosswind takeoff. Some excellent skill from this “experienced” pilot.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/investiga...141402801.html
https://www.yahoo.com/news/investiga...141402801.html
58 year old experienced pilots shouldn’t be flying?
That seems like a heck of a leap. Experience mitigates risk and reduces mistakes, but it doesn’t eliminate them. One instance does not demonstrate a trend.
In this instance, at least they demonstrated good judgement to coordinate a RTB even before cabin reports of wing dents from passengers.
Cast the first stone, attribute it to age. Be sure to remove yourself from the pilot pool <58, as that appears meaningful to you.
#88
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 432
What exactly is the point you’re trying to make here?
58 year old experienced pilots shouldn’t be flying?
That seems like a heck of a leap. Experience mitigates risk and reduces mistakes, but it doesn’t eliminate them. One instance does not demonstrate a trend.
In this instance, at least they demonstrated good judgement to coordinate a RTB even before cabin reports of wing dents from passengers.
Cast the first stone, attribute it to age. Be sure to remove yourself from the pilot pool <58, as that appears meaningful to you.
58 year old experienced pilots shouldn’t be flying?
That seems like a heck of a leap. Experience mitigates risk and reduces mistakes, but it doesn’t eliminate them. One instance does not demonstrate a trend.
In this instance, at least they demonstrated good judgement to coordinate a RTB even before cabin reports of wing dents from passengers.
Cast the first stone, attribute it to age. Be sure to remove yourself from the pilot pool <58, as that appears meaningful to you.
#89
Not sure where you are getting your intel from, but it is showing your ignorance.
History shows this not to be true.
If he can fly a plane, then he can fly a plane. Doesn't really matter what plane he is flying as long as he is proficient.
How is "working your job" a money grab? Wow... you union thugs will say anything to get your way. Talk about childish selfishness on display.
How is "working your job" a money grab? Wow... you union thugs will say anything to get your way. Talk about childish selfishness on display.
#90
Banned
Joined APC: Jul 2021
Posts: 136
Not sure where you are getting your intel from, but it is showing your ignorance.
History shows this not to be true.
If he can fly a plane, then he can fly a plane. Doesn't really matter what plane he is flying as long as he is proficient.
How is "working your job" a money grab? Wow... you union thugs will say anything to get your way. Talk about childish selfishness on display.
History shows this not to be true.
If he can fly a plane, then he can fly a plane. Doesn't really matter what plane he is flying as long as he is proficient.
How is "working your job" a money grab? Wow... you union thugs will say anything to get your way. Talk about childish selfishness on display.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post