Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Let Experienced Pilots Fly Act (Age 67) >

Let Experienced Pilots Fly Act (Age 67)

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Let Experienced Pilots Fly Act (Age 67)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-01-2023, 08:07 PM
  #1161  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Position: B777 CA
Posts: 752
Default

Originally Posted by fcoolaiddrinker
who missed that one? Best to get that language in place so there’s no future argument no matter what happens in congress imo.
Then ALPA and the others will be subject to significant class action litigation, it’s called a duty of fair representation. ALPA is a business first run by the lawyers. No way they will ever let what you suggest happen!

Last edited by Boeing Aviator; 12-01-2023 at 08:17 PM.
Boeing Aviator is offline  
Old 12-01-2023, 08:48 PM
  #1162  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,138
Default

Originally Posted by Boeing Aviator
Then ALPA and the others will be subject to significant class action litigation, it’s called a duty of fair representation. ALPA is a business first run by the lawyers. No way they will ever let what you suggest happen!
Looks like you’re correct. According to UAL contract comparison. Sorry for the misinformation. So loa’s would need to be done if the age is raised? Is that what happened last time? It’s 65 in most agreements now. The language I mentioned seems like it would work best going forward.
fcoolaiddrinker is online now  
Old 12-01-2023, 09:53 PM
  #1163  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 2,407
Default

Originally Posted by fcoolaiddrinker
Looks like you’re correct. According to UAL contract comparison. Sorry for the misinformation. So loa’s would need to be done if the age is raised? Is that what happened last time? It’s 65 in most agreements now. The language I mentioned seems like it would work best going forward.
That would be a breach of DFR if done prior to any change by congress. The majority of the ALPA membership is against age 67.
ThumbsUp is online now  
Old 12-02-2023, 05:21 AM
  #1164  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,138
Default

Originally Posted by ThumbsUp
That would be a breach of DFR if done prior to any change by congress. The majority of the ALPA membership is against age 67.

Understood. There's no age on the faa mandated retirement age language. That’s the whole point of it. But yes I understand why alpa would be gun shy with it currently.

Last edited by fcoolaiddrinker; 12-02-2023 at 05:31 AM.
fcoolaiddrinker is online now  
Old 12-02-2023, 05:29 AM
  #1165  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Position: B777 CA
Posts: 752
Default

Originally Posted by ThumbsUp
That would be a breach of DFR if done prior to any change by congress. The majority of the ALPA membership is against age 67.
Not true no true data exists - that’s pure speculation. I have the polling done by ALPA from 2007 that shows it was close to 50/50 back during the most decade.

ALPA’s actions now will most certainly be part of significant class action lawsuits if the age doesn’t change. They are clearly supporting the younger members interests above over their most senior members. ALPA should have stayed neutral on age 67.

Most likely age 67 will happen in the next 6 months to a year. Time will tell. The part that really opens ALPA up to DFR if the retro component (pilots over 65 under 67 coming back) is part of the final Bill as it is in the House version.
Boeing Aviator is offline  
Old 12-02-2023, 05:32 AM
  #1166  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2022
Posts: 56
Default

Per a document from 2011 titled “Delta Deceased All Years” from Delta ALPA, the “average age of those deceased” pertaining to a Delta Pilot is age 66.49. If the “let experienced pilots fly act” becomes law, how does this data change your perception on working until age 67 and the safety of flying past the average age of death for a US airline pilot?
Dayzzofff is offline  
Old 12-02-2023, 05:38 AM
  #1167  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,138
Default

Originally Posted by Boeing Aviator
Not true no true data exists - that’s pure speculation. I have the polling done by ALPA from 2007 that shows it was close to 50/50 back during the most decade.

ALPA’s actions now will most certainly be part of significant class action lawsuits if the age doesn’t change. They are clearly supporting the younger members interests above over their most senior members. ALPA should have stayed neutral on age 67.

Most likely age 67 will happen in the next 6 months to a year. Time will tell. The part that really opens ALPA up to DFR if the retro component (pilots over 65 under 67 coming back) is part of the final Bill as it is in the House version.
I’ll guess the polling was done scientifically by a third party and released to membership to shield them a bit.
I can’t see them losing that lawsuit with the language I mentioned but I’m sure they would have to defend one.
fcoolaiddrinker is online now  
Old 12-02-2023, 05:49 AM
  #1168  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,138
Default

Originally Posted by Dayzzofff
Per a document from 2011 titled “Delta Deceased All Years” from Delta ALPA, the “average age of those deceased” pertaining to a Delta Pilot is age 66.49. If the “let experienced pilots fly act” becomes law, how does this data change your perception on working until age 67 and the safety of flying past the average age of death for a US airline pilot?
Good point. Personally my care level on it is a bit low hoping it stays 65. I just seems like a colossal waste of time to ratify several agreements and more than likely then have to go back and do a bunch of loa’s. Like others have mentioned it did keep insurance costs down during negotiations.
fcoolaiddrinker is online now  
Old 12-02-2023, 05:50 AM
  #1169  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,387
Default

Originally Posted by Dayzzofff
Per a document from 2011 titled “Delta Deceased All Years” from Delta ALPA, the “average age of those deceased” pertaining to a Delta Pilot is age 66.49. If the “let experienced pilots fly act” becomes law, how does this data change your perception on working until age 67 and the safety of flying past the average age of death for a US airline pilot?
Can you produce a source for this document? Delta ALPA says it never did any study.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 12-02-2023, 05:57 AM
  #1170  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,544
Default

Originally Posted by Boeing Aviator
Then ALPA and the others will be subject to significant class action litigation, it’s called a duty of fair representation. ALPA is a business first run by the lawyers. No way they will ever let what you suggest happen!
I think he was suggesting that the few who have LTD capped at age 65 should change their language to FAA Retirement Age.

But you are correct that unions generally cannot intentionally limit benefits by age, for those over age 40 per federal law. So you cannot for example mandate age 65 retirement in the CBA.
rickair7777 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
astroglydenn
Flexjet
6
05-16-2018 03:49 AM
32LTangoTen
Regional
0
08-19-2012 01:47 PM
RPC Unity
Union Talk
149
06-30-2011 08:39 PM
BIGBROWNDC8
Cargo
7
10-22-2007 03:33 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices