Let Experienced Pilots Fly Act (Age 67)
#221
Congress people from areas hit by reductions in regional service may support age 67...
https://qctimes.com/news/state-and-r...e46c75163.html
https://qctimes.com/news/state-and-r...e46c75163.html
#222
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,100
I wouldn't be so sure. It's a GOP bill, every sponsor is GOP, and the unions don't want it. ALPA has made it clear their goal is to kill off the regionals once and for all, and this is their chance. Dems listen to the unions. That's why they pushed back on the CARES Act to get legislation that ensured the airlines couldn't furlough employees in exchange for the bailout, whereas GOP tried to gut airline Payroll Support Program during the pandemic. https://www.alpa.org/advocacy/cta/co...-pilot-summary
GOP is NOT union or labor friendly and this is a GOP bill. I think politics might help us for a change.
GOP is NOT union or labor friendly and this is a GOP bill. I think politics might help us for a change.
They just allowed the wholly owned carriers to give AA a lifeline to save the regionals and accept temporary pay rates that will be rescinded as soon as AA wants.
#223
I wouldn't be so sure. It's a GOP bill, every sponsor is GOP, and the unions don't want it. ALPA has made it clear their goal is to kill off the regionals once and for all, and this is their chance. Dems listen to the unions. That's why they pushed back on the CARES Act to get legislation that ensured the airlines couldn't furlough employees in exchange for the bailout, whereas GOP tried to gut airline Payroll Support Program during the pandemic. https://www.alpa.org/advocacy/cta/co...-pilot-summary
GOP is NOT union or labor friendly and this is a GOP bill. I think politics might help us for a change.
GOP is NOT union or labor friendly and this is a GOP bill. I think politics might help us for a change.
They don't love airline unions quite that much. Under the current regulatory structure, .gov cannot *force* the airlines to bring RJ's in house, or to serve specific destinations. That was all pre-1979.
So the apparent practical political path is to somehow try to keep the regionals alive.
#224
There is no fix to anything-just adapt to the problems and keep it on you. You wanna go out at 55, go, if a guy wants to fly till 70, let him.
Ill never fly past 65, but whining about what little seniority this costs is a waste of time.
Hypocrisy abounds from all angles here.
Ill never fly past 65, but whining about what little seniority this costs is a waste of time.
Hypocrisy abounds from all angles here.
#225
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,716
There is no fix to anything-just adapt to the problems and keep it on you. You wanna go out at 55, go, if a guy wants to fly till 70, let him.
Ill never fly past 65, but whining about what little seniority this costs is a waste of time.
Hypocrisy abounds from all angles here.
Ill never fly past 65, but whining about what little seniority this costs is a waste of time.
Hypocrisy abounds from all angles here.
that wasn’t my quote
#226
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 432
There is no fix to anything-just adapt to the problems and keep it on you. You wanna go out at 55, go, if a guy wants to fly till 70, let him.
Ill never fly past 65, but whining about what little seniority this costs is a waste of time.
Hypocrisy abounds from all angles here.
Ill never fly past 65, but whining about what little seniority this costs is a waste of time.
Hypocrisy abounds from all angles here.
The stagnation is whatever. Can’t control Congress. I don’t like it but I won’t whine about people staying as long as they are still all there mentally.
#227
RAA who's member airlines are losing manpower to the majors. ALPA has historically had a "NO" policy to get a seat a the table, this strategy may backfire this time. If congress musters the will and believes it benefits the traveling public, pilots are just along for the ride. Watch the aviation subcommittee hearings to see who actually gets to testify, that I believe will be all telling.
#228
I think what you're whining about is a potential two year stagnation in career progression which no doubt would happen, but, that would affect everyone equally. No?
#229
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,897
Nothing would happen to your seniority if the retirement age changed. Those below you on the list would remain below you (junior) those above you on the list would remain above you (senior). Nothing changes there. And BTW, "older and junior to you" classic!
I think what you're whining about is a potential two year stagnation in career progression which no doubt would happen, but, that would affect everyone equally. No?
I think what you're whining about is a potential two year stagnation in career progression which no doubt would happen, but, that would affect everyone equally. No?
#230
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 432
Nothing would happen to your seniority if the retirement age changed. Those below you on the list would remain below you (junior) those above you on the list would remain above you (senior). Nothing changes there. And BTW, "older and junior to you" classic!
I think what you're whining about is a potential two year stagnation in career progression which no doubt would happen, but, that would affect everyone equally. No?
I think what you're whining about is a potential two year stagnation in career progression which no doubt would happen, but, that would affect everyone equally. No?
what happens if, theoretically, WB is junior to NB? Will I get displaced off a NB fleet so a 66 year old junior to me can take it? Will they get furloughed if there aren’t any NB spots available?
PBS will steal my domestic trips to fill out their schedule.
I truly don’t really care about the stagnation. It’s not something we can control. Moving up and down on the list due to reasons I have no control over is something I accepted the day I decided to get into this profession. What I do care about is getting into a career where seniority is god and then watching people leapfrog me solely because they’re too old to fulfill the job as advertised (try getting hired as a pilot at a legacy if you can’t legally work outside of the US) and need an accommodation at my seniority expense.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post