Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Let Experienced Pilots Fly Act (Age 67) >

Let Experienced Pilots Fly Act (Age 67)

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Let Experienced Pilots Fly Act (Age 67)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-29-2022, 11:14 AM
  #221  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,487
Default

Congress people from areas hit by reductions in regional service may support age 67...

https://qctimes.com/news/state-and-r...e46c75163.html
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 07-29-2022, 12:12 PM
  #222  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,100
Default

Originally Posted by Duffman View Post
I wouldn't be so sure. It's a GOP bill, every sponsor is GOP, and the unions don't want it. ALPA has made it clear their goal is to kill off the regionals once and for all, and this is their chance. Dems listen to the unions. That's why they pushed back on the CARES Act to get legislation that ensured the airlines couldn't furlough employees in exchange for the bailout, whereas GOP tried to gut airline Payroll Support Program during the pandemic. https://www.alpa.org/advocacy/cta/co...-pilot-summary
GOP is NOT union or labor friendly and this is a GOP bill. I think politics might help us for a change.
Small but important fact check: ALPA has not made it clear that killing off the regionals "once and for all"

They just allowed the wholly owned carriers to give AA a lifeline to save the regionals and accept temporary pay rates that will be rescinded as soon as AA wants.
threeighteen is offline  
Old 07-29-2022, 12:40 PM
  #223  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,487
Default

Originally Posted by Duffman View Post
I wouldn't be so sure. It's a GOP bill, every sponsor is GOP, and the unions don't want it. ALPA has made it clear their goal is to kill off the regionals once and for all, and this is their chance. Dems listen to the unions. That's why they pushed back on the CARES Act to get legislation that ensured the airlines couldn't furlough employees in exchange for the bailout, whereas GOP tried to gut airline Payroll Support Program during the pandemic. https://www.alpa.org/advocacy/cta/co...-pilot-summary
GOP is NOT union or labor friendly and this is a GOP bill. I think politics might help us for a change.
Killing off the regionals, and ending air service to hundreds of small/medium sized communities, is not going to be a good look for any politician, of any stripe.

They don't love airline unions quite that much. Under the current regulatory structure, .gov cannot *force* the airlines to bring RJ's in house, or to serve specific destinations. That was all pre-1979.

So the apparent practical political path is to somehow try to keep the regionals alive.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 07-29-2022, 02:36 PM
  #224  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Bozo the pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2013
Posts: 2,594
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff View Post
hard facts like “millennials should just buck up and fix it?”
There is no fix to anything-just adapt to the problems and keep it on you. You wanna go out at 55, go, if a guy wants to fly till 70, let him.
Ill never fly past 65, but whining about what little seniority this costs is a waste of time.
Hypocrisy abounds from all angles here.
Bozo the pilot is offline  
Old 07-29-2022, 03:14 PM
  #225  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,716
Default

Originally Posted by Bozo the pilot View Post
There is no fix to anything-just adapt to the problems and keep it on you. You wanna go out at 55, go, if a guy wants to fly till 70, let him.
Ill never fly past 65, but whining about what little seniority this costs is a waste of time.
Hypocrisy abounds from all angles here.
take it up with the person who suggested millennials and genZ say, "We're going to fix this, so future generations won't suffer the same fate, even though I'll personally never see it."

that wasn’t my quote
OOfff is offline  
Old 07-29-2022, 03:56 PM
  #226  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 432
Default

Originally Posted by Bozo the pilot View Post
There is no fix to anything-just adapt to the problems and keep it on you. You wanna go out at 55, go, if a guy wants to fly till 70, let him.
Ill never fly past 65, but whining about what little seniority this costs is a waste of time.
Hypocrisy abounds from all angles here.
There are roughly 1500 pilots junior and older than me. That is not a little seniority when it comes to bidding. I have no issue with the people senior to me as long as they have all their marbles, I have a huge issue with my seniority being abrogated by the people older and junior to me.

The stagnation is whatever. Can’t control Congress. I don’t like it but I won’t whine about people staying as long as they are still all there mentally.
01110011 is offline  
Old 07-29-2022, 04:03 PM
  #227  
Gets Weekends Off
 
awax's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,807
Default

Originally Posted by Voski View Post
The real question is: who is lobbying for this?

RAA who's member airlines are losing manpower to the majors. ALPA has historically had a "NO" policy to get a seat a the table, this strategy may backfire this time. If congress musters the will and believes it benefits the traveling public, pilots are just along for the ride. Watch the aviation subcommittee hearings to see who actually gets to testify, that I believe will be all telling.
awax is offline  
Old 07-29-2022, 04:26 PM
  #228  
Gets Weekends Off
 
awax's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,807
Default

Originally Posted by 01110011 View Post
I have a huge issue with my seniority being abrogated by the people older and junior to me.
Nothing would happen to your seniority if the retirement age changed. Those below you on the list would remain below you (junior) those above you on the list would remain above you (senior). Nothing changes there. And BTW, "older and junior to you" classic!

I think what you're whining about is a potential two year stagnation in career progression which no doubt would happen, but, that would affect everyone equally. No?
awax is offline  
Old 07-29-2022, 04:37 PM
  #229  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,897
Default

Originally Posted by awax View Post
Nothing would happen to your seniority if the retirement age changed. Those below you on the list would remain below you (junior) those above you on the list would remain above you (senior). Nothing changes there. And BTW, "older and junior to you" classic!

I think what you're whining about is a potential two year stagnation in career progression which no doubt would happen, but, that would affect everyone equally. No?
no, it benefits those who are already in their final airline/base/aircraft/seat/bidding%. So they get an extra 2 years there. The guys behind him waiting to get to that same spot will be delayed Time value of money lost from that delayed upgrade or off reserve. Being told to work two more years past 65 to make up for it. Unable to move to home base. Not getting that vacation slot. Not getting the trips you want. Not getting hired at the majors(not as terrible now at American eagle…)
AllYourBaseAreB is offline  
Old 07-29-2022, 04:43 PM
  #230  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 432
Default

Originally Posted by awax View Post
Nothing would happen to your seniority if the retirement age changed. Those below you on the list would remain below you (junior) those above you on the list would remain above you (senior). Nothing changes there. And BTW, "older and junior to you" classic!

I think what you're whining about is a potential two year stagnation in career progression which no doubt would happen, but, that would affect everyone equally. No?
Only snag with your snarky response is that ICAO hasn’t raised the age. What happens to the 66 year old widebody captains that can’t do international trips anymore? The 66 year old Airbus or 73 FO that can’t do Canada? What happens when a Canada trips goes into open time and they get skipped (and a bonus day at home) because they can’t fly it and it goes to someone senior and younger than them?

what happens if, theoretically, WB is junior to NB? Will I get displaced off a NB fleet so a 66 year old junior to me can take it? Will they get furloughed if there aren’t any NB spots available?

PBS will steal my domestic trips to fill out their schedule.

I truly don’t really care about the stagnation. It’s not something we can control. Moving up and down on the list due to reasons I have no control over is something I accepted the day I decided to get into this profession. What I do care about is getting into a career where seniority is god and then watching people leapfrog me solely because they’re too old to fulfill the job as advertised (try getting hired as a pilot at a legacy if you can’t legally work outside of the US) and need an accommodation at my seniority expense.
01110011 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
astroglydenn
Flexjet
6
05-16-2018 03:49 AM
32LTangoTen
Regional
0
08-19-2012 01:47 PM
RPC Unity
Union Talk
149
06-30-2011 08:39 PM
BIGBROWNDC8
Cargo
7
10-22-2007 03:33 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices