US house panel votes in age [67]
#571
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,882
Likes: 681
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
I'm not a boomer, and won't need the money. I'm agnostic on this thing but I don't think there's much we can do about it at this point anyway. Pols may not know much about aviation but, like everybody else, they do know people who are 65, and 67, and most of them still work especially in white collar. They just don't see the catastrophic drop in cog performance in the 60s. They see right through the self-serving position of most pilot groups, and so they don't really take us seriously on the topic.
But I am thankful that I mostly enjoy what I do (it's a job after all, I don't expect it to be a complete vacation). I kind of feel bad for someone trapped in the airline industry who actually doesn't like it. Or is that just hip posturing on the part of youth?
But I am thankful that I mostly enjoy what I do (it's a job after all, I don't expect it to be a complete vacation). I kind of feel bad for someone trapped in the airline industry who actually doesn't like it. Or is that just hip posturing on the part of youth?
#572
On Reserve
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
A vast majority of airline pilots never make it to 65 nonetheless 67. They medical out, die, on LTD or retire early. What makes you think the 20% that decide to work until 67 are going to affect your seniority much? With the mass retirements coming up, it won't affect you as much as you think it will (like age 65 did as it was a different pilot market then with furloughs, hard to make it to a major airline, etc).
Have you seen the latest stats for the amount of pilots needed for the future? It's staggering. Not enough pilots for the increased demand worldwide. As one who hopes to retire at 65, it would be helpful to at least have a choice for another 2 years, depending on the stock market. I never made it to the $300,000 year pilot job throughout my career.
Every pilot ages differently. Some have cognitive issues, some do not. That's what the simulator evaluation is for. Geez. You all will be older someday. And you might change your mind. 65 is the new 45.
We take better care of ourselves (especially pilots with a medical every 6 months when you get older). We are living longer. Don't be so quick to only think of your younger self. It's about thinking of what's best for everyone. Being unionized, it's thinking of everyone to at least have a choice, not just a segment of the pilot ranks. Social security full retirement age isn't even until 67 now. Best to at least have the option. You can fly corporate after 65. So I don't see much of a difference as I've done both.
Have you seen the latest stats for the amount of pilots needed for the future? It's staggering. Not enough pilots for the increased demand worldwide. As one who hopes to retire at 65, it would be helpful to at least have a choice for another 2 years, depending on the stock market. I never made it to the $300,000 year pilot job throughout my career.
Every pilot ages differently. Some have cognitive issues, some do not. That's what the simulator evaluation is for. Geez. You all will be older someday. And you might change your mind. 65 is the new 45.
We take better care of ourselves (especially pilots with a medical every 6 months when you get older). We are living longer. Don't be so quick to only think of your younger self. It's about thinking of what's best for everyone. Being unionized, it's thinking of everyone to at least have a choice, not just a segment of the pilot ranks. Social security full retirement age isn't even until 67 now. Best to at least have the option. You can fly corporate after 65. So I don't see much of a difference as I've done both.
Last edited by miapilot; 07-26-2023 at 12:57 PM.
#573
On Reserve
Joined: Apr 2022
Posts: 109
Likes: 2
A vast majority of airline pilots never make it to 65 nonetheless 67. They medical out, die, on LTD or retire early. What makes you think the 20% that decide to work until 67 are going to affect your seniority much? With the mass retirements coming up, it won't affect you as much as you think it will (like age 65 did as it was a different pilot market then with furloughs, hard to make it to a major airline, etc).
Have you seen the latest stats for the amount of pilots needed for the future? It's staggering. Not enough pilots for the increased demand worldwide. As one who hopes to retire at 65, it would be helpful to at least have a choice for another 2 years, depending on the stock market. I never made it to the $300,000 year pilot job throughout my career.
Every pilot ages differently. Some have cognitive issues, some do not. That's what the simulator evaluation is for. Geez. You all will be older someday. And you might change your mind. 65 is the new 45.
We take better care of ourselves (especially pilots with a medical every 6 months when you get older). We are living longer. Don't be so quick to only think of your younger self. It's about thinking of what's best for everyone. Being unionized, it's thinking of everyone to at least have a choice, not just a segment of the pilot ranks. Social security full retirement age isn't even until 67 now. Best to at least have the option. You can fly corporate after 65. So I don't see much of a difference as I've done both.
Have you seen the latest stats for the amount of pilots needed for the future? It's staggering. Not enough pilots for the increased demand worldwide. As one who hopes to retire at 65, it would be helpful to at least have a choice for another 2 years, depending on the stock market. I never made it to the $300,000 year pilot job throughout my career.
Every pilot ages differently. Some have cognitive issues, some do not. That's what the simulator evaluation is for. Geez. You all will be older someday. And you might change your mind. 65 is the new 45.
We take better care of ourselves (especially pilots with a medical every 6 months when you get older). We are living longer. Don't be so quick to only think of your younger self. It's about thinking of what's best for everyone. Being unionized, it's thinking of everyone to at least have a choice, not just a segment of the pilot ranks. Social security full retirement age isn't even until 67 now. Best to at least have the option. You can fly corporate after 65. So I don't see much of a difference as I've done both.
I agree whole heartedly, great summarization. Lifespans and longer healthy cognitive years are about to increase exponentially mark my words. The current LTD statistics of all airlines represent generational factors that include smoking, poor food options in the airports, no rest rules, more alcoholism and not enough emphasis on exercise. Once this generational demographic moves on I believe we will see less impact disability wise and lower early mortality. In 10 years the statistics will be vastly different.
#575
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 226
Likes: 50
I'll play devil's advocate with you.
Age 60 was arbitrary. Age 65 was arbitrary. Age 67 is also arbitrary. Where's your "data or science" (as though those are highly regarded or at all reliable in a highly politicized post-Covid world...) that supports any given fixed retirement age at all?
Age 60 was arbitrary. Age 65 was arbitrary. Age 67 is also arbitrary. Where's your "data or science" (as though those are highly regarded or at all reliable in a highly politicized post-Covid world...) that supports any given fixed retirement age at all?
#576
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
What was the study done to raise the age from 60 to 65?
Has anyone who has recommended 'studying it' actually proposed how to conduct such a study?
This looks like another post to make the poster feel better by proposing unworkable solutions.
#577
On Reserve
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 85
Likes: 1
From: Upside Down
How do propose 'studying it'? And can you cite any studies in the past for any pilot age group?
What was the study done to raise the age from 60 to 65?
Has anyone who has recommended 'studying it' actually proposed how to conduct such a study?
This looks like another post to make the poster feel better by proposing unworkable solutions.
What was the study done to raise the age from 60 to 65?
Has anyone who has recommended 'studying it' actually proposed how to conduct such a study?
This looks like another post to make the poster feel better by proposing unworkable solutions.
No one (including ALPA) is offering any solutions. They are simply saying “we need to study it.” Unfortunately, they know there are no ways to truly study cognitive decline in individuals because each of us are uniquely different. Furthermore, we will all decline at different rates. That is why we have flight physicals every six months. Our FAA certified doctors are supposed to be the gatekeepers on keeping unhealthy folks from flying. And why we have check rides every nine months.
I’ve said this numerous times in the past, I believe Congress will act on this because it shows they are doing something to address an issue.
#578
We’ve been to the moon and to the bottom of the ocean. Figured out how to fly at hypersonic speeds and thermodynamic flow theory… I’m pretty sure we can figure out how to come up with a study and a data set to make an informed decision on a Pilot’s retirement age. Certainly more informed than the completely uninformed and arbitrary method many of you are currently advocating for.
#579
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,480
Likes: 1,051
We’ve been to the moon and to the bottom of the ocean. Figured out how to fly at hypersonic speeds and thermodynamic flow theory… I’m pretty sure we can figure out how to come up with a study and a data set to make an informed decision on a Pilot’s retirement age. Certainly more informed than the completely uninformed and arbitrary method many of you are currently advocating for.
#580
In a land of unicorns
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 7,045
Likes: 63
From: Whale FO
65 was studied extensively. Do your homework.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



