Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
US house panel votes in age [67] >

US house panel votes in age [67]

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

US house panel votes in age [67]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-20-2023 | 10:55 AM
  #471  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2023
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
Default

What will the financial implications be to a 64 1/2 year old pilot be to sill leave at 65 (with the age limit raised to 67) versus if they were forced to retire with an age 65 mandate?
Reply
Old 07-20-2023 | 11:17 AM
  #472  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Apr 2022
Posts: 109
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
Unbelievable. Greedy ****ing *******s. You already got an extra 5 years at my expense. Now you want another 2 years. Every time the retirement age is raised, the seniority list is virtually frozen for 2 years. You get your extra 2 years at whatever seat and seniority you are currently in. 67 year olds should not be flying airplanes. This nonsense has gone on long enough.


Don’t kid yourself. There are widebody captains with no life pushing to not retire. Greedy ****s.

Go ahead and retire. Wouldn’t you make more playing for the Red Wings or Penguins anyways. A career change may save you from a heart attack or stroke as evidenced by angry rant above. We care about your health here at APC you do believe that don’t you.
Reply
Old 07-20-2023 | 11:48 AM
  #473  
Nucflash's Avatar
Orbis Non Sufficit
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 788
Likes: 10
Default

If one is going to dispute rumors (or support rumors) one must go to the SOURCE. Here is the unequivocal SOURCE. Let’s put the “ALPA is lying” conspiracy theories to rest.

NEHLS AMENDMENT

Read **PAGE 7** above. How this is going down is that **NEHLS** offered an amendment to HR 3935, the FAA Reauthorization Bill. That is TRUE.

The standalone bills in the House and Senate are basically intended to smokescreen the process and to promote the PR campaign (Graham’s press conference, etc). They don’t have a chance. Clearly, it is MUCH more simple to tack something like this on to a more important bill of massive proportion than to pass it in both houses and have it signed by Biden as a standalone.

Now, it just so happens that there is a very senior Delta pilot with the same last name who lives just outside Houston, in the same town in which Congressman Nehls lives, which is in the same county where Nehls was formerly the sheriff. That is also TRUE. Coincidence? I’m certainly not going to post personal information here; you can source that for yourselves.
Reply
Old 07-20-2023 | 12:08 PM
  #474  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by Nucflash
If one is going to dispute rumors (or support rumors) one must go to the SOURCE. Here is the unequivocal SOURCE. Let’s put the “ALPA is lying” conspiracy theories to rest.

NEHLS AMENDMENT

Read **PAGE 7** above. How this is going down is that **NEHLS** offered an amendment to HR 3935, the FAA Reauthorization Bill. That is TRUE.

The standalone bills in the House and Senate are basically intended to smokescreen the process and to promote the PR campaign (Graham’s press conference, etc). They don’t have a chance. Clearly, it is MUCH more simple to tack something like this on to a more important bill of massive proportion than to pass it in both houses and have it signed by Biden as a standalone.

Now, it just so happens that there is a very senior Delta pilot with the same last name who lives just outside Houston, in the same town in which Congressman Nehls lives, which is in the same county where Nehls was formerly the sheriff. That is also TRUE. Coincidence? I’m certainly not going to post personal information here; you can source that for yourselves.
Again, that amendment's origin dates back to the 117th Congress.
As for tacking a bill on a larger bill as an amendment, that's pretty standard operating procedure in DC. It may be considered nefarious, but that's how the sausage is made in DC.
Do you have a quote from ALPA saying that Nehls did this because his brother is a WB CA? I haven't seen any statements from ALPA, just statements from individuals who oppose the change, attributing the origin of this to Nehls.

Pointed question for you to answer: Are you stating that Nehls is the origin of this proposed age change? Simple yes or no.
Reply
Old 07-20-2023 | 12:25 PM
  #475  
CanoeBum's Avatar
PermaFO
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: May I swing the gear Von Admiral?
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
Again, that amendment's origin dates back to the 117th Congress.
As for tacking a bill on a larger bill as an amendment, that's pretty standard operating procedure in DC. It may be considered nefarious, but that's how the sausage is made in DC.
Do you have a quote from ALPA saying that Nehls did this because his brother is a WB CA? I haven't seen any statements from ALPA, just statements from individuals who oppose the change, attributing the origin of this to Nehls.

Pointed question for you to answer: Are you stating that Nehls is the origin of this proposed age change? Simple yes or no.
“Congress is also at odds over raising the mandatory pilot retirement age from 65 to 67, a change sought by Representative Troy Nehls, Republican of Texas, whose brother is an airline pilot about to turn 65, and championed by Speaker Kevin McCarthy. The offices of Mr. Nehls and Mr. McCarthy did not respond to requests for comment.”

The New York Times
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/20/u...-congress.html
Reply
Old 07-20-2023 | 12:42 PM
  #476  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by CanoeBum
“Congress is also at odds over raising the mandatory pilot retirement age from 65 to 67, a change sought by Representative Troy Nehls, Republican of Texas, whose brother is an airline pilot about to turn 65, and championed by Speaker Kevin McCarthy. The offices of Mr. Nehls and Mr. McCarthy did not respond to requests for comment.”

The New York Times
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/20/u...-congress.html
NY Times, is not ALPA.
Reply
Old 07-20-2023 | 12:46 PM
  #477  
Nucflash's Avatar
Orbis Non Sufficit
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 788
Likes: 10
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
Again, that amendment's origin dates back to the 117th Congress.
I wasn’t concerned with any specific congress; just what’s been coming to a head the last few months. I’m sure the idea for 65++ has been in people’s heads since the day 65 passed in ‘07.

As for tacking a bill on a larger bill as an amendment, that's pretty standard operating procedure in DC. It may be considered nefarious, but that's how the sausage is made in DC.
Agree; no dispute. But you generally get more hype for an idea with a standalone bill with a fancy name while amendments tend to get buried in committee briefs.

Do you have a quote from ALPA saying that Nehls did this because his brother is a WB CA? I haven't seen any statements from ALPA, just statements from individuals who oppose the change, attributing the origin of this to Nehls.
Ambrosi’s update of 17 July alluded to it.

Pointed question for you to answer: Are you stating that Nehls is the origin of this proposed age change? Simple yes or no.
It’s absolutely not politically driven, if that’s what you are asking. Just by people who can’t give it up. Hoot Gibson would be flying at SWA to this day if he still could.
Reply
Old 07-20-2023 | 01:03 PM
  #478  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by Nucflash
I wasn’t concerned with any specific congress; just what’s been coming to a head the last few months. I’m sure the idea for 65++ has been in people’s heads since the day 65 passed in ‘07.
Agree; no dispute. But you generally get more hype for an idea with a standalone bill with a fancy name while amendments tend to get buried in committee briefs.
Ambrosi’s update of 17 July alluded to it.
It’s absolutely not politically driven, if that’s what you are asking. Just by people who can’t give it up. Hoot Gibson would be flying at SWA to this day if he still could.
Ah, yes, this:
The proposal, which is being pushed by a lawmaker whose goal appears to be granting favor to a family member, risks the U.S. airline industry economic recovery that you and other ALPA members worked so hard to achieve.

I would call that a major faux pas. Nehls is on the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. That statement likely got back to Nehls through his brother since his brother received that blast email.
Making an enemy on an important committee that your industry relies on doesn't seem very intelligent.


All of those amendments that you listed above (labeled NEHLS AMENDMENT by you) were by members of the T&I Committee. That's the process. Committee members propose amendments. Ambrosi knows that, or should know that. I can't believe that was allowed to be sent out with that statement. Unbelievable.
Reply
Old 07-20-2023 | 01:12 PM
  #479  
Nucflash's Avatar
Orbis Non Sufficit
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 788
Likes: 10
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
All of those amendments that you listed above (labeled NEHLS AMENDMENT by you) were by members of the T&I Committee. That's the process. Committee members propose amendments. Ambrosi knows that, or should know that. I can't believe that was allowed to be sent out with that statement. Unbelievable.
I wasn’t referring to the entire laundry list of amendments to the bill, just this one in particular, which was proposed by Nehls.

He’s certainly been running a victory lap over what he himself is referring to as “his” amendment; see for yourself.

http://nehls.house.gov/media/press-r...retirement-age
Reply
Old 07-20-2023 | 01:20 PM
  #480  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by Nucflash
I wasn’t referring to the entire laundry list of amendments to the bill, just this one in particular, which was proposed by Nehls.

He’s certainly been running a victory lap over “his” amendment; again, see for yourself.

http://nehls.house.gov/media/press-r...retirement-age
I understood that about the list of amendments. I've read a lot of these amandments on a variety of topics over the years.

I think you'll find the same on every Rep's page for amendments that were added. Pretty standard DC stuff.

For what it's worth, had Nehls not added it as an amendment, there would have been several others on the T&I Committee who would have done so.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
STEAMROLLER
Major
355
04-04-2023 09:15 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices