Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
US house panel votes in age [67] >

US house panel votes in age [67]

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

US house panel votes in age [67]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-20-2023 | 08:44 PM
  #491  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 5,529
Likes: 197
From: UNA
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
How do you do that legally? It wouldn't hold up to any legal challenge.

The FAA, in defense of the regionals and bottom feeders, has long held that all 121 operators are held to a common standard. They can't exactly set a lower standard based on the economic situation. Not that it would hold up in court anyway.
If the airline is engaged in part 121 operations outside the US and Canada, the lower of age 67 or the ICAO mandatory retirements age shall be considered the mandatory retirement age for any pilot at that airline. If the airline operates solely within the United States and Canada, a pilot may serve until they turn 67

pretty sure regionals pretty much only fly to US/Canada/Mexico. (Add Mexico to the above if they also don’t have a retirement age like Canada). other than allegiant, this would pretty much separate regionals from majors without explicitly creating a different rule for them. Also would solve the issue of pilots over 65 flying for international carriers like UA, AA and DL.

Last edited by Gone Flying; 07-20-2023 at 08:59 PM.
Reply
Old 07-21-2023 | 05:06 AM
  #492  
symbian simian's Avatar
Line holder
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,167
Likes: 226
From: Aircraft & Seat: old & hard
Default

Originally Posted by ClownDown
Who wants to fly past 60? Sorry 2 ex wives and poor financial planning left you with no retirement but it’s time to move on.
Started in 1990. Same wife since 1998. Always had a job, but didn't make 6 figures till 2016. No, not a problem child, never failed a check ride, got hired after pretty much every interview I managed to get. 10 years to go. I waited for another 5, you can wait for another 2.
Reply
Old 07-21-2023 | 05:26 AM
  #493  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,882
Likes: 682
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Gone Flying
If the airline is engaged in part 121 operations outside the US and Canada, the lower of age 67 or the ICAO mandatory retirements age shall be considered the mandatory retirement age for any pilot at that airline. If the airline operates solely within the United States and Canada, a pilot may serve until they turn 67

pretty sure regionals pretty much only fly to US/Canada/Mexico. (Add Mexico to the above if they also don’t have a retirement age like Canada). other than allegiant, this would pretty much separate regionals from majors without explicitly creating a different rule for them. Also would solve the issue of pilots over 65 flying for international carriers like UA, AA and DL.
You could probably do that if it's distinct by fleet, not airline and maybe set a threshold like 90% domestic, to prevent airlines from operating one flight annually on Jan 1st between SAN and TIJ as a pretext to get rid of all 65+.

The current language in the bill does not address how airlines are to handle pilots who are too old for international ops and that's a can of worms anyway. Congress really needs to get the airlines some guardrails on that.
Reply
Old 07-21-2023 | 05:33 AM
  #494  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,882
Likes: 682
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by symbian simian
Started in 1990. Same wife since 1998. Always had a job, but didn't make 6 figures till 2016. No, not a problem child, never failed a check ride, got hired after pretty much every interview I managed to get. 10 years to go. I waited for another 5, you can wait for another 2.
I'm Lost Gen, would be in about the same boat if not for outside employment, investments, and wife's job. No airline pension, and regional 401k was a joke for all of my tenure. I can see how many in my demographic could prefer to work longer.

With 20/20 hindsight, I could have chased every ACMI and 3rd tier startup to climb the ladder faster, but that wasn't conducive to family life.
Reply
Old 07-21-2023 | 05:58 AM
  #495  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,372
Likes: 358
Default

Originally Posted by symbian simian
Started in 1990. Same wife since 1998. Always had a job, but didn't make 6 figures till 2016. No, not a problem child, never failed a check ride, got hired after pretty much every interview I managed to get. 10 years to go. I waited for another 5, you can wait for another 2.
How if you’re a 1990s hire did you not make above 6 figures until 2016? You mean 1990 started flying? Started at the airline? Started at a legacy?
Reply
Old 07-21-2023 | 06:00 AM
  #496  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
WHOA! You never stated 118th Congress. You stated that Nehls first introduced it in Congress.
Everyone familiar with this issue should know that it was first introduced in the 117th Congress. And hopefully most people know that unpassed bills die at the end of each Congress. The bills I referenced died at the end of the 117th Congress.
It is typical for bills that die in one session of Congress to be reintroduced in the next session. You seem to be suggesting that Nehls is the 'mastermind' of this legislation. I spent more than a couple of minutes posting the origin of this change.If you have proof to the contrary, post it rather than making baseless accusations.
I could care less what happened in the previous congress. I, and others, are only interested in what’s happening now. The origin of what’s happening now was Nehl’s last minute amendment in the T&I committee. I shouldn’t have to qualify “in Congress” with “in the present Congress”.

There’s nothing baseless to my accusations: Nehl proposed age 67 in committee which is the first attempt to do so in this congress.
Reply
Old 07-21-2023 | 06:07 AM
  #497  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Andy

For what it's worth, had Nehls not added it as an amendment, there would have been several others on the T&I Committee who would have done so.
Perhaps but how many of those members had a possible conflict of interest with a family member nearing retirement? He’s not very smart - if there were so many other committee members chomping at the bit to propose this, then why not let them and avoid the accusations of cronyism?
Reply
Old 07-21-2023 | 06:14 AM
  #498  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 5,529
Likes: 197
From: UNA
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
You could probably do that if it's distinct by fleet, not airline and maybe set a threshold like 90% domestic, to prevent airlines from operating one flight annually on Jan 1st between SAN and TIJ as a pretext to get rid of all 65+.

The current language in the bill does not address how airlines are to handle pilots who are too old for international ops and that's a can of worms anyway. Congress really needs to get the airlines some guardrails on that.
why by fleet? If the airline is a global airline they should be able to require all their pilots fly globally. If I am a 220 CA would I be able to be displaced out of my seat because someone senior turned 65. what if they are junior to me? That would be a major change to how seniority runs things at my airline. What if all of a sudden we start flying the 220 to the Caribbean, then what for those 65 year old pilots?

Last edited by Gone Flying; 07-21-2023 at 06:38 AM.
Reply
Old 07-21-2023 | 06:54 AM
  #499  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2023
Posts: 234
Likes: 23
From: Cramped 737 Left Seat
Default

Originally Posted by Extenda
How if you’re a 1990s hire did you not make above 6 figures until 2016? You mean 1990 started flying? Started at the airline? Started at a legacy?
You need to educate yourself on airline history. Your youth and immaturity is showing. My first regional airline job was in 1990. Didn’t start making decent 💸💸 until hired at a legacy in 2013, and first year pay was not what it is today. Six figures started in year 2.

Last edited by JackReacher; 07-21-2023 at 06:55 AM. Reason: Additional comment
Reply
Old 07-21-2023 | 07:00 AM
  #500  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,372
Likes: 358
Default

Originally Posted by JackReacher
You need to educate yourself on airline history. Your youth and immaturity is showing. My first regional airline job was in 1990. Didn’t start making decent 💸💸 until hired at a legacy in 2013, and first year pay was not what it is today. Six figures started in year 2.
Ok then. I was asking for clarity and you provided it. Regional hire in 1990, got it. I don’t know how asking that question led you to believe I’m young and immature? You said 2016 six figures and you were hired in 2013 at a legacy but then you said second year was when you hit 6 figures, which would be 2014, no?

I am a history major so counting/math isn’t my strong suit.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
STEAMROLLER
Major
355
04-04-2023 09:15 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices