Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
IATA Calls for Raising Pilot Age Limit to 67 >

IATA Calls for Raising Pilot Age Limit to 67


Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

IATA Calls for Raising Pilot Age Limit to 67

Old 08-28-2025 | 10:09 AM
  #181  
Line Holder
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Apr 2022
Posts: 338
Likes: 44
From: DL320A
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
Being greedy would be taking something and depriving someone else of what they are owed. That's not a junior pilot. Keeping status quo is not depriving anyone of anything that they didn't already have.
the status quo is 65.
Old 08-28-2025 | 10:32 AM
  #182  
On Reserve
On Reserve
 
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 186
Likes: 48
Default

LOL the updates get more and more unhinged every time. Someone should bring screenshots to present at the ICAO meeting. Proof of cognitive decline happening in real time.
Old 08-28-2025 | 01:09 PM
  #183  
Tesla S's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 123
Likes: 8
From: 756FO
Default

Originally Posted by Flyweight
the status quo is 65.
You must be new to aviation. There really is no such thing as status quo. The only guarantee in aviation is change.

You’re welcome.
Old 08-28-2025 | 01:57 PM
  #184  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2023
Posts: 536
Likes: 140
Default

Originally Posted by Tesla S
You must be new to aviation. There really is no such thing as status quo. The only guarantee in aviation is change.

You’re welcome.
Cognitive decline with age is guaranteed as well. You must be new too.
Old 08-28-2025 | 01:59 PM
  #185  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 309
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Flyweight
the status quo is 65.
Read your contract … status quo is mandatory retirement age … set by the regulators … your career expectations might be based on a “status quo” of the retirement age staying at 65, but the fact is that the mandatory retirement age has and will change over most everyone’s airline career … that is the status quo.

The airline seniority system in place is contractual, not regulatory … any relief to a sense of “fairness” in anyone’s sense of the effects of a change to the mandatory retirement age would have to (and should be) addressed contractually. Was it “status quo” to seek contractual relief during the COVID years to alleviate furloughs?
Old 08-28-2025 | 03:51 PM
  #186  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2025
Posts: 26
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by Flyweight
the status quo is 65.

Def of status quo is “ existing conditions”. Conditions can change for a number of reasons, just as it did in 07 when the age went from 60 to 65. No where in any airline contract does it guarantee any of us will upgrade. Just like the flow thru to American, that can flow backwards. Also, I believe there were pilots who went from the left seat to right seat after 9/11 at many of the majors and spent a few years back in the right seat.
Old 08-28-2025 | 04:13 PM
  #187  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 216
Likes: 46
Default

Originally Posted by Flygirl12
Def of status quo is “ existing conditions”. Conditions can change for a number of reasons, just as it did in 07 when the age went from 60 to 65. No where in any airline contract does it guarantee any of us will upgrade. Just like the flow thru to American, that can flow backwards. Also, I believe there were pilots who went from the left seat to right seat after 9/11 at many of the majors and spent a few years back in the right seat.
There actually isn’t a “backflow” to the regionals at AA. Facts matter.
Old 08-28-2025 | 04:25 PM
  #188  
Gets Weekend Reserve
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,270
Likes: 256
From: B737CA
Default

Originally Posted by FutureMajor8
There actually isn’t a “backflow” to the regionals at AA. Facts matter.
They do, indeed. American Eagle, before it became a brand and an airline called Envoy, had a flow through to American which included a provision for flowbacks, which was used quite a bit in the aftermath of 9/11.
Old 08-28-2025 | 04:51 PM
  #189  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2025
Posts: 26
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by FutureMajor8
There actually isn’t a “backflow” to the regionals at AA. Facts matter.
Well there were flowbacks and there was talk of it again in 2020 with Covid when American furloughed 1600 pilots. So facts only matter to you when it’s convenient. Like the Republic pilots standing in food stamps line in their uniform. Still waiting on someone to produce that memo they claim was sent out by Republic.
Old 08-28-2025 | 04:58 PM
  #190  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 332
Likes: 41
From: Picking up the Forta Magnus clearance from Melnix.
Default

Originally Posted by RJSAviator76
They do, indeed. American Eagle, before it became a brand and an airline called Envoy, had a flow through to American which included a provision for flowbacks, which was used quite a bit in the aftermath of 9/11.
I can say with certainty that the above statement is 100% correct.

And as discussed earlier. ALPA showed up in our new hire class in 1994 at Wings West/Eagle and “suggested” that we not wear our pilot uniforms if we applied for food stamps. I never did. Mowed lawns and cut firewood on the side.

we were RAPA. It was a real joke.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
satchip
Corporate
11
09-16-2009 07:22 PM
eFDeeeX
Cargo
59
01-31-2008 01:30 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices