Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Economic Impacts of Iran War >

Economic Impacts of Iran War


Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Economic Impacts of Iran War

Old 03-16-2026 | 12:54 PM
  #111  
FangsF15's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,298
Likes: 1,305
Default

Originally Posted by BlueScholar
You don’t see any difference between the price of oil spiking because another country launched an invasion, versus America and our own elected leaders deciding to invade another country and destabilize the middle was yet again, for no clear reason and certainly not to distract from the Epstein Files? You really don’t understand the concept of a self inflicted crisis?
Wait, are you actually saying you think the President launched strikes on Iran to distract from the Epstein Files???
Reply
Old 03-16-2026 | 01:18 PM
  #112  
Gets Weekend Reserve
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,269
Likes: 252
From: B737CA
Default

Originally Posted by FangsF15
Wait, are you actually saying you think the President launched strikes on Iran to distract from the Epstein Files???
Does this surprise you given all the other insane and downright comical things these people actually believe in?

Reply
Old 03-16-2026 | 01:21 PM
  #113  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,520
Likes: 1,104
Default

Originally Posted by OpieTaylor
Would it be reasonable to think this means the centrifuges were destroyed?

Fairly reasonable to believe some enriched material was evacuated, and this statement is still 100% true.

Maybe “throughly yanked” is an incorrect paraphrase designed to overstate a fact, in order to embarrass the success of the actual facts.

Yes they could have waited until they built another centrifuge, or enriched material further but that doesn’t also mean destroying it would be easier at a future date.
As part of the debate last summer, people mentioned to the administration that there was trucking activity at the site in the weeks leading up to the bombing and suggested most of the material had been relocated. The administration attacked the reporters who dared suggest that.

Hence the release above.
Reply
Old 03-16-2026 | 01:28 PM
  #114  
FangsF15's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,298
Likes: 1,305
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
As part of the debate last summer, people mentioned to the administration that there was trucking activity at the site in the weeks leading up to the bombing and suggested most of the material had been relocated. The administration attacked the reporters who dared suggest that.

Hence the release above.

This is a fair point.

Assessments can and do change. Not sure if that fully explains the ‘now’, or if the Iranians greatly accelerated their efforts, or both.
Reply
Old 03-16-2026 | 02:09 PM
  #115  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2022
Posts: 865
Likes: 156
Default

Originally Posted by RJSAviator76
Does this surprise you given all the other insane and downright comical things these people actually believe in?
nothing surprises with these people’s derangement.

the number of L’s they’ve taken since March 2020 is astonishing yet they keep trying.
Reply
Old 03-16-2026 | 02:15 PM
  #116  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 3,680
Likes: 245
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
As part of the debate last summer, people mentioned to the administration that there was trucking activity at the site in the weeks leading up to the bombing and suggested most of the material had been relocated. The administration attacked the reporters who dared suggest that.

Hence the release above.
It is an odd headline. If you pull up that post (it’s still there ironically), most of the quotes refuting the fake news are more measured, indicating a reduction, not elimination of capabilities.
Reply
Old 03-16-2026 | 02:15 PM
  #117  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2021
Posts: 621
Likes: 47
Default

Originally Posted by FangsF15
This is a fair point.

Assessments can and do change. Not sure if that fully explains the ‘now’, or if the Iranians greatly accelerated their efforts, or both.

It seems like the “now” was that Israel was determined to seize the opportunity to strike the supreme leader. They gave courtesy notice to the US.

Iran was determined to drag the US into the Israel fight because they lost the Syria/Hezbollah threats to check Israel.

Trump’s options were shoot down Israel planes, withdraw iron dome support for civilians, or hunker down while Iran responded to the Israel strike.

Trump decided to own the whole thing instead of just responding to Iranian aggression provoked by Israel.

Sounds like midnight hammer set them far enough back for Trump to be happy but not for Bibi to be happy, which is why Trump has an obvious pivot.
Reply
Old 03-16-2026 | 02:18 PM
  #118  
FangsF15's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,298
Likes: 1,305
Default

Originally Posted by OpieTaylor
It seems like the “now” was that Israel was determined to seize the opportunity to strike the supreme leader. They gave courtesy notice to the US.

Iran was determined to drag the US into the Israel fight because they lost the Syria/Hezbollah threats to check Israel.

Trump’s options were shoot down Israel planes, withdraw iron dome support for civilians, or hunker down while Iran responded to the Israel strike.

Trump decided to own the whole thing instead of just responding to Iranian aggression provoked by Israel.
What evidence to you have which led you to that conclusion?

“Seems” like an Armchair General take, which reveals a pretty stark bias.

Reply
Old 03-16-2026 | 02:23 PM
  #119  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2021
Posts: 621
Likes: 47
Default

Originally Posted by FangsF15
What evidence to you have which led you to that conclusion?

“Seems” like an Armchair General take, which reveals a pretty stark bias.
I don’t have any evidence.

It’s reported in the news Trump needs congress to do this unless there isn’t time for congress.

The only way to explain the urgency is the idea Israel was going to act alone if need be, and Iran had a creditable threat of attacking US if Iran was attacked by Israel.


Everyone can armchair.

Did Japan surrender to the US because of the atomic bombs destruction or because Russia declared war in Manchuria.

No one can prove Japan was going to surrender anyway without Russia declaring war. It’s just sort of obvious to everyone except the Japanese.

They think we dropped the bomb for no reason, and they would have surrendered when Russia declared war without dropping it. Just a bunch of indiscriminate killers.

Last edited by OpieTaylor; 03-16-2026 at 02:44 PM.
Reply
Old 03-16-2026 | 05:05 PM
  #120  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,460
Likes: 473
Default

Originally Posted by FangsF15
Wait, are you actually saying you think the President launched strikes on Iran to distract from the Epstein Files???
Originally Posted by CBreezy
As part of the debate last summer, people mentioned to the administration that there was trucking activity at the site in the weeks leading up to the bombing and suggested most of the material had been relocated. The administration attacked the reporters who dared suggest that.

Hence the release above.
Originally Posted by FangsF15
This is a fair point.

Assessments can and do change. Not sure if that fully explains the ‘now’, or if the Iranians greatly accelerated their efforts, or both.


No partisan politics unless it matches the political inclination of the two mods here, Fangs and rickair. You people said it was off limits to discuss the why or how we got to this war, and only the impacts going forward could be discussed.

But if you’re asking:

Originally Posted by FangsF15
Wait, are you actually saying you think the President launched strikes on Iran to distract from the Epstein Files???
Since you asked the question, I assume it can be answered without getting banned. Yes, one of several reasons. Another reason was the SCOTUS turning down his entire tariff agenda. This was published Feb 21 literally one week before the war on Iran started. A close ally to him saying now an Iran attack would be imminent to try to save and define his legacy.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15579503/amp/Trump-tariffs-defeat-Iran-attack.html

Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jungle
Money Talk
3
01-12-2009 07:31 AM
ryan1234
Money Talk
0
12-05-2008 08:27 PM
jungle
Money Talk
1
11-25-2008 03:28 PM
vagabond
Money Talk
0
10-26-2008 08:48 PM
robthree
Regional
13
09-01-2007 03:23 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices