FAPA, please explain...
#32
What boilerup said.
Its over who cares!!
The F9 pay rates would have returned to pre concession plus the raises we have in our TA.
Jr. base at SWA LAS or OAK.
Alot of mis information and half truths but that is water under the bridge.
Its over who cares!!
The F9 pay rates would have returned to pre concession plus the raises we have in our TA.
Jr. base at SWA LAS or OAK.
Alot of mis information and half truths but that is water under the bridge.
Last edited by mulcher; 10-01-2009 at 12:20 PM.
#33
God I hope Spanky isn't a SWA pilot. If you are, "choke yourself". I have no idea why anyone at SWA would want to drudge this up now?
As a SWA FO I thought that we could have made this work out as a win/win for everyone.
Any SWA pilot who thinks we wouldn't have furloughed at least some of the Frontier guys initially has his head in the kool-aid.
BUT, since we did offer 2 year base protection, no one in Frontier would have been commuting anywhere for a while. Regardless of the "staple", that would have also been a de-facto seat protection until the base protection went away.
Depending on how we grew during that time-frame, it might have worked out pretty nice for everyone.
However, we'll never know. I hope it works out well for all of us. I think in the end, we all got what we really wanted.
As a SWA FO I thought that we could have made this work out as a win/win for everyone.
Any SWA pilot who thinks we wouldn't have furloughed at least some of the Frontier guys initially has his head in the kool-aid.
BUT, since we did offer 2 year base protection, no one in Frontier would have been commuting anywhere for a while. Regardless of the "staple", that would have also been a de-facto seat protection until the base protection went away.
Depending on how we grew during that time-frame, it might have worked out pretty nice for everyone.
However, we'll never know. I hope it works out well for all of us. I think in the end, we all got what we really wanted.
#34
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,333
Likes: 0
No dog in this fight but the 4 Frontier pilots I know (all fos) are very fearful of their future now and all four will be pursuing SWA. If other airlines start hiring they might look into it too...
Their reasoning seems to be the fact very senior MidEx captains got furloughed while Republic is doing their flying all very cheaply... They think they're safe for the next year or so but think it'll be in the company's interest to drag out the pilot integration for years because Republic pilots are so cheap comparing to Midwest and now Frontier pilots... Who knows?
Not a suscriber so I don't have the full article...
Republic Airways Begins to Meld Its Frontier and Midwest Acquisitions - WSJ.com
Any WSJ subscribers here care to post the entire article?
BUSINESSOCTOBER 1, 2009, 5:49 P.M. ET
Republic Airways Begins to Meld Its Frontier and Midwest Acquisitions
BY SUSAN CAREY
The next step for Republic Airways Holdings Inc.—now owner of Frontier Airlines Holdings, which emerged from bankruptcy-court protection Thursday—will be an unusual cross-pollination of Frontier and Republic's other new acquisition, Midwest Airlines.
Republic, previously an operator of commuter carriers that fly on behalf of five major U.S. airlines, now owns two branded, hub-and-spoke lines: Denver-based discounter Frontier and ailing, full-service Midwest, based in Milwaukee. The idea is to keep both brands but stitch together their operations and inject more of Republic's own flight crews and regional planes into the mix.
Republic is taking on this challenge—and assuming about $1 billion ...
Their reasoning seems to be the fact very senior MidEx captains got furloughed while Republic is doing their flying all very cheaply... They think they're safe for the next year or so but think it'll be in the company's interest to drag out the pilot integration for years because Republic pilots are so cheap comparing to Midwest and now Frontier pilots... Who knows?
Not a suscriber so I don't have the full article...
Republic Airways Begins to Meld Its Frontier and Midwest Acquisitions - WSJ.com
Any WSJ subscribers here care to post the entire article?
BUSINESSOCTOBER 1, 2009, 5:49 P.M. ET
Republic Airways Begins to Meld Its Frontier and Midwest Acquisitions
BY SUSAN CAREY
The next step for Republic Airways Holdings Inc.—now owner of Frontier Airlines Holdings, which emerged from bankruptcy-court protection Thursday—will be an unusual cross-pollination of Frontier and Republic's other new acquisition, Midwest Airlines.
Republic, previously an operator of commuter carriers that fly on behalf of five major U.S. airlines, now owns two branded, hub-and-spoke lines: Denver-based discounter Frontier and ailing, full-service Midwest, based in Milwaukee. The idea is to keep both brands but stitch together their operations and inject more of Republic's own flight crews and regional planes into the mix.
Republic is taking on this challenge—and assuming about $1 billion ...
#35
On Reserve
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
One thing about it, I would rather be watching from the sidelines. I think the Midwest and the RAH pilots should make the same demands on SLI that the F-9 pilots made on SWA, after all thats what they thought would be fair.
luvin my job!
luvin my job!
#37
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: A318/319 pic
luvin my job![/quote] and not bitter at all.
I am amazed at how many pilots from your dominate, well paying airline can not let this go. Move on. To Southwest's credit their are also many of your own encouraging you to do so also.
I am amazed at how many pilots from your dominate, well paying airline can not let this go. Move on. To Southwest's credit their are also many of your own encouraging you to do so also.
#38
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
Please forgive the length of this, but...
Actually, we have multiple pay raises over the course of the CBA, and no changes to the QOL (except better pass benefits due to the expanded network).
Well put, FreightDawg - I wish I was as eloquent.
The reason for the "outrageous" conditions, was primarily as a hedge against SWAPA's assurances ("we probably won't have to furlough any of you"), and also in response to SWAPA's unwillingness to negotiate. FAPA had multiple different proposals prepared - SWAPA had only one, from what I've heard.
Every F9 pilot I have spoken to would have been perfectly happy to go to arbitration, and I bet most WN pilots would have been opposed to it. That alone speaks volumes for what SWAPA wanted. SWAPA's offer was the equivalent of DL offering to staple NW pilots to their list because DL's pay scale was higher.
Are you one of the three F9 pilots that I've met (out of about 100) who feel that way?
I take it we won't be seeing you back here then? I'd like to see you taken care of in an SLI, but I understand if you don't want to come back.
WN only wanted 40 of our 51 airplanes, and would only have taken enough pilots to staff them, and not guaranteed any SWAPA representation for the furloughed pilots.(i.e. probably no recall rights). Thus, QOL and earnings for the furloughed pilots, not to mention the other 4000 employees would have been worse. I would have been fine, but you can color me Christian - I'll do unto others, and not just watch out for myself.
I agree with the first three sentences, but I think that the SWAPA guys would have been better off without us to compete against, and with a DEN domicile, even if their relative seniority was unchanged in a percentage merger.
Make me the 4th.
Actually, captains would have been returned to pre-concessionary rates, so something like a 15% pay raise.
I'd rather take my chances with RAH at the front end of something that might be very big one day, than be on the bottom of a mega-airline that has pretty much tapped out all the major markets in the US now (except ATL and MSP). To the Chicken Littles out there who say that F9 will get the same deal as YX - Midwest, regrettably, was shrinking like crazy before RAH came along. F9 is a "Whole Different Animal", and I hope we can bring the YX guys along for the ride.
Gee, Spanky, I don't work at either Frontier or SWA - and I think even I'm bright enough to figure this out -
Staple Frontier to the bottom.
All SWA guys move up. (wheeeee)
All Frontier guys are now FOs (woooooo)
Kiss all seniority goodbye.
Kowtow to the almighty SWA gods
Staple Frontier to the bottom.
All SWA guys move up. (wheeeee)
All Frontier guys are now FOs (woooooo)
Kiss all seniority goodbye.
Kowtow to the almighty SWA gods

The reason for the "outrageous" conditions, was primarily as a hedge against SWAPA's assurances ("we probably won't have to furlough any of you"), and also in response to SWAPA's unwillingness to negotiate. FAPA had multiple different proposals prepared - SWAPA had only one, from what I've heard.
Every F9 pilot I have spoken to would have been perfectly happy to go to arbitration, and I bet most WN pilots would have been opposed to it. That alone speaks volumes for what SWAPA wanted. SWAPA's offer was the equivalent of DL offering to staple NW pilots to their list because DL's pay scale was higher.
Let me add a third Frontier pilot to the mix by saying I was not pleased by the Southwest offer and am happy with the outcome.
All captains' maintain current pay rate until higher at Southwest. Now FOs at Southwest commuting to reserve.
I am content to roll the dice with Republic. For what it's worth, I love my job. I work with a great bunch of people fly good equipment, with great work rules/scheduling. I don't like to commute and I don't like reserve.
All captains' maintain current pay rate until higher at Southwest. Now FOs at Southwest commuting to reserve.
I am content to roll the dice with Republic. For what it's worth, I love my job. I work with a great bunch of people fly good equipment, with great work rules/scheduling. I don't like to commute and I don't like reserve.
Actually, captains would have been returned to pre-concessionary rates, so something like a 15% pay raise.
I'd rather take my chances with RAH at the front end of something that might be very big one day, than be on the bottom of a mega-airline that has pretty much tapped out all the major markets in the US now (except ATL and MSP). To the Chicken Littles out there who say that F9 will get the same deal as YX - Midwest, regrettably, was shrinking like crazy before RAH came along. F9 is a "Whole Different Animal", and I hope we can bring the YX guys along for the ride.
#39
The reason for the "outrageous" conditions, was primarily as a hedge against SWAPA's assurances ("we probably won't have to furlough any of you"), and also in response to SWAPA's unwillingness to negotiate. FAPA had multiple different proposals prepared - SWAPA had only one, from what I've heard.
Thats funny we are told something different. Plus SWAPA tried contacting FAPA 3 times without any response.
Every F9 pilot I have spoken to would have been perfectly happy to go to arbitration, and I bet most WN pilots would have been opposed to it. That alone speaks volumes for what SWAPA wanted. SWAPA's offer was the equivalent of DL offering to staple NW pilots to their list because DL's pay scale was higher.
DL and NW are slightly different then SWA and F9, you were either joking with this or just not very bright.
Are you one of the three F9 pilots that I've met (out of about 100) who feel that way?
I take it we won't be seeing you back here then? I'd like to see you taken care of in an SLI, but I understand if you don't want to come back.
WN only wanted 40 of our 51 airplanes, and would only have taken enough pilots to staff them, and not guaranteed any SWAPA representation for the furloughed pilots. EVERY F9 pilot would have had recall rights even those on furlough at F9. Once on the property SWAPA pilots would have doen everything possible to prevent furlough. Who feeds you guys this junk? FAPA. What will the RAH guys do for you if it comes down to it? Pretty easy to answer that one. Plus the plans were for growth and still is. WE will have to see.(i.e. probably no recall rights). Thus, QOL and earnings for the furloughed pilots, not to mention the other 4000 employees would have been worse. I would have been fine, but you can color me Christian - I'll do unto others, and not just watch out for myself.
I agree with the first three sentences, but I think that the SWAPA guys would have been better off without us to compete against, and with a DEN domicile, even if their relative seniority was unchanged in a percentage merger. And how much better for F9 would it have been? Can you say windfall. Why is it ok for one and not the other? I have it on good authority that IF F9 would have negotiated with SWAPA. A feather intergration into the FO list would have been an option. That way F9 guys would have their QOL, pay protected, base, bidding ability and benefits. The down side all SWAP members would upgrade before any F9. But in the end F9 qol would have been drastically improved.
Make me the 4th.
Actually, captains would have been returned to pre-concessionary rates, so something like a 15% pay raise.
I'd rather take my chances with RAH at the front end of something that might be very big one day, than be on the bottom of a mega-airline that has pretty much tapped out all the major markets in the US now (except ATL and MSP). To the Chicken Littles out there who say that F9 will get the same deal as YX - Midwest, regrettably, was shrinking like crazy before RAH came along. F9 is a "Whole Different Animal", and I hope we can bring the YX guys along for the ride.
Sorry I didnt really want to hash this up, but we can see how far off the stories are. Ill ask who has to save face to their union and who really doesnt?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nicale
Career Questions
8
09-14-2008 06:46 AM
DANCRJ
Compass Airlines
19
08-13-2008 04:30 PM



