![]() |
Originally Posted by Ralphie
(Post 859471)
As for trying to get them beneath me, those slots will be filled by someone junior to me regardless, thank God.;) Commuting to reserve stinks!
Maybe we could address the reserve rules in 2012 and actually make reserve an acceptable position. :eek: |
Pitts;
If you flew 18 duty periods in a month you are breaking guarantee, by a lot 5:15 x 18 = 94.5 hrs for the Duty Credit min. Look at the PWA. Section 12 and 23. PDF file it, and then search reserves. |
Originally Posted by PittsS2B
(Post 859618)
...line holders fly 14 days (at most) for 80+ hours....
And never layover. Don't even own suitcases.;) Of course the FOs holding those lines have 20 years and the Capts have 30. #4193 SU EFFECTIVE SEP. 12-SEP. 26 CHECK-IN AT 9.15 SKED ON-DUTY DAY FLIGHT T DEPARTS ARRIVES C BLK. EQ ACT/MAX A DH 421 ATL 0945 UVF 1427 4.42 738 426 UVF 1517 ATL 2000 4.43 M 11.15/13.00 4.42DHD 4.43BL .00CRD 9.25TL .00DPA .00TRP TOTALS--- 9.25TL 4.43BL 4.42CR TAFB 11.15 |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 859625)
Pitts;
If you flew 18 duty periods in a month you are breaking guarantee, by a lot 5:15 x 18 = 94.5 hrs for the Duty Credit min. Look at the PWA. Section 12 and 23. PDF file it, and then search reserves. I had no complaints about our reserve rules when I was living in base. When displacements force a person to commute, it's a different ballgame on reserve. |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 859625)
Pitts;
If you flew 18 duty periods in a month you are breaking guarantee, by a lot 5:15 x 18 = 94.5 hrs for the Duty Credit min. Look at the PWA. Section 12 and 23. PDF file it, and then search reserves. |
Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
(Post 859634)
Unfortunately, we are doing lots of days on reserve with only deadheads. We are also doing lots of 30 hour layovers with no duty for a day. It's very easy to get 18 days of flying on reserve without breaking guarantee.
|
Originally Posted by Bluto
(Post 859633)
ACL, for those of us who were displaced into commuting to reserve, jumpseating to sit short call on an off day feels a whole lot like a day flying, even though it doesn't count towards our duty credit min. I have a feeling that may be what Pitts was referring to. I work fewer flying hours than I did sitting reserve at home, but my overall quality of life is optimistically 50% of what is was prior to commuting.
I had no complaints about our reserve rules when I was living in base. When displacements force a person to commute, it's a different ballgame on reserve. That was not what he was complaining about. He was talking about the pay. My statement was that if we worked a duty period for each of those 18 days he gets paid well. No more no less. I would also like to see reserves get the same credits as line holders. I would like to see DH only days equate to a duty period for the above calculation, I would like seniority to matter a little more, I would like yellow slip qualifiers mean something. I would like a fly me first, fly me last kind of deal, I would like a lot for reserve pilots. As I am constantly reminded reserve covers about 15% of this group, so the majority will not care what the reserve rules are, they are line holders and want min day credit, not min duty credit, they want other trip and duty rigs. I get that. Point is that it is all a balance. I would like the NWA commuter policy made contractual. My list is long, but there is a process to everything. In the end the pilots voted "Yes" for the PWA we have today, and we are dealing with it day in and day out. My suggestion is to continue to take the time and submit suggestions to your reps for the SOT. It is, to date is the best medium in which we can identify areas that will work for us, both us and the company and the company. Ideas are good. Send them in. Commuting to reserve is the pitts. I did it, and will avoid doing it for the rest of my career. I understand some do not have a choice, and because of that, send you suggestions in. Change only happens when there is a consensus. |
Question for those at Delta. As a new hire if you bid and are award the aircraft and base of your choice and then there is a new AE can someone senior to you bump you out of your base? I guess my question is, is it best to bid the MD-88 to insure that if you get your base of choice you won't be bumped out? Thanks
|
Originally Posted by Too Tall
(Post 859645)
Question for those at Delta. As a new hire if you bid and are award the aircraft and base of your choice and then there is a new AE can someone senior to you bump you out of your base? I guess my question is, is it best to bid the MD-88 to insure that if you get your base of choice you won't be bumped out? Thanks
The best thing for you to do unless you are chasing the money is stay on the junior equipment as that will offer the most protection and upward movement. |
Originally Posted by Too Tall
(Post 859645)
Question for those at Delta. As a new hire if you bid and are award the aircraft and base of your choice and then there is a new AE can someone senior to you bump you out of your base? I guess my question is, is it best to bid the MD-88 to insure that if you get your base of choice you won't be bumped out? Thanks
ie = if you are MSP320B and get displaced, you can have MSPM88B as your first displacement choice. You'd have to go to school on the 88 but you'd still be based in MSP. If you can't hold MSP even on the 88, then it wouldn't have made any difference anyway. Clear as mud? AEs and displacements are hard to explain. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:16 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands