Delta Pilots Association
#3121
New K, You miss a couple of key points. The first I will sum up simple. I listed to Leo Mullins say that he did not care if he paid each of us 1 million dollars a year as long as the the other major airlines paid the same. If the other airlines are paying close to what we are Delta can do just fine. The second point is that the other airlines will be upset if we get a large raise. I hope they are upset and I hope they work to obtain greater raises in their next contract. Like Dalpa at the present however there is little to nothing they can do about it until their amendable dates.
One thing that you also have to understand. I voted no on the current contract. However the majority voted yes. I will always support the majority unlike some who always want to take their toys and go home when they don't get their way. I can tell you from the last two surveys what I am looking for in the next contract is more not less then the majority of the pilots. Sometime next year there will be a long contract survey given to each pilot. That survey will set the basis for our opener to management. If the majority want a opener for a 65 percent raise ect.. I will support it. I think your going to find however you are not going to be happy with what they do want? Will you support a opener that does not agree with what you want but is the will of the majority?
One thing that you also have to understand. I voted no on the current contract. However the majority voted yes. I will always support the majority unlike some who always want to take their toys and go home when they don't get their way. I can tell you from the last two surveys what I am looking for in the next contract is more not less then the majority of the pilots. Sometime next year there will be a long contract survey given to each pilot. That survey will set the basis for our opener to management. If the majority want a opener for a 65 percent raise ect.. I will support it. I think your going to find however you are not going to be happy with what they do want? Will you support a opener that does not agree with what you want but is the will of the majority?
This is what happens when you have a your side vs. my side argument. There are a lot of things you, acl, and pineapple, are saying to justify asking for less. I might have missed a few key points with you, but I am hitting the nail on the head against the points you and the others present to justify your,"let's take two bites at the apple approach." I don't think you fully addressed any of my points, though. I'll leave it at that, for now.
Will I support what the membership wants? Sure. But, I don't think that has ever been the issue. I will use every means to increase whoever I come in contact with to increase their expectations for the next contract, if they are lower than mine, though.
For the people I come in contact with at work, that has not been a problem. I haven't had to do it one time. They all want restoration, which is apparently the opposite of what you are running into. I don't know why we are sensing different attitudes around campus.
I speculate that maybe your FO's are a little hesitant to tell you what they want after you give your "Delta Air Lines cannot survive restoration because the employees will be jealous and they can't afford it" speech. If I tried that, my FO's would tell me to go to hell.

But, if you think the majority of Delta pilots will idly sit by and not get madder and madder when Air Tran -- soon to be SWA -- pilots taxi by, then maybe I don't know Delta pilots. We will see. I hope you are wrong.

New K Now
#3122
So let me see if I got this right. You agree with Sailingfun that any significant progress towards restoration would break Delta Air Lines and that more "reasonable" pay increases are all we can hope for with C2012. The APA's request for partial restoration was way too much and would be way too much for us as well. You believe the majority of our pilots see it this way too. But if you are wrong about the way the majority sees this... and the majority does indeed expect significant progress to be made toward restoration in 2012, then you "fully support" that. You think it will break Delta Air Lines, but you're okay with that as long as that's what the majority wants... even though you think it's wrong.
See, it sounds to me like you want to play both sides of this. Either you believe restoration should be our goal, or you believe it shouldn't. .. and I think most of the argument that you, sailingfun, et al. are making is just "smoke and mirrors."
See, it sounds to me like you want to play both sides of this. Either you believe restoration should be our goal, or you believe it shouldn't. .. and I think most of the argument that you, sailingfun, et al. are making is just "smoke and mirrors."
If you didn't read the post I made previous to this (#3104), we are so much on the same page it's scary. I don't know who's senior, but I suggest you stay in MEM and I stay in DTW. Otherwise, we would be bidding for the same trips and vacations.
#3123
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,871
Likes: 189
Sailing,
This is what happens when you have a your side vs. my side argument. There are a lot of things you, acl, and pineapple, are saying to justify asking for less. I might have missed a few key points with you, but I am hitting the nail on the head against the points you and the others present to justify your,"let's take two bites at the apple approach." I don't think you fully addressed any of my points, though. I'll leave it at that, for now.
Will I support what the membership wants? Sure. But, I don't think that has ever been the issue. I will use every means to increase whoever I come in contact with to increase their expectations for the next contract, if they are lower than mine, though.
For the people I come in contact with at work, that has not been a problem. I haven't had to do it one time. They all want restoration, which is apparently the opposite of what you are running into. I don't know why we are sensing different attitudes around campus.
I speculate that maybe your FO's are a little hesitant to tell you what they want after you give your "Delta Air Lines cannot survive restoration because the employees will be jealous and they can't afford it" speech. If I tried that, my FO's would tell me to go to hell.
But, if you think the majority of Delta pilots will idly sit by and not get madder and madder when Air Tran -- soon to be SWA -- pilots taxi by, then maybe I don't know Delta pilots. We will see. I hope you are wrong.
New K Now
This is what happens when you have a your side vs. my side argument. There are a lot of things you, acl, and pineapple, are saying to justify asking for less. I might have missed a few key points with you, but I am hitting the nail on the head against the points you and the others present to justify your,"let's take two bites at the apple approach." I don't think you fully addressed any of my points, though. I'll leave it at that, for now.
Will I support what the membership wants? Sure. But, I don't think that has ever been the issue. I will use every means to increase whoever I come in contact with to increase their expectations for the next contract, if they are lower than mine, though.
For the people I come in contact with at work, that has not been a problem. I haven't had to do it one time. They all want restoration, which is apparently the opposite of what you are running into. I don't know why we are sensing different attitudes around campus.
I speculate that maybe your FO's are a little hesitant to tell you what they want after you give your "Delta Air Lines cannot survive restoration because the employees will be jealous and they can't afford it" speech. If I tried that, my FO's would tell me to go to hell.

But, if you think the majority of Delta pilots will idly sit by and not get madder and madder when Air Tran -- soon to be SWA -- pilots taxi by, then maybe I don't know Delta pilots. We will see. I hope you are wrong.

New K Now
New K. It was not my FO's. Talk to your reps about what the computer and phone survey showed. I will admit those surveys were before the last quarters profits and as I mentioned sometime next year there will be a full written contract survey sent to all pilots.
AMR is now back to square one after 4 years. They are starting all over again with talks with the company. Once those again break down they are going to have to apply to the NMB all over again for mediation. I fail to see why you think the outcome would be different at Delta. Especially since the NMB is viewed as labor friendly now and that likely will change after Obama term ends. It now appears highly unlikely that AMR will have a contract before our amendable date. Thats bad for them and bad for us. We will have pay rates higher then theirs starting negotiations. Somehow I don't see adopting the APA method as a smart move.
#3126
The Scientific Phone survey will keep calling someone from a specific cross section until they get the response needed.
DAL88;
Whatever our majority position become, I will support it. It is called unity.
DAL88;
Whatever our majority position become, I will support it. It is called unity.
#3127
Two quarters DAL88 does not make prove the plan will be successful going forward.
My guess is 2011 will be in the black but not to the extent this year was.
We do not get paid what we are worth. We get paid what we negotiate. Even if we demand it, we may not get it if it makes the (for profit) company's solvency come in to question. With CH11 and the previous five years as an example, the only way a single step to these pay raises happens, is if all of the major players go play golf one day and think that it is a good idea

Until you can make pilot costs a fix cost across the industry it is going to very hard for any airline to willfully agree to price itself out of many of its markets. Many investors want 10%+ margins to continue to finance an airline. (Suspect they will be happy with 5-7%) but the reality is that as a whole the industry and this profession face stiff headwinds.
The Manager:
I see where you are going with your idea. I makes a lot of sense on the surface, and could be something that is looked at if we opt to change the current formulas. It at least as a static valuation to it.
DAL88;
My person assumption is that DAL can afford at least 1.5-2 times the total raises we got under the JPWA on day one. That is my assumption, and does not include work rule changes.
#3129
#3130
newKnow,
Thanks for posting. You have put into words what I have been thinking for some time. I try to read, keep my mind open and not get drawl into a pi**ing contest with those who have different views. I know we all want the best for all Delta pilots in C2012 and just differ on how to get there. I plan to punch out in 13 years, so this two bite approach may not work so well for the many of us in out late 40's and early 50's. I could always stay the extra 5 years like Billy Cole (that didn't workout well for him), but I would rather be riding a tractor and hunting with family. I also understand the younger guys don't want to upset the growth, as they want more guys below them for the next down cycle. (I fly with lots of FOs who were on the street, some twice.)
FYI: Billy Cole stayed passed 60 and died a month after retiring, never collected a retirement check. (Ask a north guy about FUBC)
Thanks for posting. You have put into words what I have been thinking for some time. I try to read, keep my mind open and not get drawl into a pi**ing contest with those who have different views. I know we all want the best for all Delta pilots in C2012 and just differ on how to get there. I plan to punch out in 13 years, so this two bite approach may not work so well for the many of us in out late 40's and early 50's. I could always stay the extra 5 years like Billy Cole (that didn't workout well for him), but I would rather be riding a tractor and hunting with family. I also understand the younger guys don't want to upset the growth, as they want more guys below them for the next down cycle. (I fly with lots of FOs who were on the street, some twice.)
FYI: Billy Cole stayed passed 60 and died a month after retiring, never collected a retirement check. (Ask a north guy about FUBC)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 10:33 AM




