Delta Pilots Association
#6421
Last edited by Fly4hire; 10-07-2011 at 04:30 AM.
#6423
#6424
Of course you'll blame ALPA for the individual decision by 3/4 of the pilot group to NOT sign on to DPA. It couldn't possibly be that DPA is a bad idea being promoted by angry pilots who don't play well with others. Naaa!
#6425
If:
a. TWA judgement drains the coffers and assessments begin.
b. A contract extension is floated
c. UCAL leave
d. Opener/TA inadequate
e. More stonewalling on legitimate resolutions
The cards will be there and then the games begin.
#6426
Wow! After well over a year, about 25% have allegedly sent cards in. That number is suspect. Even if it's accurate, it's weak. If the choice was as obvious as you, Carl, and the rest of the ALPA-bashers make it, your crusade is not going well. According to Caplinger's posts on the DPA site, the goal was to get a strong majority of pilots to sign up before he would call for an election. Based on your post, it looks like that goal has been abandoned, and you'd be happy just to screw up contract negotiations with a ballot triggered by a 50-50 split.
Of course you'll blame ALPA for the individual decision by 3/4 of the pilot group to NOT sign on to DPA. It couldn't possibly be that DPA is a bad idea being promoted by angry pilots who don't play well with others. Naaa!
Of course you'll blame ALPA for the individual decision by 3/4 of the pilot group to NOT sign on to DPA. It couldn't possibly be that DPA is a bad idea being promoted by angry pilots who don't play well with others. Naaa!
#6427
#6428
Plus, that still doesn't solve the problems with ALPA National and conflict of interest.
I can completely understand why DPA does not consider this to be an alternative.
#6429
Because they know it would be a waste of time and energy. DALPA is very good at spooling up their political machine and fending off recall attempts. Combine that with a generally apathetic pilot group, and you would take the focus of the DPA guys off their objective and cause them to waste time and effort on a lost cause. Just take a look at the last major recall attempt a few years ago in ATL if you want to understand what I'm talking about.
Plus, that still doesn't solve the problems with ALPA National and conflict of interest.
I can completely understand why DPA does not consider this to be an alternative.
Plus, that still doesn't solve the problems with ALPA National and conflict of interest.
I can completely understand why DPA does not consider this to be an alternative.
I also suspect that those in the know also know that what you described is a straw many that most are not willing to fight against. With the vocal group (refuse to call them a minority because I know many that are considered part of the "silent majority that are unhappy, but refuse to entertain doing anything to change it) not acting, don't you think that is what many want? Take your marbles to a new game that you have little hope of winning, and in return they do not have to deal with any organized effort to call BS.
I truly believe that if DPA or its supporters organized and even tried to recall a few reps, the action and organization would not go unnoticed.
I guess it does not matter because what we have is the group that was always the "checkers" not checking to the level they used to. As you said, they do not even want to focus on keeping their reps feet to the fire.
If that is the road you want to go down, fine, but understand that having a group of DPA's size not unified with the rest of the group could prove disastrous in the upcoming Section 6.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 10:33 AM



