Delta Pilots Association
10-07-2011, 01:44 PM
#6431
At home on the maddog!
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
I truly believe that if DPA or its supporters organized and even tried to recall a few reps, the action and organization would not go unnoticed.
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
I guess it does not matter because what we have is the group that was always the "checkers" not checking to the level they used to. As you said, they do not even want to focus on keeping their reps feet to the fire.
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
If that is the road you want to go down, fine, but understand that having a group of DPA's size not unified with the rest of the group could prove disastrous in the upcoming Section 6.
10-07-2011, 01:44 PM
#6432
Banned
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 793
Originally Posted by Karnak
Wow! After well over a year, about 25% have allegedly sent cards in. That number is suspect. Even if it's accurate, it's weak. If the choice was as obvious as you, Carl, and the rest of the ALPA-bashers make it, your crusade is not going well. According to Caplinger's posts on the DPA site, the goal was to get a strong majority of pilots to sign up before he would call for an election. Based on your post, it looks like that goal has been abandoned, and you'd be happy just to screw up contract negotiations with a ballot triggered by a 50-50 split.
Of course you'll blame ALPA for the individual decision by 3/4 of the pilot group to NOT sign on to DPA. It couldn't possibly be that DPA is a bad idea being promoted by angry pilots who don't play well with others. Naaa!
Of course you'll blame ALPA for the individual decision by 3/4 of the pilot group to NOT sign on to DPA. It couldn't possibly be that DPA is a bad idea being promoted by angry pilots who don't play well with others. Naaa!
10-07-2011, 01:51 PM
#6433
Banned
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 793
Originally Posted by Roll Inverted and Pull
Boys, I really don`t care who represents the Delta pilots. I`m long gone, but have a question. Don`t those cards expire after one year?
10-07-2011, 02:14 PM
#6434
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,503
Originally Posted by Jesse
Personally, I don't see it that way. I like the fact our negotiators will have this hanging over them during negotiations. How much clearer can I make this, Mr. Negotiator: Get this right; don't come back to me with something weak. If ALPA thinks they can come back with lackluster offer we all know the renewed energy DPA will stand to gain. I think it's a fair assumption a significant number of Delta pilots who are unhappy with ALPA are still wanting to stick with them for now due to contract negotiations quickly approaching. That tune is sure to change if the faith they've placed in ALPA is taken for granted.
10-07-2011, 02:15 PM
#6435
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,503
Originally Posted by Jesse
I'm not active in DPA but I did send in my card. It took such little effort I can't imagine anything keeping me from sending in another one when I approach a year. I'm confident DPA will send an automated email when the one year date approaches, but it won't be needed. This is coming from a guy who's not a strong advocate, but dissatisfied enough to consider the alternative.
10-07-2011, 02:30 PM
#6436
On Reserve
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: MSP7ERB
Posts: 1,886
Originally Posted by Jesse
Personally, I don't see it that way. I like the fact our negotiators will have this hanging over them during negotiations. How much clearer can I make this, Mr. Negotiator: Get this right; don't come back to me with something weak. If ALPA thinks they can come back with lackluster offer we all know the renewed energy DPA will stand to gain. I think it's a fair assumption a significant number of Delta pilots who are unhappy with ALPA are still wanting to stick with them for now due to contract negotiations quickly approaching. That tune is sure to change if the faith they've placed in ALPA is taken for granted.
10-07-2011, 02:43 PM
#6437
Back on TDY
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Originally Posted by shiznit
Is that the number of website registrees or valid cards on file with the NMB?
Carl
10-07-2011, 02:46 PM
#6438
Back on TDY
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
Those angry pilots could change a lot and very quickly if they got involved and recalled a rep. Somehow that is not something they want to do.
Carl
10-07-2011, 02:50 PM
#6439
Back on TDY
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
I also suspect that those in the know also know that what you described is a straw many that most are not willing to fight against. With the vocal group (refuse to call them a minority because I know many that are considered part of the "silent majority that are unhappy, but refuse to entertain doing anything to change it) not acting, don't you think that is what many want? Take your marbles to a new game that you have little hope of winning, and in return they do not have to deal with any organized effort to call BS.
I truly believe that if DPA or its supporters organized and even tried to recall a few reps, the action and organization would not go unnoticed.
I guess it does not matter because what we have is the group that was always the "checkers" not checking to the level they used to. As you said, they do not even want to focus on keeping their reps feet to the fire.
If that is the road you want to go down, fine, but understand that having a group of DPA's size not unified with the rest of the group could prove disastrous in the upcoming Section 6.
I truly believe that if DPA or its supporters organized and even tried to recall a few reps, the action and organization would not go unnoticed.
I guess it does not matter because what we have is the group that was always the "checkers" not checking to the level they used to. As you said, they do not even want to focus on keeping their reps feet to the fire.
If that is the road you want to go down, fine, but understand that having a group of DPA's size not unified with the rest of the group could prove disastrous in the upcoming Section 6.
Yes!!!!
Carl
10-07-2011, 02:59 PM
#6440
Back on TDY
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
I also suspect that those in the know also know that what you described is a straw many that most are not willing to fight against. With the vocal group (refuse to call them a minority because I know many that are considered part of the "silent majority that are unhappy, but refuse to entertain doing anything to change it) not acting, don't you think that is what many want? Take your marbles to a new game that you have little hope of winning, and in return they do not have to deal with any organized effort to call BS.
I truly believe that if DPA or its supporters organized and even tried to recall a few reps, the action and organization would not go unnoticed.
I guess it does not matter because what we have is the group that was always the "checkers" not checking to the level they used to. As you said, they do not even want to focus on keeping their reps feet to the fire.
If that is the road you want to go down, fine, but understand that having a group of DPA's size not unified with the rest of the group could prove disastrous in the upcoming Section 6.
I truly believe that if DPA or its supporters organized and even tried to recall a few reps, the action and organization would not go unnoticed.
I guess it does not matter because what we have is the group that was always the "checkers" not checking to the level they used to. As you said, they do not even want to focus on keeping their reps feet to the fire.
If that is the road you want to go down, fine, but understand that having a group of DPA's size not unified with the rest of the group could prove disastrous in the upcoming Section 6.
And stop being such a drama queen about the DPA ruining unity. The DPA's activity is the very heart of democracy in action. I know you're only for it when it suits your own personal goals within ALPA, but this process is a very good thing on many levels. Not the least of which will be the strong likelihood of DALPA negotiating with a gun to their heads. That gun being held by DPA members. That's a very good thing. But it is also something that DALPA does NOT want...thus the talking points that the DPA is ruining unity.
Carl
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 10:33 AM
