Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Delta Pilots Association >

Delta Pilots Association

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta Pilots Association

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-25-2012 | 05:30 PM
  #7291  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
From: DAL
Default

What happens if ALPA sandbags us on the next consolidation or contract go-around and we (Delta pilots) are forced to file our own DFR lawsuit against them?

We'll have to get in line behind the TWA guys. The cupboard will be bare.

If we keep them on the property, there is no downside for ALPA. There is a HUGE downside for us.
Reply
Old 01-25-2012 | 05:48 PM
  #7292  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Default

Since we're talking hypotheticals If DPA was to be a complete failure where would the $$$ come from in a DFR suit????
Reply
Old 01-25-2012 | 06:18 PM
  #7293  
Gomerglideslope's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by capncrunch
He may have a point. ALPA urged us to support the NYC slot swap and it turned out only to help management and the ALPA supported regionals, not Delta pilots.
I'd like to see RJ's banished entirely from all NYC airports...but how exactly does this "help" regionals? It doesn't increase the number of RJs, it just moves their flying from somewhere else, no?
Reply
Old 01-25-2012 | 07:09 PM
  #7294  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Rather B Fishin
Since we're talking hypotheticals If DPA was to be a complete failure where would the $$$ come from in a DFR suit????
Kitty Hawk insurance.

Carl
Reply
Old 01-26-2012 | 05:28 AM
  #7295  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Kitty Hawk insurance.

Carl
Reply
Old 01-26-2012 | 07:13 AM
  #7296  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,823
Likes: 169
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by Gomerglideslope
I'd like to see RJ's banished entirely from all NYC airports...but how exactly does this "help" regionals? It doesn't increase the number of RJs, it just moves their flying from somewhere else, no?
Sort of, if a company enters into long term agreements with them. But over all doing that (banning them in NYC or just market based forces) applies more pressure to make that flying unsustainable. In the end it will be reduced. At first that flying will be spread out elsewhere because its already paid for (just like binding airplane debt, only worse) but forcing water to run uphill gets expensive quick.

I'm convinced that if we allowed 255 more large RJ's the company would commit to them regardless of "need" or even pilot cost. In any case we are now told that these CPA/ASA/RFP/OPP agreements are "at risk" but I wouldn't put too much faith in that. I haven't seen much more than penalties here and there for cancelled flights and poor on time performance.

Truly at risk would be a (one way check valve limited) revenue sharing only program with no obligation to pay for gas or any other expense and a quickly reached hard cap on the revenue that would be shared. But we're not going to see strong agreements like that. They couldn't get the credit to pretend to purchase or lease the aircraft in the first place (ergo its still 100% our debt in real life). Companies will engage in predatory bargaining by submitting impossible low ball bids to get the work and once they have it they will continue to cry poor and sue us for enforcing performance penalties. Either way that lift will be force fed to markets that don't fully (if at all) support it or would be better off with mainline gauge segments just to find a home for it.
Reply
Old 01-30-2012 | 05:44 PM
  #7297  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
From: DAL
Default

After lurking on some other airlines' threads, it's easy to spot the management flunkies. I can't out-and-out identify any management schmucks on the Delta thread. I used to think ACL65 was one, but he's since gone in the tank for DALPA (although that's not much of a leap).

I submit that there are no obvious management shills pushing the company line here because the DALPA stooges do the heavy lifting for them. Good job, guys. Keep up the good work. Have fun spending my money while you bend me over.
Reply
Old 01-30-2012 | 05:59 PM
  #7298  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by More Bacon
What happens if ALPA sandbags us on the next consolidation or contract go-around and we (Delta pilots) are forced to file our own DFR lawsuit against them?

We'll have to get in line behind the TWA guys. The cupboard will be bare.

If we keep them on the property, there is no downside for ALPA. There is a HUGE downside for us.
What if? I mean what if it is common knowledge laughter is the best medicine and yet someone died laughing, who would you sue? How far east can you go before your to the west? If a transvestite goes missing, would you put their face on a carton of Half and Half? Since bread is square, then why is sandwich meat round? Did Noah have woodpeckers on the ark? If he did, where did he keep them? I mean, what if?
Reply
Old 01-30-2012 | 06:00 PM
  #7299  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
From: DAL
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
What if?

I mean what if it is common knowledge laughter is the best medicine and yet someone died laughing, who would you sue?
How far east can you go before your to the west?
If a transvestite goes missing, would you put their face on a carton of Half and Half?
Since bread is square, then why is sandwich meat round?
Did Noah have woodpeckers on the ark? If he did, where did he keep them?

I mean, what if?
Mea Culpa. My post was over the top.

Mmm, half and half. I love that stuff on my Frosted Cheerios.
Reply
Old 01-30-2012 | 06:14 PM
  #7300  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by Wasatch Phantom
ACL,

You really didn't address More Bacon's question, so I'll restate it.

Delta pilots are paying dues to ALPA national. ALPA national is paying attorneys lots of money to defend ALPA as a result of a lawsuit file by TWA pilots, (which ALPA lost). Some of the Delta pilot's dues money is being spent on those attorneys, both at the original trial and now appeal.

How specifically does that benefit Delta pilots?

I've tried to frame the question fairly, and would appreciate a sincere response...
The question assumes facts not known to be true. Typically the insurer(s) who are exposed to the loss manage and pay for the costs of defense.

Defense helps the Delta pilots in as much as ALPA itself helps to promote our profession in general and Delta pilots in specific.

The TWA case still surprises me a bit, after all the TWA MEC had the power to make their decisions and were sophisticated parties themselves. Both they and their pilots ratified a decision, which they with the benefit of 20/20 hindsight now blame on their attorney (ALPA).

I've spoken to their own expert on the case and he admits the damages are very speculative. We can only guess how integration might have gone had the TWA guys left their Section 1 intact and taken a hard line. We can only guess that a Judge would not have modified the TWA job protection provisions. I mean, nearly anything could have happened ... and now the AA PWA is going to go through Chapter 11. This thing has about a million shades of gray to try to define.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 10:33 AM
WatchThis!
Major
68
07-13-2008 08:12 AM
757Driver
Mergers and Acquisitions
190
04-19-2008 11:27 AM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 07:25 PM
RockBottom
Major
5
04-13-2006 05:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices