I'm Voting for the TA
#81
You are correct concerning sec 1 however, THIS TA will not exist if we turn it down. Plan B for the company goes into effect. As the original JCBA fell off of the table when I was not ratified. That opens the door for he DCI plan. The company has a different intent for Alaska which will be made known after this TA is settled because it is contingent upon the outcome of whatever agreement is reached.
#82
Doing Nothing
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,316
Likes: 0
There is a lot of upward movement here but then negative movement there. Some guys on here say hey look the turboprop seat number has changed and intl JV language is tightened. However; it's plain to see that we gave where management really wants to take. Then they gave in the guise of raises but lowered compensation in the 401k stuff. I too started out as a yes vote but have slowly thought and read the TA a couple times and have come to the conclusion that all this rushing surely stinks. I used to think it was a North distrusting management thing and a South blindly following thing. What Carl said really struck a chord in me, The pilots spoke in the contract survey and the MEC did not deliver. I took a hard look at my paycheck and saw how much dues were going to our so called Representation. Looks like the MEC just didn't listen and things went too fast. Send it back!
#83
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Likes: 0

In the first 18 months of this agreement pay rates go up 16.2% with an additional 1% DC thrown in on top of that. Reserves get an additional 8% with guarantee increase. I've explained the profit sharing ad nauseum, but if something goes wrong in this world I'm sure you'll be clamoring for the conversion back to profit sharing...
#84
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,518
Likes: 0
From: B737 CA
#85
For a guy in your situation (very reserve A320B) you're going from a 70 hour guarantee at a payrate of $108.83 (annual income of $91,417) to a 75.5 hour guarantee (averaged) at $138.48 (annual income of 125,465), and you'll still have 2 years of step raises left. If an increase of $34,000 (37%) for a first officer is "chump change" I'd like some more of that. Oh, and if we grow you won't be on reserve so the pay will be even higher. Make sure you tell your wife. 
In the first 18 months of this agreement pay rates go up 16.2% with an additional 1% DC thrown in on top of that. Reserves get an additional 8% with guarantee increase. I've explained the profit sharing ad nauseum, but if something goes wrong in this world I'm sure you'll be clamoring for the conversion back to profit sharing...

In the first 18 months of this agreement pay rates go up 16.2% with an additional 1% DC thrown in on top of that. Reserves get an additional 8% with guarantee increase. I've explained the profit sharing ad nauseum, but if something goes wrong in this world I'm sure you'll be clamoring for the conversion back to profit sharing...
I could care less about profit sharing, really. What is astounding is that these crappy overall paybumps had to be funded by the reduction in the profit sharing. If the paybumps were, say, 20% by Jan 1 and another 10% in 2014, then that would be both more believable and more on the road to industry leading.
#86
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Likes: 0
He called that amount of money "chump change." You then extrapolate to "all about me."
How about we look at the collective number. In 2015 Delta pilot pay will be $420 million more than it is this year using the same pay hour formula.
It will take UAL/CAL over $700 million per year and 400 additional pilot hires to come up to that contract.
Chump change...all about me....really. Really?
#87
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Likes: 0
Sure, that's neat and all that my pay as a reserve will be going up... but that's hardly the big picture. This contract will keep me off the widebdodies and make upgrade longer (lower reserve staffing) and allow outsourcing to last longer in the future.
I could care less about profit sharing, really. What is astounding is that these crappy overall paybumps had to be funded by the reduction in the profit sharing. If the paybumps were, say, 20% by Jan 1 and another 10% in 2014, then that would be both more believable and more on the road to industry leading.
I could care less about profit sharing, really. What is astounding is that these crappy overall paybumps had to be funded by the reduction in the profit sharing. If the paybumps were, say, 20% by Jan 1 and another 10% in 2014, then that would be both more believable and more on the road to industry leading.
That's neat and all. The payraises should have been 85%, 30% and 30%. Because we're worth it. Your 20%/10% is just weak. A sellout. It doesn't get us anywhere close to what a 1990 pilot made plus inflation.

And the TA won't keep you off the widebodies. Leaving flying at DCI won't help you get to the widebodies either.
#88
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
. On with the discussion for the adults.
#89
Sure, that's neat and all that my pay as a reserve will be going up... but that's hardly the big picture. This contract will keep me off the widebdodies and make upgrade longer (lower reserve staffing) and allow outsourcing to last longer in the future.
I could care less about profit sharing, really. What is astounding is that these crappy overall paybumps had to be funded by the reduction in the profit sharing. If the paybumps were, say, 20% by Jan 1 and another 10% in 2014, then that would be both more believable and more on the road to industry leading.
I could care less about profit sharing, really. What is astounding is that these crappy overall paybumps had to be funded by the reduction in the profit sharing. If the paybumps were, say, 20% by Jan 1 and another 10% in 2014, then that would be both more believable and more on the road to industry leading.
I am curious though, how do you feel that THIS Ta keeps you off the widebodies? Are you in the same camp now as R.O. on the DAL forum?
#90
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



