Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Major (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/)
-   -   What will it Take? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/68558-what-will-take.html)

Molon Labe 06-30-2012 10:39 PM


Originally Posted by Denny Crane (Post 1222546)
Unfortunately I only play one on TV!:) And a cancelled one at that!!:D

As far as grievences go, I think there is definitely a difference in the way DALPA and NWALPA pursued them. My impression is that NWALPA used a more "shotgun" type approach while DALPA used/uses a "sniper" type approach. I'm not saying one is better than the other just that DALPA has a tendency to only pursue those grievences they feel they have a 90% chance or better they can win it. (Again, my impression only)

With a hard number ratio that one can put in front of an arbitrator and show that the company is in violation, in my mind, it's a no brainer to pursue. I guess time will tell.

Denny

There are still some north pilot pay issues going back to before soc that have not been persued...I suppose the sniper is "selective" and for those of us affected Mick Jagger put it very well in I CAN'T GET NO SATISFACTION...we do need a Denny Crane...

DAL73n 07-01-2012 02:16 AM

The thing that would make me happy to be wrong about is that the last NNP put out about the company's business plan that showed a need (with retirements and growth) of over 2900 pilots by 2016 would be fine. In order to hit that the company would have to start hiring this fall and keep hiring through the duration of this contract.

shiznit 07-01-2012 02:50 AM


Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp (Post 1222511)
The list will have to have shrunk further by well over 1000 for him not to flow by 2015. (i.e. no hiring at all despite the massive retirements coming)

How about setting something more realistic?

How about roughly 250 CPZ flows by the amendable date.

Everybody is going to have 'mo money and 'mo time off too!

I think that VA or the other VA are going to end up in a JV with us, and we are going to be very glad we have protections on that front.

Ball Breaker 07-01-2012 04:01 AM

One huge concern I have with this deal is the precedent we just set:

We will play nicely during negotiations if you promise new airplanes. Unless there are some too good to pass up deal or M&A activity, we may not hear anything about the so called "wide body" order until we start approaching the next amendable date. Then we'll hear the new WBs will only work if they had more 76 seaters to feed them. Hope I'm wrong.

acl65pilot 07-01-2012 07:25 AM


Originally Posted by shiznit (Post 1222576)
How about roughly 250 CPZ flows by the amendable date.

Everybody is going to have 'mo money and 'mo time off too!

I think that VA or the other VA are going to end up in a JV with us, and we are going to be very glad we have protections on that front.

I suspect the V Australia will be come a JV and the revenue sharing portion will be good. That is what it was put in there fore, and the reason I suspect the actual JV was delayed; so we could get it in there.

I also suspect V Atlantic will become one was well. One of two possibilities. They become part of a three way AFKLMAZ, DAL, VA deal and we got ourselves 37.5% of all of that flying outside of the JV in the new PWA......

acl65pilot 07-01-2012 07:26 AM


Originally Posted by shiznit (Post 1222576)
How about roughly 250 CPZ flows by the amendable date.

Everybody is going to have 'mo money and 'mo time off too!

I think that VA or the other VA are going to end up in a JV with us, and we are going to be very glad we have protections on that front.

That would be full throttle this year and beyond. Esp if you are stating that by 270 days prior to the opener. Max is 25% of their list a year.

80ktsClamp 07-01-2012 12:02 PM


Originally Posted by shiznit (Post 1222576)
How about roughly 250 CPZ flows by the amendable date.

Everybody is going to have 'mo money and 'mo time off too!

I think that VA or the other VA are going to end up in a JV with us, and we are going to be very glad we have protections on that front.

We know you think you're right... you reframed and avoided the question- what would make you go "well that wasn't such a good deal after all?"

I hope you are right, too. But man up like everyone else did and say you threshold realistically for admitting you probably voted the wrong way.

acl65pilot 07-01-2012 12:14 PM

Frankly, there will be avid hiring for the 717's and retirements. Much of it will start later next year. The loss of the positions will be hard to break down in a SLI, but they will be there.

In the end it does not matter, we agreed to it.

80ktsClamp 07-01-2012 12:16 PM


Originally Posted by acl65pilot (Post 1222767)
Frankly, there will be avid hiring for the 717's and retirements. Much of it will start later next year. The loss of the positions will be hard to break down in a SLI, but they will be there.

In the end it does not matter, we agreed to it.

Yep... now waiting for the other foot to fall on the next step.

tsquare 07-01-2012 12:34 PM


Originally Posted by Ball Breaker (Post 1222583)
One huge concern I have with this deal is the precedent we just set:

We will play nicely during negotiations if you promise new airplanes. Unless there are some too good to pass up deal or M&A activity, we may not hear anything about the so called "wide body" order until we start approaching the next amendable date. Then we'll hear the new WBs will only work if they had more 76 seaters to feed them. Hope I'm wrong.

There is a HUGE difference between a promise and a guarantee. This agreement guarantees "new" airplanes.

The rest of your post is paranoid speculation. Enjoy the moment we have now.. It is a nice win.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:07 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands