|
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1222814)
shiz- Thank you for finally responding without the sarcasm.
I used to enjoy your posts as well, but you've become sarcastic, condescending, and defensive up until this post. Maybe it's time for some introspection as well? FWIW- I'm far from an unhappy camper, and will take a close look at what could be considered whining and think twice. Just because I disagree does not make me an unhappy camper, though. Soccer Underboob in honor of the UEFA Cup and to signify moving forward?http://www.demotivationalposters.org...1276847307.jpg http://coedmagazine.com/2011/06/23/s...-underboob-40/ |
Originally Posted by shiznit
(Post 1222837)
Didn't realize that, I'll take a breather before I post on heavy topics.
Soccer Underboob in honor of the UEFA Cup and to signify moving forward?http://www.demotivationalposters.org...1276847307.jpg http://coedmagazine.com/2011/06/23/s...-underboob-40/ I wonder if there's anyway I can get the extra money this month in dollar bills? It's been dry in GA and I'm gonna make it rain! |
Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
(Post 1222384)
...Look, I'm sorry if this hurts Comair, but this TA was a good deal.
There were two types of Delta pilots posting on APC - those that believe Anderson is clever enough to create and utilize these loopholes, and those that believe Anderson would never think of taking advantage of the pilot group. As I've watched my pilot group get rolled time and time again by DAL management, you can guess how I feel about Anderson's motives and intentions. Anyway, I appreciate you all taking the time to listen to my concerns and maybe give them some critical thought. |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1222799)
(sigh)
You stated you don't like lies and half truths, so care to show us the exact line(s) in section 1 where it guarantees the new aircraft? The legal language for a guarantee is quite specific, so it should be easy for you to quote. My dog didn't eat my homework. |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1222966)
No. You can read. It is there in black and white. You want to read something into it that is not there, and I am not going to provide argument fodder for you.
My dog didn't eat my homework. I'm challenging you to put up what you're asserting with chapter and verse. And just so you don't reframe again, I'm telling you to post chapter and verse what does this:
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1222783)
There is a HUGE difference between a promise and a guarantee. This agreement guarantees "new" airplanes.
|
Originally Posted by shiznit
(Post 1222811)
Since nothing as satisfied you yet, this is it. We KNOW you are an unhappy camper and voted no. I used to enjoy you and T, but both of you are becoming whiny, combative posters.
If: UCAL has a contract with rates 15% better than ours by 2015, scope that prevents JV without 50% UCAL pilots, brings their RJ cap below 450 (ALL UAX, not the selective 51-76 seat jets), the USAirways codeshare with UCAL to less than 10% and no int'l. code.(an AMR merger doesn't count), and workrule enhancements to require all recalls and hiring before 2014. OR If SWA gets a new contract in the next 12 months that has rates+DC above 260/hr. OR Lumberg fails his 717 upgrade course, Bar AE's to a Douglas product, and PG starts to commute.:D |
Originally Posted by TenYearsGone
(Post 1222819)
It will take a promise and an IRONCLAD clause that has a poison pill. The clause will emphasize our SCOPE:
1) no more LARGE "type" 76 seater or greater in the DCI network 2) not allowed to add to the 450 DCI cap, at all costs 3) Anything more or larger will be flown by mainline pilots If, in 10 years (Yes, I said 10 years) we are still at the 450 Cap and have not converted the 76 seaters to 90 seaters, I will apologize for my "newfound" lack of trust towards ALPA and the company. TEN |
Originally Posted by shiznit
(Post 1222831)
IMHO, they can have 100 more 76's if:
1) 80 more SNB's 2) They swap out the remaining 70's and 50's in a 2.2 for 1 swap 3) New DCI cap is 323 4) Domestic block hour ratio rises 2-1.(or higher) 5) JV prod. balance floor is 48% 6) ALK drops to 25% system wide. 7) Int'l. CS is 30% of any leg that touches the US 8) Int'l. CS is max of 40% of the seats on any "beyond" flying, calculated by city pair. 9) No GTF powered airframes at DCI, all GTF or next-gen powerplants will be operated by mainline pilots. That would drop DCI seats by another 15.5%, DCI hull reduction of 28%, and a block hour shift to mainline of an additional 16%. That's just me though. |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1222968)
It's not in there, t. That's my point.
I'm challenging you to put up what you're asserting with chapter and verse. And just so you don't reframe again, I'm telling you to post chapter and verse what does this: |
Originally Posted by shiznit
(Post 1222811)
Since nothing as satisfied you yet, this is it. We KNOW you are an unhappy camper and voted no. I used to enjoy you and T, but both of you are becoming whiny, combative posters.
If: UCAL has a contract with rates 15% better than ours by 2015, scope that prevents JV without 50% UCAL pilots, brings their RJ cap below 450 (ALL UAX, not the selective 51-76 seat jets), the USAirways codeshare with UCAL to less than 10% and no int'l. code.(an AMR merger doesn't count), and workrule enhancements to require all recalls and hiring before 2014. OR If SWA gets a new contract in the next 12 months that has rates+DC above 260/hr. OR Lumberg fails his 717 upgrade course, Bar AE's to a Douglas product, and PG starts to commute.:D |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:35 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands