Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Tracking Regional Outsourcing >

Tracking Regional Outsourcing

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Tracking Regional Outsourcing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-26-2013 | 09:39 AM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
From: Doing what you do, for less.
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
What the company wanted to do was extremely obvious. This isn't a case of hindsight 20/20... it's exactly as I predicted.
Reply
Old 06-26-2013 | 02:31 PM
  #62  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by flybywire44
They are in part DC-9 replacement aircraft.
Sadly, yes they are.

Carl
Reply
Old 06-26-2013 | 02:47 PM
  #63  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7
You say 70 76 large RJs were added (Only 40 firm orders so far) to counteract Shiz saying DCI aircraft were reduced by 148...
I didn't state that to counteract shiznit, I stated that fact because shiznit omitted it.

Originally Posted by Trip7
...but failed to mention that 88 firm 717s are in the process of being added to mainline.
There is no requirement for those 717's to be growth aircraft. They get the additional 70 jumbo RJ's even if the 717's are used to replace current mainline airframes. Think DC-9's and older A319's and A320's.

Originally Posted by Trip7
Its a big shift of seats from regional to mainline, a step in the right direction, and a good win by ALPA.
Not if mainline jets are replaced by the 717. If that happens, the only thing we will have done is give management 70 additional jumbo RJ's that would have been disallowed by the previous contract.

Originally Posted by Trip7
Mainline jobs are being added, while DCI jobs are being reduced is a nice first step.
Since the contract signing, no mainline jobs have been added. Our seniority list has gone down by 250 numbers.

Originally Posted by Trip7
Delta only had 30 something DC-9s flying around. On a frame for frame basis, one could argue the used MD-90s have already replaced the DC9s and the 717s are pure growth.
You sound like our management/union. One can only argue growth when there is actual growth. There has been none. No growth in aircraft, no growth in pilots.

Carl
Reply
Old 06-26-2013 | 04:21 PM
  #64  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 5
From: 737 Left
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
What the company wanted to do was extremely obvious. This isn't a case of hindsight 20/20... it's exactly as I predicted and what I argued during the vote debate.
Louder next time!!
Reply
Old 06-26-2013 | 04:30 PM
  #65  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by AtlCSIP
Louder next time!!
Clamp couldn't have been louder. Just like I couldn't have been louder. But it doesn't matter when you're represented by a national union that is hell bent on keeping the RJ experiment viable at the expense of mainline growth.

Carl
Reply
Old 06-26-2013 | 06:58 PM
  #66  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 5
From: 737 Left
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Clamp couldn't have been louder. Just like I couldn't have been louder. But it doesn't matter when you're represented by a national union that is hell bent on keeping the RJ experiment viable at the expense of mainline growth.

Carl
I wish we could just move all the RJ's over to mainline. Yeah yeah yeah, preaching to the choir. I know. And I know I would be out of a job, but better for everybody in the long run
Reply
Old 06-26-2013 | 07:13 PM
  #67  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: FAA
Default

Close; if you are flying regional jets to undercut mainline salaries you are the problem.

Originally Posted by 8hourrule
If these numbers surprise you then you are part of the problem.
Reply
Old 06-26-2013 | 09:32 PM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
From: CRJ 900
Default

Originally Posted by 152SIC
Close; if you are flying regional jets to undercut mainline salaries you are the problem.
The problem is that every time this comes up for a vote mainline keeps giving this stuff up for small incremental increases that ultimately get eroded in bankruptcy. You really want a change; take all the flying back, turbo-props included. Swallow the pill and get a national seniority list with standardized pay scales and benefits. Get it in your contract that no flying can be done by pilots not part of what ever union you decide on. Lastly stop pointing the finger at each-others pilot groups as the problem. While you argue and blame each others industry as the problem management laughs all the way to the bank with your pensions, pay, and general quality of life. Ask yourself how many bonus's have handsomely retired your CEO's while you bicker.
Reply
Old 06-27-2013 | 06:17 AM
  #69  
shiznit's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,642
Likes: 0
From: right for a long, long time
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
shiz- notice how the company has drawn down the 50 seaters earlier than required by the contract and has shown intention to operate 76 seaters at below the maximum amount.

We got meager pay increases and gave workrules concessions in exchange for allowing the company to do what it wanted to do anyways. How is that in any way a victory?
I'm pleased they are able to draw down some 50's ahead of plan.

If a Company pays you for 70 widgets and then realizes they only need 40 widgets, AND have to pay you for the 30 widgets they don't want even if they never use them; Who got the better end of the deal?

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
..the company was going to do what it wanted to do anyways,
That means you believe that the Delta Pilots had NO LEVERAGE.

The Company then gave away over $1.5 BILLION to their pilots over the next 3.5 and they didn't have to, WHAT?

As a shareholder, I'm furious! AMR, UAL, CAL and LCC each made their pilots negotiate for YEARS without new deals, saving their Corps. hundreds of millions, if not BILLIONS of dollars, money that could be used to make my stock worth more...
Reply
Old 06-27-2013 | 06:38 AM
  #70  
shiznit's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,642
Likes: 0
From: right for a long, long time
Default

Originally Posted by flybywire44
Lets keep in mind that ALPA cannot negotiate any scope changes that will drastically hurt ALPA regional airlines. Absolutely incorrect. Show me what ALPA RJ group has seen a benefit from the improved DAL scope clause. Lee Moak signed the DAL PWA. So make no mistake when I tell you that ALPA National represents regional airlines and through that representation regional ALPA carriers have influence in Delta's scope negotiations. WRONG. You need to contact your rep, whoever has told you that regional pilot groups can limit mainline scope either doesn't understand or is lying to you.

Delta would have done anything to get rid of the 50 seaters. *I agree, they got desperate last spring. They would have done to their other regionals what they did to Comair and Mesa—The 50 seats would have gone away anyway. Yes, and it would have taken the next decade to do it. CAL was ready to hold the line, but AMR's Bankruptcy and US Airways's weak union leadership presented liability. Yep, all airline pilots are impacted by the weakness of "independent unions"
*If DAL Inc. would have been a little more patient and waited just a couple more months, they would have been able to use the PNCL acquisition to achieve almost all the DCI shrinkage goals they had on their own, and the Delta Pilots would have had little to no leverage at that point.
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices