Jetblue movement...
#91
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,252
Likes: 48
From: 190 captain and “Pro-pilot”
If the AA/UsAir merger goes thru (which it's not looking as good as it did last week with the government public opposing the merger as is) then UsAir will be a great way to get yourself a senority number at the worlds largest airline. If not JB currently is lookin at 3-5 years for upgrade to 190 captain and 5-7 for upgrade to 320 captain with the current aircraft orders and that doesn't include recalls leaving. Total compensation AA is far better than JB but UsAir isn't, you can roll the dice and go to USAIR and you may end up great you may also end up stuck at USAIR.
I think we are now a big target.
#92
Line Holder
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 64
Usair will retire roughly 50% of their pilots in the next 10 years. With a union the can negotiate better pay/benefits. They already have better retirement and insurance than JetBlue. More varied flying and real international flying. While the upgrade may be fast at JetBlue based on current retirements and expansion you may be on serve indefinitely. That is not a knock on the airline it's just the fact of a very young pilot group. The expansion is limited in that each new routes typically means reduced service in another city. For example DCA was heralded as growth when in reality is simply mean shifting flying from IAD.
Whether USair merges or not its still retiring massive amounts of pilots. 190 reserve for a career or potential 757,330 international?
Whether USair merges or not its still retiring massive amounts of pilots. 190 reserve for a career or potential 757,330 international?
#93
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,252
Likes: 48
From: 190 captain and “Pro-pilot”
Usair will retire roughly 50% of their pilots in the next 10 years. With a union the can negotiate better pay/benefits. They already have better retirement and insurance than JetBlue. More varied flying and real international flying. While the upgrade may be fast at JetBlue based on current retirements and expansion you may be on serve indefinitely. That is not a knock on the airline it's just the fact of a very young pilot group. The expansion is limited in that each new routes typically means reduced service in another city. For example DCA was heralded as growth when in reality is simply mean shifting flying from IAD.
Whether USair merges or not its still retiring massive amounts of pilots. 190 reserve for a career or potential 757,330 international?
Whether USair merges or not its still retiring massive amounts of pilots. 190 reserve for a career or potential 757,330 international?
But did you look at the pay rates?
They can't even figure out what union they want over there.
So lets say the merger does not go do you think Parker is going
to give them a big raise?
If they merge good deal but remember before Parker was running around saying Airways couldn't make it without one.
If you want to move up super fast Airways will def give you that.
As for DCA we got the slots but we were short planes.
How often do DCA slots come up? We can grow IAD anytime we want.
If we want the business guy it's all DCA they hate IAD.
I would love to see more IAD but everyone has a hard time making that place work.
#94
All airlines are a gamble.
Just a few days ago Airways guys thought they had it made now what? There is movement at JetBlue only Spirit is getting more planes than us. I have moved up pretty quick and its 3 years to a 190 RESERVE captain. Just remember the Airways guys were furloughed they didn't come here for movement.
Just a few days ago Airways guys thought they had it made now what? There is movement at JetBlue only Spirit is getting more planes than us. I have moved up pretty quick and its 3 years to a 190 RESERVE captain. Just remember the Airways guys were furloughed they didn't come here for movement.
I think for anyone hired today to realistically plan on anything less than a ten year upgrade is just being optimistic. That is planning on ONLY planned growth and KNOWN attrition.
I believe it will be shorter than that but it simply cant be taken into the equation that its a fast upgrade here. When I was hired at my regional it was a less than a year upgrade....for the guys who had been there a little less than a year. It was closer to 3 for the guys who were hired after that point.
#95
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,252
Likes: 48
From: 190 captain and “Pro-pilot”
Keep in mind this is only today, for pilots hired 3 years ago. I do not believe that upgrade is one year away for me. It is still a sort of "false" upgrade as there are many who bypass for QOL. As the 4-6 year folks who bypassed realize that they can hold a CA line, they will start to upgrade and move the time frame back.
I think for anyone hired today to realistically plan on anything less than a ten year upgrade is just being optimistic. That is planning on ONLY planned growth and KNOWN attrition.
I believe it will be shorter than that but it simply cant be taken into the equation that its a fast upgrade here. When I was hired at my regional it was a less than a year upgrade....for the guys who had been there a little less than a year. It was closer to 3 for the guys who were hired after that point.
I think for anyone hired today to realistically plan on anything less than a ten year upgrade is just being optimistic. That is planning on ONLY planned growth and KNOWN attrition.
I believe it will be shorter than that but it simply cant be taken into the equation that its a fast upgrade here. When I was hired at my regional it was a less than a year upgrade....for the guys who had been there a little less than a year. It was closer to 3 for the guys who were hired after that point.
Good point
#96
Keep in mind this is only today, for pilots hired 3 years ago. I do not believe that upgrade is one year away for me. It is still a sort of "false" upgrade as there are many who bypass for QOL. As the 4-6 year folks who bypassed realize that they can hold a CA line, they will start to upgrade and move the time frame back.
I think for anyone hired today to realistically plan on anything less than a ten year upgrade is just being optimistic. That is planning on ONLY planned growth and KNOWN attrition.
I believe it will be shorter than that but it simply cant be taken into the equation that its a fast upgrade here. When I was hired at my regional it was a less than a year upgrade....for the guys who had been there a little less than a year. It was closer to 3 for the guys who were hired after that point.
I think for anyone hired today to realistically plan on anything less than a ten year upgrade is just being optimistic. That is planning on ONLY planned growth and KNOWN attrition.
I believe it will be shorter than that but it simply cant be taken into the equation that its a fast upgrade here. When I was hired at my regional it was a less than a year upgrade....for the guys who had been there a little less than a year. It was closer to 3 for the guys who were hired after that point.
#97
Line Holder
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 64
I agree with most of this.
But did you look at the pay rates?
They can't even figure out what union they want over there.
So lets say the merger does not go do you think Parker is going
to give them a big raise?
If they merge good deal but remember before Parker was running around saying Airways couldn't make it without one.
If you want to move up super fast Airways will def give you that.
As for DCA we got the slots but we were short planes.
How often do DCA slots come up? We can grow IAD anytime we want.
If we want the business guy it's all DCA they hate IAD.
I would love to see more IAD but everyone has a hard time making that place work.
But did you look at the pay rates?
They can't even figure out what union they want over there.
So lets say the merger does not go do you think Parker is going
to give them a big raise?
If they merge good deal but remember before Parker was running around saying Airways couldn't make it without one.
If you want to move up super fast Airways will def give you that.
As for DCA we got the slots but we were short planes.
How often do DCA slots come up? We can grow IAD anytime we want.
If we want the business guy it's all DCA they hate IAD.
I would love to see more IAD but everyone has a hard time making that place work.
As for what the CEO says I lump him in with Barger when he claims if a union is voted in he'll sell Jetblue. Thats just preying on the gullible which, mind you, we have quite a few.
My assertion with the DCA/IAD comparison is our "growth" is often attributed to new cities which usually means a reduction in frequency elsewhere. Also, as we announce new aircraft orders we typically don't announce lease backs. The rationale for that is lessors often change the terms and jetblue can decide to renew the lease. In short the net aircraft growth changes more frequently than the acronym used to sell us a new insurance/pay/benefits scheme.
As for the upgrades I remember being told to tell interview candidates back in 04'/05' that they would be Airbus captains in 2-3 years. Maybe its what the airline believed back then, who knows.
#98
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,150
Likes: 0
From: Left,Right, Left, Right,Right,Left, Right, Left
From the pvc today.
Based on pilot questions and feedback to the PVC, we see our pilots have a broad misunderstanding how different this year’s PEA process is from the procedures utilized in 2011. The PVC is neither a partner nor participant in the drafting of JetBlue’s PEA amendment. The PVC is a focus group in this process precisely as the pilots who attended the Flight Operations [PEA] focus group dinners. Unlike the PEA amendment of 2011, JetBlue is not seeking the endorsement from the PVC or a majority vote of acceptance from the Pilot Group on this year’s amendment.
Last edited by johnso29; 08-15-2013 at 04:27 PM.
#99
Line Holder
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 64
Talk to any PVC member and they will tell you flat out how bad we are getting screwed yet the pilot group just doesn't get it. They are honestly poking the bear with these emails. The airline has routinely threatened to fire them yet they press on in our best interest.
How does the pilot group respond...
How does the pilot group respond...
#100
Based on pilot questions and feedback to the PVC, we see our pilots have a broad misunderstanding how different this year’s PEA process is from the procedures utilized in 2011. The PVC is neither a partner nor participant in the drafting of JetBlue’s PEA amendment. The PVC is a focus group in this process precisely as the pilots who attended the Flight Operations [PEA] focus group dinners. Unlike the PEA amendment of 2011, JetBlue is not seeking the endorsement from the PVC or a majority vote of acceptance from the Pilot Group on this year’s amendment.
So does this mean the PAR team will just email us our updated PEA?
Great! Ok well now that I am clear on that I have nothing to worry about!! I don't have to worry about signing anything so one less thing to do......... I hope u feel the sarcasm there. Unreal.
Last edited by johnso29; 08-15-2013 at 04:28 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



