Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Jetblue movement...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-15-2013 | 05:22 AM
  #91  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,252
Likes: 48
From: 190 captain and “Pro-pilot”
Default

Originally Posted by Climbto450
If the AA/UsAir merger goes thru (which it's not looking as good as it did last week with the government public opposing the merger as is) then UsAir will be a great way to get yourself a senority number at the worlds largest airline. If not JB currently is lookin at 3-5 years for upgrade to 190 captain and 5-7 for upgrade to 320 captain with the current aircraft orders and that doesn't include recalls leaving. Total compensation AA is far better than JB but UsAir isn't, you can roll the dice and go to USAIR and you may end up great you may also end up stuck at USAIR.
Or go to Blue and end up at American.(or on the street)
I think we are now a big target.
Old 08-15-2013 | 05:41 AM
  #92  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 64
Default

Usair will retire roughly 50% of their pilots in the next 10 years. With a union the can negotiate better pay/benefits. They already have better retirement and insurance than JetBlue. More varied flying and real international flying. While the upgrade may be fast at JetBlue based on current retirements and expansion you may be on serve indefinitely. That is not a knock on the airline it's just the fact of a very young pilot group. The expansion is limited in that each new routes typically means reduced service in another city. For example DCA was heralded as growth when in reality is simply mean shifting flying from IAD.

Whether USair merges or not its still retiring massive amounts of pilots. 190 reserve for a career or potential 757,330 international?
Old 08-15-2013 | 06:04 AM
  #93  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,252
Likes: 48
From: 190 captain and “Pro-pilot”
Default

Originally Posted by benzoate
Usair will retire roughly 50% of their pilots in the next 10 years. With a union the can negotiate better pay/benefits. They already have better retirement and insurance than JetBlue. More varied flying and real international flying. While the upgrade may be fast at JetBlue based on current retirements and expansion you may be on serve indefinitely. That is not a knock on the airline it's just the fact of a very young pilot group. The expansion is limited in that each new routes typically means reduced service in another city. For example DCA was heralded as growth when in reality is simply mean shifting flying from IAD.

Whether USair merges or not its still retiring massive amounts of pilots. 190 reserve for a career or potential 757,330 international?
I agree with most of this.
But did you look at the pay rates?
They can't even figure out what union they want over there.
So lets say the merger does not go do you think Parker is going
to give them a big raise?
If they merge good deal but remember before Parker was running around saying Airways couldn't make it without one.
If you want to move up super fast Airways will def give you that.

As for DCA we got the slots but we were short planes.
How often do DCA slots come up? We can grow IAD anytime we want.
If we want the business guy it's all DCA they hate IAD.
I would love to see more IAD but everyone has a hard time making that place work.
Old 08-15-2013 | 07:10 AM
  #94  
usmc-sgt's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,077
Likes: 40
Default

Originally Posted by pilotpayne
All airlines are a gamble.
Just a few days ago Airways guys thought they had it made now what? There is movement at JetBlue only Spirit is getting more planes than us. I have moved up pretty quick and its 3 years to a 190 RESERVE captain. Just remember the Airways guys were furloughed they didn't come here for movement.
Keep in mind this is only today, for pilots hired 3 years ago. I do not believe that upgrade is one year away for me. It is still a sort of "false" upgrade as there are many who bypass for QOL. As the 4-6 year folks who bypassed realize that they can hold a CA line, they will start to upgrade and move the time frame back.

I think for anyone hired today to realistically plan on anything less than a ten year upgrade is just being optimistic. That is planning on ONLY planned growth and KNOWN attrition.

I believe it will be shorter than that but it simply cant be taken into the equation that its a fast upgrade here. When I was hired at my regional it was a less than a year upgrade....for the guys who had been there a little less than a year. It was closer to 3 for the guys who were hired after that point.
Old 08-15-2013 | 08:09 AM
  #95  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,252
Likes: 48
From: 190 captain and “Pro-pilot”
Default

Originally Posted by usmc-sgt
Keep in mind this is only today, for pilots hired 3 years ago. I do not believe that upgrade is one year away for me. It is still a sort of "false" upgrade as there are many who bypass for QOL. As the 4-6 year folks who bypassed realize that they can hold a CA line, they will start to upgrade and move the time frame back.

I think for anyone hired today to realistically plan on anything less than a ten year upgrade is just being optimistic. That is planning on ONLY planned growth and KNOWN attrition.

I believe it will be shorter than that but it simply cant be taken into the equation that its a fast upgrade here. When I was hired at my regional it was a less than a year upgrade....for the guys who had been there a little less than a year. It was closer to 3 for the guys who were hired after that point.

Good point
Old 08-15-2013 | 09:00 AM
  #96  
labbats's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,347
Likes: 0
From: A320
Default

Originally Posted by usmc-sgt
Keep in mind this is only today, for pilots hired 3 years ago. I do not believe that upgrade is one year away for me. It is still a sort of "false" upgrade as there are many who bypass for QOL. As the 4-6 year folks who bypassed realize that they can hold a CA line, they will start to upgrade and move the time frame back.

I think for anyone hired today to realistically plan on anything less than a ten year upgrade is just being optimistic. That is planning on ONLY planned growth and KNOWN attrition.

I believe it will be shorter than that but it simply cant be taken into the equation that its a fast upgrade here. When I was hired at my regional it was a less than a year upgrade....for the guys who had been there a little less than a year. It was closer to 3 for the guys who were hired after that point.
Don't go making sense about newhire upgrades on a pilot message board. You're preaching to the same people that look at the time enroute on the FMS in cruise at .79M and telling that arrival time to the passengers. Never mind the fact that you'll have to slow and descend.
Old 08-15-2013 | 09:46 AM
  #97  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 64
Default

Originally Posted by pilotpayne
I agree with most of this.
But did you look at the pay rates?
They can't even figure out what union they want over there.
So lets say the merger does not go do you think Parker is going
to give them a big raise?
If they merge good deal but remember before Parker was running around saying Airways couldn't make it without one.
If you want to move up super fast Airways will def give you that.

As for DCA we got the slots but we were short planes.
How often do DCA slots come up? We can grow IAD anytime we want.
If we want the business guy it's all DCA they hate IAD.
I would love to see more IAD but everyone has a hard time making that place work.
Their pay rates are low and can only go up. From what I gather once they can put their ego's aside and merge the list AND operations the raises will then be negotiated.
As for what the CEO says I lump him in with Barger when he claims if a union is voted in he'll sell Jetblue. Thats just preying on the gullible which, mind you, we have quite a few.
My assertion with the DCA/IAD comparison is our "growth" is often attributed to new cities which usually means a reduction in frequency elsewhere. Also, as we announce new aircraft orders we typically don't announce lease backs. The rationale for that is lessors often change the terms and jetblue can decide to renew the lease. In short the net aircraft growth changes more frequently than the acronym used to sell us a new insurance/pay/benefits scheme.
As for the upgrades I remember being told to tell interview candidates back in 04'/05' that they would be Airbus captains in 2-3 years. Maybe its what the airline believed back then, who knows.
Old 08-15-2013 | 11:12 AM
  #98  
CaptCoolHand's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,150
Likes: 0
From: Left,Right, Left, Right,Right,Left, Right, Left
Default

From the pvc today.

Based on pilot questions and feedback to the PVC, we see our pilots have a broad misunderstanding how different this year’s PEA process is from the procedures utilized in 2011. The PVC is neither a partner nor participant in the drafting of JetBlue’s PEA amendment. The PVC is a focus group in this process precisely as the pilots who attended the Flight Operations [PEA] focus group dinners. Unlike the PEA amendment of 2011, JetBlue is not seeking the endorsement from the PVC or a majority vote of acceptance from the Pilot Group on this year’s amendment.

Last edited by johnso29; 08-15-2013 at 04:27 PM.
Old 08-15-2013 | 11:45 AM
  #99  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 64
Default

Talk to any PVC member and they will tell you flat out how bad we are getting screwed yet the pilot group just doesn't get it. They are honestly poking the bear with these emails. The airline has routinely threatened to fire them yet they press on in our best interest.

How does the pilot group respond...
Old 08-15-2013 | 11:47 AM
  #100  
cmesoar's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: FO
Default

Originally Posted by CaptCoolHand
From the pvc today.
Based on pilot questions and feedback to the PVC, we see our pilots have a broad misunderstanding how different this year’s PEA process is from the procedures utilized in 2011. The PVC is neither a partner nor participant in the drafting of JetBlue’s PEA amendment. The PVC is a focus group in this process precisely as the pilots who attended the Flight Operations [PEA] focus group dinners. Unlike the PEA amendment of 2011, JetBlue is not seeking the endorsement from the PVC or a majority vote of acceptance from the Pilot Group on this year’s amendment.




So does this mean the PAR team will just email us our updated PEA?

Great! Ok well now that I am clear on that I have nothing to worry about!! I don't have to worry about signing anything so one less thing to do......... I hope u feel the sarcasm there. Unreal.

Last edited by johnso29; 08-15-2013 at 04:28 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
P-3Bubba
Major
174
04-23-2014 06:14 AM
LuvJockey
Major
14
03-15-2012 03:30 PM
Gman
Major
34
04-12-2007 08:43 PM
mike734
JetBlue
8
02-14-2006 11:07 PM
Sir James
Major
0
07-29-2005 07:02 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices