Delta Representation Discussion
#661
I understand now. It's okay to put stickers on the plane that may potentially confuse mechanics not because they are bogus MEL stickers but because they might not be seen for part of the flight. The stickers that someone has to scrape off in the lounge, on the TV and in the plane are okay with you because they might be hidden from normal view. Thanks for setting me straight on the because it's hidden it doesn't hurt anyone.
#662
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
So I'm the only guy who opens the chart clip to place jepps in it? Reaching a little aren't we? I find the jepp binder stuffed into it all the time when it comes in from an all night first commuter flight out trash bag left half drank diet cokes left explosion. Who does that - the jepp pixies? You think it's okay to leave bogus MELs in the plane. That's fine I don't they are cute just not stuck in my plane. You find that emotional? You like cranberry drinks?
#663
So I'm the only guy who opens the chart clip to place jepps in it? Reaching a little aren't we? I find the jepp binder stuffed into it all the time when it comes in from an all night first commuter flight out trash bag left half drank diet cokes left explosion. Who does that - the jepp pixies? You think it's okay to leave bogus MELs in the plane. That's fine I don't they are cute just not stuck in my plane. You find that emotional? You like cranberry drinks?
#664
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
We're not the representing agent yet RBF. As such, it's the respectful thing to do if management respectfully asks for you not to stop your communication activities...but to simply move.
I can't help but notice however (yet again) that the mob is focused on this stuff as opposed to a DPA versus ALPA discussion.
Carl
I can't help but notice however (yet again) that the mob is focused on this stuff as opposed to a DPA versus ALPA discussion.
Carl
#665
Can't abide NAI
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
You know ... when you see your representational adversary digging themselves a hole ...
Carl Sir, you guys should put those stickers on everything. Windshields of Police Cruisers, random babies at public places, over the top of the Widget by the door on that first brick building to your left as you turn from Virginia Ave. to Delta Ave., in Atlanta. Start referencing Jihad and AlQueda in your e-mails about bombing airplane logbooks with those stickers. Man they're great, funnier than watching Mad Mad World with Lewis CK and Stephen Cobert over at your house. Man keep it up!
Next Stop ... China ... dig man dig!
encourage them.
Carl Sir, you guys should put those stickers on everything. Windshields of Police Cruisers, random babies at public places, over the top of the Widget by the door on that first brick building to your left as you turn from Virginia Ave. to Delta Ave., in Atlanta. Start referencing Jihad and AlQueda in your e-mails about bombing airplane logbooks with those stickers. Man they're great, funnier than watching Mad Mad World with Lewis CK and Stephen Cobert over at your house. Man keep it up!
Next Stop ... China ... dig man dig!
Last edited by Bucking Bar; 09-20-2013 at 08:29 PM.
#666
Moderator
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
I didn't dance around the question because you're an Internet character claiming to know about pilots being in the lounge one day, and in the terminal next. Got news for you ace, that's not proof.
Proof would be a video showing pilots breaking company rules on company property. Or a memo from the CPO stating rules were broken on company property. You have none of that.
A much more likely scenario is the CP asking the pilots to please move to the terminal. And even though no rules were or are being broken, the pilots moved to the terminal to respect the CP's wishes.
Continue your rent-a-mob soldiering though to over dramatize respectful behavior.
Carl
Proof would be a video showing pilots breaking company rules on company property. Or a memo from the CPO stating rules were broken on company property. You have none of that.
A much more likely scenario is the CP asking the pilots to please move to the terminal. And even though no rules were or are being broken, the pilots moved to the terminal to respect the CP's wishes.
Continue your rent-a-mob soldiering though to over dramatize respectful behavior.
Carl
Rent-a-mob soldiering? That's funny Carl. Hypocritical too.
#667
You know ... when you see your representational adversary digging themselves a hole ...
Carl Sir, you guys should put those stickers on everything. Windshields of Police Cruisers, random babies at public places, over the top of the Widget by the door on that first brick building to your left as you turn from Virginia Ave. to Delta Ave., in Atlanta. Start referencing Jihad and AlQueda in your e-mails about bombing airplane logbooks with those stickers. Man they're great, funnier than watching Mad Mad World with Lewis CK and Stephen Cobert over at your house. Man keep it up!
Next Stop ... China ... dig man dig!
encourage them.
Carl Sir, you guys should put those stickers on everything. Windshields of Police Cruisers, random babies at public places, over the top of the Widget by the door on that first brick building to your left as you turn from Virginia Ave. to Delta Ave., in Atlanta. Start referencing Jihad and AlQueda in your e-mails about bombing airplane logbooks with those stickers. Man they're great, funnier than watching Mad Mad World with Lewis CK and Stephen Cobert over at your house. Man keep it up!
Next Stop ... China ... dig man dig!

Carl
#668
Moderator
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
I didn't dance around the question because you're an Internet character claiming to know about pilots being in the lounge one day, and in the terminal next. Got news for you ace, that's not proof.
Proof would be a video showing pilots breaking company rules on company property. Or a memo from the CPO stating rules were broken on company property. You have none of that.
A much more likely scenario is the CP asking the pilots to please move to the terminal. And even though no rules were or are being broken, the pilots moved to the terminal to respect the CP's wishes.
Continue your rent-a-mob soldiering though to over dramatize respectful behavior.
Carl
Proof would be a video showing pilots breaking company rules on company property. Or a memo from the CPO stating rules were broken on company property. You have none of that.
A much more likely scenario is the CP asking the pilots to please move to the terminal. And even though no rules were or are being broken, the pilots moved to the terminal to respect the CP's wishes.
Continue your rent-a-mob soldiering though to over dramatize respectful behavior.
Carl
You really want to believe that proof doesn't exist. And that's ok. But proof does exist. And the existence of said proof is why DPA guys are no longer campaigning in the lounges in JFK. Don't believe me? Shoot an email to Fielding or Caplinger. Perhaps you'll believe them.
#669
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
No, it's NOT ok. Proof is as easy as picking up a phone and making a call. Carl REFUSES to do so. He needs to hold himself and the DPA to the same standards in which he/they bash ALPA. At the minimum, he's being blatantly ignorant, at the most, willfully disingenous. Which one is it Carl?
#670
No he's not. I will view it as an improper MCO. Let maintenance sort it out. Of course I don't usually pull that clip open until right before pushback, so, oh well.... No emotion whatsoever.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



