Search

Notices

Details on Delta TA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-04-2014 | 06:50 AM
  #1421  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by orvil
I completed the survey. I was disturbed by the questions about stock and stock options.

If you were on the property prior to 2000, you have already had your fill of stock options. Put it in my paycheck. I'm still papering the wall with stock options from a bankrupt company.

I feel the same way about profit sharing. No need to negotiate any changes to profit sharing. It's no risk to the Company. It's all risk to the employee. The Company only pays out if there is a profit. The employee doesn't get diddly squat if there isn't a profit.

I'm not quite sure where all the angst is with the profit sharing discussion. Some of you think you are important to the Company. You are not. You are a cost, an employee number. Profit sharing does not change how I safely conduct my business day. It shouldn't change how you conduct business either. I rarely agree with Sailingfun on anything. But, I have to concede his arguments about profit sharing.

Let's concentrate on better work rules, better insurance, better retirement, and working less. Profit sharing just isn't that important.
I have those same worthless stock options you are talking about. I remember them touting the Black Scholes model and how DAL stock was on the way up, yada yada yada... but we now know that the B/S (interesting contraction I see now that I write it) was flawed. But..... and I am not necessarily advocating it... if we got options placed into a trading account that were immediately tradeable, I'd jump on that in a heartbeat.
Reply
Old 09-04-2014 | 06:54 AM
  #1422  
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
At home on the maddog!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,874
Likes: 0
From: Retired (mandatory age 65)
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
Who's mouthpiece are you?
I don't know for sure whether management wants CDO's or not. I suspect they do.

There was someone on here earlier posted that he had flown with SD and that SD really wanted them. Coupled with the staunch DALPA aficionados (who are normally in lock step with whatever management wants) still pounding their arguments in support of CDO's, it sure makes me think this issue is not dead.
Reply
Old 09-04-2014 | 07:04 AM
  #1423  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
I don't know for sure whether management wants CDO's or not. I suspect they do.

There was someone on here earlier posted that he had flown with SD and that SD really wanted them. Coupled with the staunch DALPA aficionados (who are normally in lock step with whatever management wants) still pounding their arguments in support of CDO's, it sure makes me think this issue is not dead.
I'll gladly give them CDOs, but my restrictions would be so onerous they wouldn't want them. 6 hours (non reduceable... ever) behind the door for starters, 10:30 pay... little things like that. Then sailing and all the senior bubbas can fly them to their hearts' content.
Reply
Old 09-04-2014 | 07:27 AM
  #1424  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
Who's mouthpiece are you?

John Malone's.
Reply
Old 09-04-2014 | 07:29 AM
  #1425  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
I don't know for sure whether management wants CDO's or not. I suspect they do.

There was someone on here earlier posted that he had flown with SD and that SD really wanted them. Coupled with the staunch DALPA aficionados (who are normally in lock step with whatever management wants) still pounding their arguments in support of CDO's, it sure makes me think this issue is not dead.
The fact that they were on the survey says it all. Done deal.
Reply
Old 09-04-2014 | 07:30 AM
  #1426  
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
At home on the maddog!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,874
Likes: 0
From: Retired (mandatory age 65)
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
I'll gladly give them CDOs, but my restrictions would be so onerous they wouldn't want them. 6 hours (non reduceable... ever) behind the door for starters, 10:30 pay... little things like that. Then sailing and all the senior bubbas can fly them to their hearts' content.
Yeah, I might could live with that. Hopefully, like you say, management couldn't and then we would be done with the consideration of these horrid things once and for all. I'd also have to have the restriction where no one who didn't want to fly one of these had to. Maybe some kind of opt-in system where if you didn't opt-in then you couldn't be assigned one, even on reserve. And then of course I'd have to check early morning flights before nonreving. That would eliminate some of the nonrev benefit for me. Anyway, as long as I don't have to fly them and I don't have to ride in the back of an airplane with someone flying that morning flight after a CDO... I guess I'm good with it. But then again, I remember how devastating it was when I was at TWA and we lost an airplane full of people... Oh, and I'd also want to not be required to DH on an early morning flight flown by a CDO crew. Actually, the more I think about it... I'm still against them.

Last edited by DAL 88 Driver; 09-04-2014 at 07:43 AM.
Reply
Old 09-04-2014 | 07:35 AM
  #1427  
Check Essential's Avatar
Works Every Weekend
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,506
Likes: 0
From: 737 ATL
Default

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
In actuality, what was occurring was that pilots were there flying full schedules for 3 months and then sitting around for 9 months collecting reserve guarantee as excess. That is where the savings were.

As we have grown flying time, we went from a huge pilot surplus to a measurable pilot shortage. That is what is causing people to feel more flying over this summer. It has nothing to do with work rule changes,
Can't agree with that opinion. We have always been short of pilots in the summer.
Nothing new about that.

I think the main reason people "feel more flying over this summer" has everything to do with work rule changes. ---> We gave management a gigantic productivity concession when we turned July and August into 30 day months. Along with the higher ALVs, now they can cram more flight hours into fewer days.

July and August have always been the limiting factor at this airline. We gave that away for way too cheap.
Reply
Old 09-04-2014 | 07:36 AM
  #1428  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Default

CDOs will be back. Slighty better. The insiders know the pilots dont want them so they will sneak it in C2015.

Stock, stock options. No thank you.
Reply
Old 09-04-2014 | 07:54 AM
  #1429  
Check Essential's Avatar
Works Every Weekend
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,506
Likes: 0
From: 737 ATL
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg
If we reduce profit sharing it is game over. C2015 will be a repeat of C2012 and completely cost neutral. If we can hold the line and keep profit sharing, we cannot fail.

The most important part of your survey is to protect profit sharing and move it off the table.

Jerry
Originally Posted by gzsg
Stock, stock options. No thank you.
Those two positions seem somewhat inconsistent.

Profit sharing and stock options are both forms of compensation that is "at risk" based on the company's performance.
Why is profit sharing so good but stock options are bad?
Reply
Old 09-04-2014 | 07:55 AM
  #1430  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 922
Likes: 0
From: Decoupled
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
I have those same worthless stock options you are talking about. I remember them touting the Black Scholes model and how DAL stock was on the way up, yada yada yada... but we now know that the B/S (interesting contraction I see now that I write it) was flawed. But..... and I am not necessarily advocating it... if we got options placed into a trading account that were immediately tradeable, I'd jump on that in a heartbeat.
If that happened, DALPA would hold back the stock, hire someone to try to sell the stock as a block, wait for the price to go to a historic low before releasing the stock.... Nah, that would never happen.

Let's just stay away from stock. Put it in my paycheck every month, month in, month out. Let Dick and Eddie play that game.

(I thought the B/S was a pretty good descriptor, too)
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kilroy
ExpressJet
10796
01-11-2016 06:49 AM
FastDEW
Major
201
09-03-2011 06:42 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
INAV8OR
Mergers and Acquisitions
66
05-15-2008 04:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices