Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Mergers and Acquisitions
DAL & NWA Pilots To Take Contract to Management on May 29th >

DAL & NWA Pilots To Take Contract to Management on May 29th

Search
Notices
Mergers and Acquisitions Facts, rumors, and conjecture

DAL & NWA Pilots To Take Contract to Management on May 29th

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-30-2008, 06:33 AM
  #31  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
Parking the DC-9's is not rumor. NWA's premerger fleet plan for 08 had them being reduced from over 100 aircraft to 68. Just a few years ago there were 160 DC-9's. Recent changes bring that number down to around 60 at the end of the year. That is a loss of over 40 aircraft this year. I don't think you could phase them out any faster if you wanted to.
Until they are in bubble wrap, yes, it is a "rumor". "If it ain't painted and sitting on the ramp, it's a rumor." Why don't we deal in tangible fact on this forum for a change?
tsquare is offline  
Old 05-30-2008, 06:34 AM
  #32  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by Check 6 View Post
Don't leave us hanging...what did he say??? Was it confirmed by the crew bus driver?
No.. .but the bus driver's mechanic said.....
tsquare is offline  
Old 05-30-2008, 06:40 AM
  #33  
Underboob King
 
Superpilot92's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Guppy Commander
Posts: 4,412
Wink

Originally Posted by Superpilot92 View Post
thats funny i just heard a rumor from a FAA MX inspector that DAL was parking all their 22 year old 767s. Heard that on the NWA FA board, Again its just a rumor....
It was sarcasm on my part reread what i wrote(above post ^^^^), not to mention the "". I was doing just as you suggest, i was calling out his "rumor".

Originally Posted by tsquare View Post
Super, and dtfl... why do guys continually post those kind of crap rumors? My wife's podiatrist's secretary's boyfriend said... I mean come on guys... give it a rest.
Superpilot92 is offline  
Old 05-30-2008, 06:41 AM
  #34  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 11,989
Default

OK, then lets comment on confirmed facts.

Delta's remaining 767 fleet is no where near 22 years old. I think some may have come as late as 2001 to 03. These airplanes are getting winglet mods, they already have new FMC's and Delta is spending a Billion on new seats, inflight entertainment and other upgrades.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 05-30-2008, 06:47 AM
  #35  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 11,989
Default

IMHO -

Mesa's injunction gives a strong indication of the merits of their case.

Injunctions are hard to get because the Court is acting BEFORE the trial. If the Court is willing to stop action preemptively that is a very strong indication that it believes that position will prevail.

I'm not sure if the Contracts with Mesa and Republic are bankruptcy proof, but I'm thinking the bankruptcy tool might get pulled out of the tool box again (for a variety of reasons) but mostly to deal with around 4 to 5 billion dollars worth of DCI contracts. The tail is wagging the dog.

IMHO this puts pressure on Comair (the RJ's that can be parked) and DC9's (the other, other, RJ's that can be parked).
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 05-30-2008, 07:17 AM
  #36  
Underboob King
 
Superpilot92's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Guppy Commander
Posts: 4,412
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar View Post
IMHO this puts pressure on Comair (the RJ's that can be parked) and DC9's (the other, other, RJ's that can be parked).

Is that how yall felt about your "RJ" 737-200/300's? The DC9s will be DAL aircraft soon and until we realize that its not ok to just park those and allow mgmt to get around our scope language the downward slide in our industry will continue. You seem to forget we have scope language to protect our -9s or the jobs they include. IF they are ALL parked its because DALs scope allowed it not NWA. The DC9 has a specific mission and it does a good job in it. The 34ish -50s will be sticking around for a while and i am sure the -40s will also. The -30s are a toss up, they are the 100 seaters that DAL says they need. I think they will be around until replacements can be found. we shall see. Either way there is going to be a big shuffle in aircraft and bases. We are on the same team so there is no reason to fight between groups.
Superpilot92 is offline  
Old 05-30-2008, 07:50 AM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
finis72's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: 777 Sim Instructor
Posts: 745
Default

The sooner we realize that we are on the same team the better off the "team" will be.Both groups have smart guys trying to get the best deal possible for their respective pilots. Let's hope they can compromise so we can be mad at them instead of some hooyah arbitrator. I,like everybody,don't want to lose seniority but I do want to play on a stronger team,I will have to compromise.Yes I am senior and I won't get too hurt regardless but I still want to fly to TLV.We all have issues.
finis72 is offline  
Old 05-30-2008, 08:02 AM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar View Post
IMHO -

Mesa's injunction gives a strong indication of the merits of their case.

Injunctions are hard to get because the Court is acting BEFORE the trial. If the Court is willing to stop action preemptively that is a very strong indication that it believes that position will prevail.

I'm not sure if the Contracts with Mesa and Republic are bankruptcy proof, but I'm thinking the bankruptcy tool might get pulled out of the tool box again (for a variety of reasons) but mostly to deal with around 4 to 5 billion dollars worth of DCI contracts. The tail is wagging the dog.

IMHO this puts pressure on Comair (the RJ's that can be parked) and DC9's (the other, other, RJ's that can be parked).

The court did not rule on the merits of the case which is the basis for Delta's appeal. The accepted the Mesa arguement that without an injunction Mesa would go out of business and therefore a trial would have no meaning or not happen at all. Delta feels it should be decided on the merits of the case.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 05-30-2008, 08:04 AM
  #39  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by Superpilot92 View Post
You seem to forget we have scope language to protect our -9s or the jobs they include. IF they are ALL parked its because DALs scope allowed it not NWA. The DC9 has a specific mission and it does a good job in it. The 34ish -50s will be sticking around for a while and i am sure the -40s will also. The -30s are a toss up, they are the 100 seaters that DAL says they need. I think they will be around until replacements can be found. we shall see. Either way there is going to be a big shuffle in aircraft and bases. We are on the same team so there is no reason to fight between groups.
I agree with ya Super.. Hopefully the committees that are hashing out the joint contract are cherry picking the best parts of both contracts. I demand nothing less, as I am I sure do you. Not badmouthing the -9, but in a parallel universe where airlines can make some money, I would THINK the companies would be looking for a more fuel efficient follow-on. (as I would expect them to do with ALL assets) But then again, like the US congress, when they have cash flow, they never seem to be able to look toward the bad times... I'm glad I don't run my checkbook like that.

Ciao!
tsquare is offline  
Old 05-30-2008, 08:06 AM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 757/767
Posts: 890
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post
The key is flexibility. They can park them or they can fly them. If they park them, they save money. If they fly them their total cost of operation is about the same as other 100 seat airplanes that have to be leased. If you don't understand that, I can't help you.

Carl
You keep making his point. The "flexibility" of which you speak means they're easier and therefore more likely to get parked. If you don't understand that then I can't help you either.

That being said, I spoke with one of the higher ups (name changed to protect the innocent) the other day and he candidly said that while the 30's were to go by by in short order the 50's would very likely have a future as a stop gap measure in the 100 seat market as a gap exists and
they don't like any of the new product available in that seat range. (ERJ and such) He went on to say that in this environment any fleet plan would not only need a date stamp but a time stamp to be reliable, as it may change two or three times in any given day.
Deez340 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Adlerdriver
Cargo
39
03-11-2008 07:09 AM
freightguy
Major
39
12-13-2007 11:59 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
02-06-2006 11:43 AM
nw320driver
Major
1
11-16-2005 01:23 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
04-29-2005 07:26 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices