United CPP comes to Mesa
10-21-2018 | 04:45 PM
#312
Banned
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 2,275
Likes: 0
I wouldn't worry about it, just do what you have to do, to move on up.
10-21-2018 | 06:25 PM
#313
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,601
Likes: 0
From: CRJ FO
I still think Mesa will end up being bought by someone...
10-21-2018 | 06:56 PM
#314
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
10-22-2018 | 05:48 AM
#316
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 4,083
Likes: 0
From: CRJ9 CA
10-22-2018 | 08:47 PM
#318
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
Until people start following the checklist and callouts, we will never get out of the demonstration phase. The FAA isn’t going to let us just keep using the 1600RVR. I’m surprised they’ve given us this long when the average is 6 months to remove the 1600 limitation.
10-23-2018 | 01:58 AM
#319
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
Until people start following the checklist and callouts, we will never get out of the demonstration phase. The FAA isn’t going to let us just keep using the 1600RVR. I’m surprised they’ve given us this long when the average is 6 months to remove the 1600 limitation.
Our latest attempt to fix the problem is just a bandaid. The FAA is simply letting us adjust our program. And, you are right, a properly designed CAT II procedure would be passed by the FAA in 6 months. And, the demonstration phase buys you 200 feet of visibility over CAT I. The FAA is pretty safe in letting us stay in the demonstration phase forever.
It won’t surprise me we lose all or part of the first 30 Ejets over it. I have already diverted over the difference between 1400 and 1600.
Last edited by calmwinds; 10-23-2018 at 02:19 AM.
10-23-2018 | 06:43 AM
#320
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
If it were that simple..... our callouts suck. Designed by someone who doesn’t fly the line. Try doing those callouts on a busy day and still effectively work the radio. Too much ******ing chatter in the callouts.
Our latest attempt to fix the problem is just a bandaid. The FAA is simply letting us adjust our program. And, you are right, a properly designed CAT II procedure would be passed by the FAA in 6 months. And, the demonstration phase buys you 200 feet of visibility over CAT I. The FAA is pretty safe in letting us stay in the demonstration phase forever.
It won’t surprise me we lose all or part of the first 30 Ejets over it. I have already diverted over the difference between 1400 and 1600.
Our latest attempt to fix the problem is just a bandaid. The FAA is simply letting us adjust our program. And, you are right, a properly designed CAT II procedure would be passed by the FAA in 6 months. And, the demonstration phase buys you 200 feet of visibility over CAT I. The FAA is pretty safe in letting us stay in the demonstration phase forever.
It won’t surprise me we lose all or part of the first 30 Ejets over it. I have already diverted over the difference between 1400 and 1600.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
