Search
Notices
Mesa Airlines Regional Airline

Dear Union Leadership.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-08-2020, 07:34 PM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2018
Posts: 446
Default

Originally Posted by NovemberBravo View Post
Compare our pay rates to everyone else’s why do we need to be further below every other airline. JO needs to use the money he was trying to spend on another airline.
We’re on a contract. All of those rates that you’re seeing are from the last two years. Remember, joe flaco was the highest paid quarterback for a period. . .
kevin18 is offline  
Old 06-09-2020, 08:09 AM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pangolin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Position: CRJ9 CA
Posts: 4,083
Default

Originally Posted by pangolin View Post
It’s not straight forward because of relative base seniority but my rough math puts it at about 640 seniority number as the bottom ca with a 20 pct shrink. We lose more ejet than crj captains because ejet is more Jr. May force some ca displacement to the ejet side. It’s a mess no matter what and this number is sheer fantasy. We know nothing. The public stance is stated in the investor call. JO would rather have a reduced hour MOU than to furlough.
It looks like seniority number 700 and below would reduce us by 98 captains. 47 from IAH, 36 from DFW, 2 from IAD and 13 from SDF. Likely would cause base closing at SDF or jr assignments to that base. Possibly some reassignment to IAH for CRJ guys but that would be expensive for the company. I don't know if downgrades have to work globally or if they can do it by base. The contract 23-J-4 does mention out of seniority downgrades. 16-A says the seniority list is primary unless otherwise noted. 23-D-4 covers voluntary displacements - hence why you have a voluntary option in your standing bid. You can bid to be voluntarily displaced to FO. After the voluntary displacements - then the displacements occur in reverse seniority order. So if a displacement bid is announced your standing bid is paramount. This is all premature but a good research exercise. We have no idea about furloughs or displacements and the "rumor" of 100 CA displacements is just that - an unsubstantiated rumor.
pangolin is offline  
Old 06-09-2020, 08:31 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2019
Posts: 486
Default

Originally Posted by pangolin View Post
It looks like seniority number 700 and below would reduce us by 98 captains. 47 from IAH, 36 from DFW, 2 from IAD and 13 from SDF. Likely would cause base closing at SDF or jr assignments to that base. Possibly some reassignment to IAH for CRJ guys but that would be expensive for the company. I don't know if downgrades have to work globally or if they can do it by base. The contract 23-J-4 does mention out of seniority downgrades. 16-A says the seniority list is primary unless otherwise noted. 23-D-4 covers voluntary displacements - hence why you have a voluntary option in your standing bid. You can bid to be voluntarily displaced to FO. After the voluntary displacements - then the displacements occur in reverse seniority order. So if a displacement bid is announced your standing bid is paramount. This is all premature but a good research exercise. We have no idea about furloughs or displacements and the "rumor" of 100 CA displacements is just that - an unsubstantiated rumor.
Few hours and everyone will know.
propellere is offline  
Old 06-09-2020, 11:13 AM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pangolin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Position: CRJ9 CA
Posts: 4,083
Default

Originally Posted by propellere View Post
Few hours and everyone will know.
I doubt it. I don't think this is any sort of staffing announcement.
pangolin is offline  
Old 06-09-2020, 04:31 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 504
Default

Originally Posted by pangolin View Post
I doubt it. I don't think this is any sort of staffing announcement.
Yep, he never mentioned anything about downgrades. I'm sure someone asked that question, but it got simply ignored.
mjpilot is offline  
Old 06-10-2020, 07:33 AM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pangolin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Position: CRJ9 CA
Posts: 4,083
Default

Originally Posted by mjpilot View Post
Yep, he never mentioned anything about downgrades. I'm sure someone asked that question, but it got simply ignored.
He did mention a staffing “problem” if demand doesn’t pick up. Downgrades could save payroll money without furloughs.

550 news was encouraging but seems to indicate GoJet is done. We could have an ORD or EWR base eventually.

I guess in a post covid world the drink/snack station is a non starter in the 550. So there’s the 550 lite. At any rate that was the brightest spot for pilots.

Not that we will be asked but I’m a hard no on a reduced credit MOU if downgrades are on the table.
pangolin is offline  
Old 06-10-2020, 08:10 AM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2019
Posts: 121
Default

Sorry, I know this is a dumb question and relates to scope etc but: why would United, after I thought Kirby recently indicated they wanted to get away from the 50-seaters, want to retrofit the 700’s to a 50 seat config? Why not just continue to operate as configured?
normalperson is offline  
Old 06-10-2020, 08:30 AM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 504
Default

Originally Posted by pangolin View Post
He did mention a staffing “problem” if demand doesn’t pick up. Downgrades could save payroll money without furloughs.

550 news was encouraging but seems to indicate GoJet is done. We could have an ORD or EWR base eventually.

I guess in a post covid world the drink/snack station is a non starter in the 550. So there’s the 550 lite. At any rate that was the brightest spot for pilots.

Not that we will be asked but I’m a hard no on a reduced credit MOU if downgrades are on the table.
Downgrades would save money as soon as the downgrades happen, which would be before October.

That's why Express Jet, Air Wisconsin, and others have started downgrade bids.

Clearly, we ARE highly overstaffed on both fleet types.

For me, listening to this call was just a waste of time, since I basically knew most of that information already by observing the whole industry.
mjpilot is offline  
Old 06-10-2020, 09:06 AM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 921
Default

Originally Posted by mjpilot View Post
Downgrades would save money as soon as the downgrades happen, which would be before October.

That's why Express Jet, Air Wisconsin, and others have started downgrade bids.

Clearly, we ARE highly overstaffed on both fleet types.

For me, listening to this call was just a waste of time, since I basically knew most of that information already by observing the whole industry.
Don’t believe downgrades before October would comply with the CARES act. Specifically the “no changes in pay rate” part. That is beyond a shadow of a doubt a change in pay rate. Unless of course the federal government chooses not to hold large companies accountable yet again.
terks43 is offline  
Old 06-10-2020, 09:22 AM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Swakid8's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 2,427
Default

Originally Posted by terks43 View Post
Don’t believe downgrades before October would comply with the CARES act. Specifically the “no changes in pay rate” part. That is beyond a shadow of a doubt a change in pay rate. Unless of course the federal government chooses not to hold large companies accountable yet again.
Cares Act doesn’t protect from Downgrades, it only protects the per hour rates and from layoffs.
Swakid8 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
APC225
United
1
02-23-2019 05:16 AM
YXnot
Major
1077
02-18-2011 09:17 PM
BoilerUP
Regional
121
12-25-2009 11:44 AM
iahflyr
Regional
44
01-17-2008 10:58 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices