Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Mesa Airlines
Mesa Terminates Pilot Training Program (FMN) >

Mesa Terminates Pilot Training Program (FMN)

Search
Notices
Mesa Airlines Regional Airline

Mesa Terminates Pilot Training Program (FMN)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-15-2009, 08:55 AM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Cycle Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: DAL Pilot
Posts: 1,133
Default

Originally Posted by Hot Rod Wannabe View Post
Maybe you can point out the difference between military 300 hour pilots and civilian 300 hour pilots. Again, hours don't make the pilot it is the program obviously. So your bitter whole 300 hour statement is for the birds. OE also depends on the check pilot, and of the 3 or 4 check airmen that I had, two were so bitter that I didn't have over 1000 hours "fixed wing" time that they would barely talk to me. They didn't care about the airline or who was in the right seat. They only cared about their agenda and were bitter against anyone who didn't suffer the way they did in getting to Captain Caveman status. IP's like this are a festuring wound on aviation and should not be allowed to teach anyone!
You're comparing a 300 hour military pilot to a 300 hour civilian pilot? What are you smoking? I don't even know how to respond to that statement! And sure, blame the checkairman... I'm sure it was their fault the guys didn't make it through training.

Did you ever look up the Valujet crash?
Cycle Pilot is offline  
Old 12-15-2009, 09:34 AM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 191
Default

Originally Posted by Cycle Pilot View Post
You're comparing a 300 hour military pilot to a 300 hour civilian pilot? What are you smoking? I don't even know how to respond to that statement! And sure, blame the checkairman... I'm sure it was their fault the guys didn't make it through training.

Did you ever look up the Valujet crash?
He is talking about military training vs. 300 hour airline pilot training programs, which train you like the airline would, like Mesa Pilot Development does. I will say this too, Of the people that graduated MAPD and went to ground school at Mesa, more people failed out of the sim and ground school that were flight instructors than MAPD grads (300 hour wonders), that is fact.

I think training programs like MAPD are good programs, and are not bad for the industry. They just need to maintain there ability to be strict on applicants and not just let anybody in, which there was a time where they didn't. The problem is with schools like ATP, where in 6 months you get all your ratings, we all know that you cant comprehend what your learning for all your ratings in 6 months. MAPD was a 2 year program, and you ate, drank, slept aviation, and you had to know your crap. Not only that you weren't just given the job, your performance in the program reflected on your interview.
TheBills is offline  
Old 12-15-2009, 09:39 AM
  #63  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,293
Default

Originally Posted by TheBills View Post
He is talking about military training vs. 300 hour airline pilot training programs, which train you like the airline would, like Mesa Pilot Development does. I will say this too, Of the people that graduated MAPD and went to ground school at Mesa, more people failed out of the sim and ground school that were flight instructors than MAPD grads (300 hour wonders), that is fact.
That would be expected, since the MAPD grads had been studying the airplane systems for two years and had significant sim time. That is not the best measure of pilot quality.

Mesa only cared about getting folks through training...meat-in-the-seat. Whether they had any experience, judgement, or command ability once they got on line was not really a concern.

Some MAPD grads had ZERO logged time in actual IMC when they started flying the line. The only Wx down in FMN was CB's...
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 12-15-2009, 11:16 AM
  #64  
Line Holder
 
Hot Rod Wannabe's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Banker....UGH!
Posts: 75
Default Cali Colombia ring any bells

Originally Posted by Cycle Pilot View Post
You're comparing a 300 hour military pilot to a 300 hour civilian pilot? What are you smoking? I don't even know how to respond to that statement! And sure, blame the checkairman... I'm sure it was their fault the guys didn't make it through training.

Did you ever look up the Valujet crash?
Your hourly argument is oscar meyer buddy. Did the pilots in Tenery(sp) Island have more or less than 1000 hours? How about the Pinacle accidents? How about Cali Colombia? Hours do make more experience, but hours alone don't make you a safe pilot! When I graduated basic rotary wing at mother rucker, I didn't have 300 hours and was a commercial rotary wing pilot. Military does the same thing and you need to know what you are taking about when it comes to the MAPD program. Whoever said they had significant sim hours was not telling the truth, FTD CRJ time at MAPD might be twenty hours and it is only a FTD and not a Class D. So stick to what you know.... pull out the USAToday and get reading.....
Hot Rod Wannabe is offline  
Old 12-15-2009, 11:39 AM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NoStep's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Position: Missionary
Posts: 309
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44 View Post
You should try flying a DC-9 sometime at NWA/Delta. It's night and day compared to regional jet flying.
I bet! Same airports, same weather, twice as many legs per day, no auto-throttles/auto-brakes/leading-edge lift, and vastly different pay.
NoStep is offline  
Old 12-15-2009, 11:42 AM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NoStep's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Position: Missionary
Posts: 309
Default

Originally Posted by detpilot View Post
None, and we don't know...

It's not just about the number of hours- it's about experience, confidence (standing up to another pilot for what you know is right), and think-outside-the-box ability. And you don't have to be a 121 pilot to understand that, hell even congress gets it.
...and you don't have to have an ATP for that, either!
NoStep is offline  
Old 12-15-2009, 11:54 AM
  #67  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,293
Default

Originally Posted by Hot Rod Wannabe View Post
Y Whoever said they had significant sim hours was not telling the truth, FTD CRJ time at MAPD might be twenty hours and it is only a FTD and not a Class D.
That was me. Yes, it is an FTD not full-motion but I was explaining why they have a good pass rate during mesa new-hire training...they know where all the buttons are and they know how the glass works. 20 hours is plenty significant for familiarization purposes.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 12-15-2009, 12:07 PM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
captjns's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 5,912
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44 View Post
You should try flying a DC-9 sometime at NWA/Delta. It's night and day compared to regional jet flying.
Why... is flying a DC-9 for NWA/Delta any different than flying a DC-9 for any other carrier, or another airplane without auththrottle, GPS, non-RVSM equipped...

Help me out here... do you feel that flying a DC-9 endows one with special skill? Are they a cut above the rest of the pilots?
captjns is offline  
Old 12-15-2009, 12:20 PM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 191
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
That would be expected, since the MAPD grads had been studying the airplane systems for two years and had significant sim time. That is not the best measure of pilot quality.

Mesa only cared about getting folks through training...meat-in-the-seat. Whether they had any experience, judgement, or command ability once they got on line was not really a concern.

Some MAPD grads had ZERO logged time in actual IMC when they started flying the line. The only Wx down in FMN was CB's...
Is being able to enter a hold, being able to recite call outs at appropriate times, knowing emergency action items a measure of pilot quality. Items that I just stated were of many reasons that pilots at MAPD and pilots off the street failed out of the sim, more so off the street believe it or not. My only argument here is that just cause you are an instructor means you have different experience, it does not mean that you are more qualified than someone who devotes 2 years of their life to really learning to fly an airplane under the 121 environment. I also dont think that I am an amazing pilot cause I went through that program, even though im sure it may sound that way. Airlines that hired 300 hour FBO pilots is a completely different story, that was/is a problem.
TheBills is offline  
Old 12-15-2009, 01:07 PM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Cycle Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: DAL Pilot
Posts: 1,133
Default

Originally Posted by Hot Rod Wannabe View Post
Your hourly argument is oscar meyer buddy. Did the pilots in Tenery(sp) Island have more or less than 1000 hours? How about the Pinacle accidents? How about Cali Colombia? Hours do make more experience, but hours alone don't make you a safe pilot!
Oscar Meyer? What the heck does that mean? Of course, pilots with more than 1000 hours are going to get into accidents, too. We're talking about accident rates here. Bringing up the Pinnacle accident is not helping your argument. Those pilots stalled an RJ at 41000 feet which flamed out both engines... again... basic flying 101 skills. Not to mention, they were acting completely unprofessional during the flight. Switching seats and pulling up quickly after takeoff to mention a couple. Have you read the NTSB report on that accident? The F.O. was new and in the right seat of an RJ while the airplane stalled. Not once did he speak up.

You are right, though, in one point. Hours alone does not make you a safe pilot. It's about quality hours and I believe that going through a "puppy pilot mill" is not building quality hours. You're missing that foundation you get while flight instructing and flying single pilot IFR. Somebody mentioned above, that guys coming out of your FMN school had zero IMC. That's just scary!
Cycle Pilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
USMC3197
Regional
66
11-12-2009 06:54 PM
ebuhoner
Flight Schools and Training
35
10-10-2009 09:02 AM
Longbow64
Part 135
117
07-23-2009 08:46 AM
dashtrash300
Regional
12
05-11-2009 06:07 AM
AirbornPegasus
Regional
14
04-08-2009 07:17 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices