Search
Notices
Mesa Airlines Regional Airline

Mesa

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-27-2014, 07:41 AM
  #3661  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Position: CRJ
Posts: 273
Default Mesa

Apples-oranges. Mesa is in contract negotiations and has been for years.

Consider this. Let's talk about recent events. CPZ got gains in their contract. Expressjet AND Envoy turned down contracts as of late. The ball was in PSA's court. Pilots are finally back in the drivers seat when it comes to negotiations. PSA didn't turn down the offer. I think that's the biggest problem/issue everybody has. Does this sound about right or am I off base?
squall line is offline  
Old 10-27-2014, 07:54 AM
  #3662  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Left
Posts: 1,809
Default

Originally Posted by squall line View Post
Apples-oranges. Mesa is in contract negotiations and has been for years.

Consider this. Let's talk about recent events. CPZ got gains in their contract. Expressjet AND Envoy turned down contracts as of late. The ball was in PSA's court. Pilots are finally back in the drivers seat when it comes to negotiations. PSA didn't turn down the offer. I think that's the biggest problem/issue everybody has. Does this sound about right or am I off base?
Pretty much correct.

Unfortunately a wholly owned carrier is in a very different position from a stand alone regional carrier when it comes to negotiating. Comparing XJT, CPZ, and RAH votes to a PSA vote is well, to steal your term, apples to oranges.

Eagle's situation definitely more closely mirrors PSA's but they are also significantly larger, giving them more leverage with a no vote.

Everyone wanted PSA to vote no because "they can't shut you down, no one can staff your flying."

PSA had 49 acft at the time of our vote. We were told by "the industry" that there's no way AAG could shut us down anytime soon due to the pilot shortage. AAG is transferring 47 acft from Eagle to PSA in a little over a years time.

They absolutely could've shut us down, and would have.

The guys that voted yes mostly for our LOA were guys that have been around for years and had seen what Parker is, and how he operates. They decided he wasn't bluffing. It seems they were right.
pagey is offline  
Old 10-27-2014, 08:10 AM
  #3663  
Gets Weekends Off
 
24/48's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 455
Default

Originally Posted by Crazy Canuck View Post
LOL ***? No offense to Mesa pilots, but Mesa is on a WAY lower scale than PSA. PSA pilots may have an ugly cap on their pay scale, which I am not defending, but Mesa's pay scale is WAY worse than PSA.

I shake my head everytime I hear people at Mesa accuse PSA pilots of being "scabs." If you took a job with a low pay scale for a quick upgrade, you have done the same exact thing. Go ahead and point the finger, because not only are you in the same boat as "those PSA scabs," but you're no better than the passengers who fly and pretend to fall and be injured on the jet bridge and sue for millions of dollars. It's only okay when you do it....
First off, one is only a scab if they cross a picket line or if one flies struck work. Secondly, if we're talking about scab like behavior, then those who live in glass houses (Skywest pilots) should not throw stones! When Skywest bought ASA back in '05 from DAL I remember CR7's being ferried up to SLC to hand over to Skywest because Skywest flew them for less. In fact, our MEC Chair at the time told Jerry that it was a smart business move and that the 50 seaters should be transferred to ASA because we flew them for a $1 or $2 less than the Skywest folks, yeah that didn't happen.

But hey, that's how Skywest pilots roll, they've always ridden the coat-tails of the unionized carriers. CMR & ACA had killer contracts before 9/11/01 and Jerry gave the Skywest pilots something comparable in pay and QOL. Skywest was the darling of DAL for a while after the CMR strike because Skywest wasn't a strike threat, and that my friend put everyone else at a disadvantage.

Fast forward to today.....I hear Skywest pilots are referring to themselves as "mainline". Mainline what? Because your non-union outfit sits on the sidelines watching management screw over the ASA/XJT pilots? When was the last time you "mainliners" flew your own code? The flying you do on behalf of UA, DL, and AA is not mainline flying.

So sit there and rail on Mesa and their contract, and improperly label them scabs. Just know that us true mainliners don't like non-union pilots who go around calling union members in good standing scabs.

Have a nice day!
24/48 is offline  
Old 10-27-2014, 08:49 AM
  #3664  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Bumbaclot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Position: Mannin' deez blenps
Posts: 193
Default

Originally Posted by Jrflight View Post
How senior is Dfw going? Are new hires getting it? What is upgràde time? Whats training like? Can someone guve me the run down. I'm thinking about a lateral move for a home base. Thanks.
So far June 2014 guys got DFW in the first round. So yes it will go mid-junior. In the next couple months you will see new hires start to get it. Number 3 in base seniority First Officer at DFW is a May 2013 hire. So far 21 lines and 33 FO's in base for Nov.

Upgrade time is probably around 2yrs for a new new hire. Training CRJ is done in mostly in PHX with good instructors and good training environment. Challenging but laid back where you'll do well at it. E175 is done primarily in STL at FSI.
Bumbaclot is offline  
Old 10-27-2014, 09:39 AM
  #3665  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Crazy Canuck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 1,154
Default

Originally Posted by prior121 View Post
We didn't take concessions to secure OTHER people's flying. End of story.

I love how everyone says we have the WORST contract in the industry when in reality our contract is better than Republic, lakes and GoJets. All while our MEC is constantly making headway with management for a new and better contract for MAG pilots.

I don't see anyone in the RAH forums giving those guys crap for going to RAH with such a horrible contract including no cancellation pay.
Neither did PSA. I could understand your argument if Eagle had voted "no" and PSA had subsequently voted "yes," but it happened in the reverse order. So the argument that PSA pilots are lowlife scumbag scabs really holds no water.

I DO, however, join you in feeling like the concessional vote helps to drag the industry down. However, I am a grown man and don't hold personal childish vendettas against those who were looking out for themselves.

Also, fair enough on your contract. I wasn't suggesting it was worst in the industry (which is a subjective thing).
Crazy Canuck is offline  
Old 10-27-2014, 09:42 AM
  #3666  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Crazy Canuck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 1,154
Default

Originally Posted by 24/48 View Post
First off, one is only a scab if they cross a picket line or if one flies struck work. Secondly, if we're talking about scab like behavior, then those who live in glass houses (Skywest pilots) should not throw stones! When Skywest bought ASA back in '05 from DAL I remember CR7's being ferried up to SLC to hand over to Skywest because Skywest flew them for less. In fact, our MEC Chair at the time told Jerry that it was a smart business move and that the 50 seaters should be transferred to ASA because we flew them for a $1 or $2 less than the Skywest folks, yeah that didn't happen.

But hey, that's how Skywest pilots roll, they've always ridden the coat-tails of the unionized carriers. CMR & ACA had killer contracts before 9/11/01 and Jerry gave the Skywest pilots something comparable in pay and QOL. Skywest was the darling of DAL for a while after the CMR strike because Skywest wasn't a strike threat, and that my friend put everyone else at a disadvantage.

Fast forward to today.....I hear Skywest pilots are referring to themselves as "mainline". Mainline what? Because your non-union outfit sits on the sidelines watching management screw over the ASA/XJT pilots? When was the last time you "mainliners" flew your own code? The flying you do on behalf of UA, DL, and AA is not mainline flying.

So sit there and rail on Mesa and their contract, and improperly label them scabs. Just know that us true mainliners don't like non-union pilots who go around calling union members in good standing scabs.

Have a nice day!

1st of all, lol @ those calling us "mainline." Never heard that and it's blatantly ridiculous. SKW and XJT are completely different companies.

2nd of all, you just argued that "scab like behaviour" is X, then proceeded to tell me how OO pilots were "scabs" for doing Y. Nice logic!

I'm proud of being non union. Unions have helped run airlines in America into the ground. But hey, that's just my opinion, and you can feel free to kiss ALPA's ass if you want!

3. You have a nice day too
Crazy Canuck is offline  
Old 10-27-2014, 09:52 AM
  #3667  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: doggy style
Posts: 1,006
Default

Originally Posted by Crazy Canuck View Post
Neither did PSA. I could understand your argument if Eagle had voted "no" and PSA had subsequently voted "yes," but it happened in the reverse order. So the argument that PSA pilots are lowlife scumbag scabs really holds no water.
What timeline are you looking at?

Jul 2013 - Eagle votes to reject to "b" scale contract. AA immediately approaches PSA for concessions for a guarantee of 30 large aircraft.

Sept 2013 - PSA scum say yes.

March 2014 - Eagle once again approached for concessions for large aircraft. Pressure is higher now that PSA scum have p***ed on Eagle. (See the whipsaw?) Eagle tells AA to GFY.
DENpilot is offline  
Old 10-27-2014, 10:07 AM
  #3668  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,100
Default

Originally Posted by DENpilot View Post
What timeline are you looking at?

Jul 2013 - Eagle votes to reject to "b" scale contract. AA immediately approaches PSA for concessions for a guarantee of 30 large aircraft.

Sept 2013 - PSA scum say yes.

March 2014 - Eagle once again approached for concessions for large aircraft. Pressure is higher now that PSA scum have p***ed on Eagle. (See the whipsaw?) Eagle tells AA to GFY.
May 2015 - AAG management announces the transfer of the remaining Envoy aircraft to Piedmont and Eagle will be wound down.

Envoy has a great group of guys but IMO they got cocky and forgot their place.
Name User is offline  
Old 10-27-2014, 12:43 PM
  #3669  
Gets Weekends Off
 
24/48's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 455
Default

Originally Posted by FaceBiter View Post
You seem to have an odd facination with Mesa and its hiring process for a "true mainliner".
Think what you want my friend....
24/48 is offline  
Old 10-27-2014, 12:43 PM
  #3670  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FerrisBluer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Position: Bob's Big Boy Front Office Staffer
Posts: 263
Default

Originally Posted by Crazy Canuck View Post
1st of all, lol @ those calling us "mainline." Never heard that and it's blatantly ridiculous. SKW and XJT are completely different companies.

2nd of all, you just argued that "scab like behaviour" is X, then proceeded to tell me how OO pilots were "scabs" for doing Y. Nice logic!

I'm proud of being non union. Unions have helped run airlines in America into the ground. But hey, that's just my opinion, and you can feel free to kiss ALPA's ass if you want!

3. You have a nice day too
FerrisBluer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nwa757
Regional
31
07-31-2018 04:58 PM
AirbornPegasus
Regional
14
04-08-2009 07:17 PM
Spanky189
Regional
10
05-16-2008 09:38 AM
familyguy
Regional
49
04-11-2008 12:03 AM
LOW FUEL
Regional
104
08-17-2007 04:41 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices