Search

Notices
Mesa Airlines Regional Airline

Mesa

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-28-2014 | 10:49 PM
  #4291  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 977
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by flyingmau5
What's a decent upgrade to you? If under 1 year, look somewhere else. If under 2, still look somewhere else. If you go in now, you'll be looking at a minimum of 2.5 years if we don't get more planes than what we're getting already.
I'm thinking 3-5 years upgrade time for the most junior folks flying the line right now, and 5+ years for anyone just now starting class.
Old 11-28-2014 | 10:56 PM
  #4292  
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,006
Likes: 0
From: doggy style
Default

Originally Posted by flapshalfspeed
I'm thinking 3-5 years upgrade time for the most junior folks flying the line right now, and 5+ years for anyone just now starting class.
Way off. How do you figure?

Even with a modest 8/mo attrition, upgrade for a new hire assuming every single pilot ahead of him took the upgrade, would be 2.5 years based on attrition alone. Factor in another 50-60 ejet upgrades for growth and you are looking at 2 years or less for a new hire now.

Factor in that 3/4 pilots hired in the last year were from a CFI background and most will not hit 1000 hours 121 SIC until about a year and a half into their career, 2 years can easily be 1.5 years.
Old 11-28-2014 | 11:06 PM
  #4293  
flyingmau5's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
From: NB CA
Default

Originally Posted by flapshalfspeed
I'm thinking 3-5 years upgrade time for the most junior folks flying the line right now, and 5+ years for anyone just now starting class.
You are not thinking...
Old 11-28-2014 | 11:23 PM
  #4294  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,035
Likes: 0
Wink

Originally Posted by prior121
Cool story brah...

Newsflash: all the regionals suck, JO isn't the only CEO who wishes he could replace FOs with monkeys.

We are contract employees to the majors and the cheapest bidder gets the flying. Hmm I bet a monkey would be cheaper than me. I think YOU and a lot of people forget that.

Look what happened to Comair, look what's happening to Eagle. I commend them for standing up for the industry but we aren't mainline pilots and we don't have the leverage (mainline) pilots have. If we get too expensive we're gone. Period.




Heck I wish we could put vending machines in the back and that FA pay could be tacked onto my pay. Just sayin'

Enjoy your failing 125 operation.






You keep repeating the same thing ad nauseam, but the truth is some regionals suck less than others. If people would quit flocking to the worst of them(and most know who those are), the worst offenders would be forced to raise their pay and benefits to continue to operate. This would also benefit the whole industry since management at the better regionals would no longer be able to point to the bottom feeders as an argument against being able to increase pay and benefits at the "better" regionals.
Maybe, just maybe, we could actually look forward to stopping the continual slide in pay and benefits. Professional pilots should not be able to qualify for food stamps!
Old 11-28-2014 | 11:37 PM
  #4295  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 0
From: ERJ CA
Default

Originally Posted by Paid2fly
You keep repeating the same thing ad nauseam, but the truth is some regionals suck less than others.
Perhaps, but that list changes continually and there is no regional that doesn't suck at all.
Old 11-29-2014 | 01:36 AM
  #4296  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,035
Likes: 0
Wink

Originally Posted by Blackwing
Perhaps, but that list changes continually and there is no regional that doesn't suck at all.






The "list" has been pretty consistent for quite some time(J.O.'s baby has always been on it)!
Old 11-29-2014 | 06:20 AM
  #4297  
prior121's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,539
Likes: 0
From: 175 Left
Default

Originally Posted by Paid2fly
Quote:

You keep repeating the same thing ad nauseam, but the truth is some regionals suck less than others. If people would quit flocking to the worst of them(and most know who those are), the worst offenders would be forced to raise their pay and benefits to continue to operate. This would also benefit the whole industry since management at the better regionals would no longer be able to point to the bottom feeders as an argument against being able to increase pay and benefits at the "better" regionals.
Maybe, just maybe, we could actually look forward to stopping the continual slide in pay and benefits. Professional pilots should not be able to qualify for food stamps!

Kick rocks bro...

We get it, you don't like Mesa. You don't work here and this place isn't the same place it was in 2008.

Go play in the XJT or the wherever you work forums.
Old 11-29-2014 | 06:42 AM
  #4298  
24/48's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by prior121
First off, the superlative of stupid, is most stupid. Not stupidest.

So this is "The most stupid post you've ever read."

Secondly, your trying to tell me it would be cheaper for mainline to take flying back?

A mainline crew has less labor costs than a regional crew for the same aircraft? Righhhht.


I personally know of three college students who are in ground school here right now fresh out of Purdue.

I know of another two who are freshman in an aviation program.

Carry on.
Believe it or not flying is coming back to the mainline, both DAL and UAL. The last few years the UAX operation has accounted for a large number of customer complaints. DAL has already parked a bunch of RJ's and replaced them with 717's. UAL is increasing block hours on the 319/320, and 737 fleets to replace UAX flying. UAL management is actively pursuing an aircraft to bridge the gap between the E175's and the 319/737, and no we will not be giving them any relief on that.

To your second point, pilot costs are a very small percentage of the CASM. These next 5 years will be very interesting for the regionals because there simply are not enough chairs when the music stops. Mesa is a step ahead of many.
Old 11-29-2014 | 06:45 AM
  #4299  
24/48's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by flapshalfspeed
I wish I knew who you were so I could call my friends & former co-workers at legacies/FDX/Emirates/etc. to make sure your horrible attitude never makes its way into one of their cockpits (I'm sure it won't anyways, given the 'tude you're expressing here at your first 121 job).
And with all these friends that have all this pull you're still at a regional?
Old 11-29-2014 | 08:04 AM
  #4300  
prior121's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,539
Likes: 0
From: 175 Left
Default

Originally Posted by 24/48


Believe it or not flying is coming back to the mainline, both DAL and UAL. The last few years the UAX operation has accounted for a large number of customer complaints. DAL has already parked a bunch of RJ's and replaced them with 717's. UAL is increasing block hours on the 319/320, and 737 fleets to replace UAX flying. UAL management is actively pursuing an aircraft to bridge the gap between the E175's and the 319/737, and no we will not be giving them any relief on that.

To your second point, pilot costs are a very small percentage of the CASM. These next 5 years will be very interesting for the regionals because there simply are not enough chairs when the music stops. Mesa is a step ahead of many.
We're talking about two separate things here.

You're talking about flying being taken back by mainline, which is being done.

I'm talking about regional flying being shifted from higher costing labor groups to cheaper ones.

Here's a few examples:

Comair flying to GoJet.

American Eagle flying to PSA.

Mesa being awarded new flying. (No denying we're dirt cheap, especially compared to wholly owned Regionals.)

TSA CRJ700s to GoJet for cheaper labor costs.

ETC.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nwa757
Regional
31
07-31-2018 04:58 PM
AirbornPegasus
Regional
14
04-08-2009 07:17 PM
Spanky189
Regional
10
05-16-2008 09:38 AM
familyguy
Regional
49
04-11-2008 12:03 AM
LOW FUEL
Regional
104
08-17-2007 04:41 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices