Search
Notices
Mesa Airlines Regional Airline

Mesa

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-09-2015, 11:18 AM
  #8321  
Chief Engineer
 
ScottyDo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Position: CRJ FO
Posts: 815
Default

One thing I have noticed this week which is an improvement is the use of A/C carts. From what I was told last month none of them worked before.
ScottyDo is offline  
Old 06-09-2015, 11:20 AM
  #8322  
sippin' dat koolaid
 
Joined APC: Jun 2013
Position: gear slinger
Posts: 982
Default

Originally Posted by PilotCrusader View Post
Yeah Envoy ground sucks!! They do better with us because thenpilots and MX carry them. The gate agents and rampers are trained in less than a day and shoved in front of an airplane/passengers with little to no help.
Our gate agent didn't want to face the pax during the delays, so she just came down to the A/C to hang with the crew and grab something to drink.
tinman1 is offline  
Old 06-09-2015, 11:42 AM
  #8323  
sippin' dat koolaid
 
Joined APC: Jun 2013
Position: gear slinger
Posts: 982
Default

Originally Posted by ScottyDo View Post
I would even be happy with just some acknowledgment from the company on these issues.
The company acknowledging problems doesn't do dick for us.
tinman1 is offline  
Old 06-09-2015, 11:46 AM
  #8324  
Chief Engineer
 
ScottyDo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Position: CRJ FO
Posts: 815
Default

Originally Posted by tinman1 View Post
Our gate agent didn't want to face the pax during the delays, so she just came down to the A/C to hang with the crew and grab something to drink.
I yelled at a gate agent for doing that once. The plane was down for MX the rest of the crew was already on the aircraft. I arrived late from another flight I was working. I stood at the gate for 20 minuets waiting to go down along with 20 passengers waiting for the gate agent as well. She finally came up after I called dispatch. I was not very nice.

As far as the company acknolgment goes, of course it's not enough, but it's a step in the right direction.
ScottyDo is offline  
Old 06-09-2015, 11:57 AM
  #8325  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2014
Position: Captain - Retired
Posts: 265
Default

Originally Posted by 24/48 View Post
RV is correct. Qualifications matter not, I would argue that once you've been on-line in the 121 world for about 6-12 months then you've got the qualifications to do the job whether it's a regional or a major. Majors just have the luxury to be selective whereas regionals don't. When UA began their big hiring boom we were seeing average hours for new hires north of 10,000, now it's probably 6,000-7,000 and dropping.

Additionally, you go from the left seat of an RJ to the right seat of a 737 or Airbus because that's what your new seniority can hold. Sure you went from the left seat back to the right seat but chances are you'll be making more in the right seat of major than the left seat of a regional. Starting pay at UA is $70/hr 1st year and jumps over $100/hr 2nd year. Not to mention the work rules, retirement, etc.

I will agree that it is backward, and I'm all for the flying done by regionals coming back to the mainline. In fact, it slowly is. The 319's at UA are moving in to cover what the 70-76 seaters are doing, and the 70-76 seaters are moving to cover the 50 seaters that are getting parked. Word is DAL's TA lowers the cap for DCI from 450 hulls to 425, and UA is next up at the plate so we'll hopefully drop to 425 or better.
Both of you seem to have missed my point entirely. I'm not talking about qualifications and minimum hiring experience...I didn't even mention it. I'm talking about how much experience is needed as a first officer before becoming a captain.

24/48...the way you responded to my statement it seems you are saying that it only takes 6-12 months of being a copilot before being qualified to be a captain regardless of previous experience!!? That's a bit insane.

I understand that modern jet airliners are designed to be idiot proof and don't require nearly as much skill to fly as the job used to require but 6-12 months?

My point is that a large jet is a large jet is a large jet when it comes to the level of skill and experience needed to fly it. Yes it's possible to take a low time pilot and make them a captain in a few years and it doesn't matter if it's a EMB-175 or a B-787...you can teach a reasonably capable pilot to fly just about any modern airliner...the size doesn't have much to do with it.

My point is to ask the question.... do you really want to?

Theoretically, an airline needs almost as many co pilots as captains to fill a schedule...not accounting for modest industry growth and fluctuations in the hiring and retirement ages of pilots, a typical airline will hire a first officer and that average first officer will spend almost the first half of their entire career as a co pilot, gaining valuable experience before the position of captain is available.

This is what seniority was designed for...this was how it was supposed to work and this is the way it used to work. The problem is that it doesn't work this way any more and we have a system of "regionals" which are in fact full scale large national airlines that cover schedules coast to coast flying large jets that used to be flown by the mainline. Commuter airlines don't really even exist anymore (there are a very few left and they're slowly dying).

The so called "regionals" are putting low time captains in the left seat with very little career experience....They are earning wages that aren't even as good in many cases as the first officers on mainline fleets.

Seniority is a tool perpetuated by the unions and used by big airline management to disrupt the natural flow of experience and put low paid and (mostly) low time pilots in the left seats of half the flights in the US while much higher time pilots (again generally speaking) often with many years experience as large jet captains will wallow in the right seat of Boeing and Airbus jets at higher (but still artificially low) pay.

It's a total waste of experience and an inefficient distribution of the available talent in the US. But...it saves millions of dollars in labor costs at the expense of pilots.
NineGturn is offline  
Old 06-09-2015, 12:20 PM
  #8326  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Posts: 71
Default

Originally Posted by NineGturn View Post
It's a total waste of experience and an inefficient distribution of the available talent in the US. But...it saves millions of dollars in labor costs at the expense of pilots.
Well said, sir.
LTdan is offline  
Old 06-09-2015, 12:31 PM
  #8327  
Living the Dream
 
deltajuliet's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,795
Default

I think 24/48 was saying after 6-12 months you have enough experience to adequately perform the duties of a First Officer at a regional or major, not to be a Captain.

I agree with everyone it would make more sense to go from CRJ FO to A320 FO, as opposed to CRJ FO to CRJ Captain to A320 FO. But we'd need flying back at mainline for that. As it stands, it's worked okay so far because upgrade times were usually a few years, now it's often as fast as you can get 1000 121 SIC. I still think an American pilot who upgraded at 1000 hours is safer than a lot of foreign 3rd/2nd world Captains, but we'll see if it creates any problems over the next year or two.
deltajuliet is offline  
Old 06-09-2015, 12:40 PM
  #8328  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Harpyr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 167
Default

Originally Posted by RB211 View Post
Mesa has no staffing issues with the pilots. Read between the lines.
This. Its primarily an issue with how often the aircraft can get rotated into MX, compounded by the rampers themselves. Staffing isn't the problem. Lack of spare aircraft is also a problem, but future deliveries will help, I think.
Harpyr is offline  
Old 06-09-2015, 12:53 PM
  #8329  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 555
Default

Originally Posted by ScottyDo View Post
acknolgment
Dude......
RV5M is offline  
Old 06-09-2015, 12:57 PM
  #8330  
Living the Dream
 
deltajuliet's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,795
Default

Originally Posted by Harpyr View Post
This. Its primarily an issue with how often the aircraft can get rotated into MX, compounded by the rampers themselves. Staffing isn't the problem. Lack of spare aircraft is also a problem, but future deliveries will help, I think.
Sounds like 407 could be put to better use in Dallas.
deltajuliet is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nwa757
Regional
31
07-31-2018 04:58 PM
AirbornPegasus
Regional
14
04-08-2009 07:17 PM
Spanky189
Regional
10
05-16-2008 09:38 AM
familyguy
Regional
49
04-11-2008 12:03 AM
LOW FUEL
Regional
104
08-17-2007 04:41 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices