Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Other
Great Lakes' Part 135 plan >

Great Lakes' Part 135 plan

Search
Notices
Other Regional Airlines

Great Lakes' Part 135 plan

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-02-2014, 10:31 AM
  #511  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,837
Default

Originally Posted by zondaracer View Post
Unfortunately, I know a handful of guys who aren't anywhere near 1500TT and don't want to instruct and view GL as their way to bypass the new ATP rule.
They won't be bypassing the ATP rule because they will still need their ATP before they ever set foot in a P121 cockpit. They are bridging that gap with time as a P135 FO rather than being a CFI right up to 1500 hrs - and probably coming out with a better idea of what it takes to operate in that industry too. This has become no different than a 300 CFI getting any other P135 job to build time.
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 04-02-2014, 10:53 AM
  #512  
Moderator
 
Cubdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: ATP, CFI etc.
Posts: 6,056
Default

That SEC filing just says they are going to be late with their SEC forms and it does not mean they are bankrupt. I find it interesting the same filing mentions their Part 135 ticket as an existing approval, which is the first solid evidence I have seen they actually got it.
Cubdriver is offline  
Old 04-02-2014, 11:02 AM
  #513  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sr. Barco's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2005
Posts: 495
Default

Originally Posted by Cubdriver View Post
That SEC filing just says they are going to be late with their SEC forms and it does not mean they are bankrupt. I find it interesting the same filing mentions their Part 135 ticket as an existing approval, which is the first solid evidence I have seen they actually got it.
Well this is a fairly powerful statement:

Until the Company is able to re-staff qualified pilots, in sufficient quantity, it is expected that the Company will not have sufficient forecasted liquidity to service our existing debt obligations which raises substantial doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Sr. Barco is offline  
Old 04-02-2014, 11:03 AM
  #514  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Apokleros's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Position: ERJ
Posts: 383
Default

Originally Posted by zondaracer View Post
Unfortunately, I know a handful of guys who aren't anywhere near 1500TT and don't want to instruct and view GL as their way to bypass the new ATP rule.
Sounds like me. I hate instructing, and am looking at Great Mistakes as a way to build time fast so that I can move on to a better regional. Am I crazy for considering this? I don't care what the pay is, it's what I'm making right now as a CFI anyway....
Apokleros is offline  
Old 04-02-2014, 11:10 AM
  #515  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: doggy style
Posts: 1,006
Default

Originally Posted by Apokleros View Post
I don't care what the pay is, it's what I'm making right now as a CFI anyway....
That's the problem with the regionals right now. Where does it end?

"Oh, I'll take that $16/hr regional job. I don't care what the pay is, I just want to build my time for that E170 job."

"Oh, I'll take that $22/hr regional job. I don't care what the pay is, I just want to build my time for that mainline 737 job."


We've all been guilty of it at one point, but going to GLA is the lowest of lows. That place deserves to go out of business for their sleazy treatment of pilots. There is no excuse paying an FO $16/hr or a capt $27/hr.
DENpilot is offline  
Old 04-02-2014, 11:19 AM
  #516  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sr. Barco's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2005
Posts: 495
Default

Originally Posted by Apokleros View Post
Sounds like me. I hate instructing, and am looking at Great Mistakes as a way to build time fast so that I can move on to a better regional. Am I crazy for considering this? I don't care what the pay is, it's what I'm making right now as a CFI anyway....
Given the current state of the industry, yes you are crazy.

Have some respect for yourself and the industry. By signing a training contract and working for absolute crap pay under abusive conditions you are devaluing your worth and condoning these working conditions. Also keep in mind companies like GLA have very high checkride failure rates and will hang you out to dry in any encounter with the FAA. It's a risky environment in which to fly.

Be patient and let a good job come to you.
Sr. Barco is offline  
Old 04-02-2014, 01:47 PM
  #517  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,941
Default

Do Captains have to take 2 checkrides (135 and 121) every 6 months? 2 training events, 2 orals, etc..
tom11011 is offline  
Old 04-02-2014, 04:48 PM
  #518  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 251
Default

Originally Posted by tom11011 View Post
Do Captains have to take 2 checkrides (135 and 121) every 6 months? 2 training events, 2 orals, etc..
No. The 2 operations are identical minus 10 seats in the back. Very simple actually.
EMB120IP is offline  
Old 04-02-2014, 06:35 PM
  #519  
Moderator
 
Cubdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: ATP, CFI etc.
Posts: 6,056
Default

Originally Posted by Sr. Barco View Post
Well this is a fairly powerful statement:

Until the Company is able to re-staff qualified pilots, in sufficient quantity, it is expected that the Company will not have sufficient forecasted liquidity to service our existing debt obligations which raises substantial doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Sounds pretty dire but they were apparently approved to hire 500-hour pilots like in the old days. Less passengers on some flights maybe but the bacon still gets bought flying half empty 1900s to podunk towns. If it were up to me this company would stop abusing pilots and possibly even go away, but it's not my call and the markets (plus FAA) allow it.
Cubdriver is offline  
Old 04-02-2014, 06:49 PM
  #520  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sr. Barco's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2005
Posts: 495
Default

Originally Posted by Cubdriver View Post
If it were up to me this company would stop abusing pilots and possibly even go away, but it's not my call and the markets (plus FAA) allow it.
I'm with you on that. They need to go away. The sooner flying is brought back to mainline carriers and/or regional airline pay doubles the better off we'll be.
Sr. Barco is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
wmuflyboy
Flight Schools and Training
30
03-26-2023 06:18 PM
skypilot35
Other
139
12-29-2015 03:51 PM
Pony Express
Part 135
11
05-06-2013 08:08 PM
Aero1900
Career Questions
22
12-03-2012 06:31 AM
FuelJetA
Part 135
11
03-12-2006 03:29 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices