Ameriflight
#5011
Line Holder
Joined APC: May 2019
Posts: 75
I'm wrapping up my ratings this fall and will be at about 1050 hours. I own my own plane, so i'll be working up quickly after that to 1200 and 135 mins. Thanks for all the informative posts here (and FreightDogs for the PM's and advice). Hoping to learn more about the potential DEC opportunity on the 99.
Question for the group; since this would potentially be my first commercial flying job...how do guys generally fare in training going directly to the left seat in the 99? Is this a big leap or is the training built to accommodate someone in their first commercial role? Training success rate?
About me; i'm no Bob Hoover, but i'm pretty confident in my stick and rudder ability. Most of my time is in TW and have done quite a bit of mountain flying. Also ex-military (Turbine Tech) with a B.S. in Engineering (G.I.Bill) and comfortable drinking from a fire hose academically. That said, i know commercial flying is a whole different ball of wax; i'm prepared and expecting to be humbled.
Thanks in advance everyone.
Question for the group; since this would potentially be my first commercial flying job...how do guys generally fare in training going directly to the left seat in the 99? Is this a big leap or is the training built to accommodate someone in their first commercial role? Training success rate?
About me; i'm no Bob Hoover, but i'm pretty confident in my stick and rudder ability. Most of my time is in TW and have done quite a bit of mountain flying. Also ex-military (Turbine Tech) with a B.S. in Engineering (G.I.Bill) and comfortable drinking from a fire hose academically. That said, i know commercial flying is a whole different ball of wax; i'm prepared and expecting to be humbled.
Thanks in advance everyone.
Thanks
#5013
#5014
In a land of unicorns
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Whale FO
Posts: 6,469
#5015
Being able to fly an airplane is important, but it’s more about your instrument ability. You’ll want to have a strong knowledge of instrument rules and procedures. Be able to handle a garmin (not sure what Ameriflight has in there airplanes). You’ll want to practice flying under the hood or in a sim with a 6 pack/HSI. You won’t have time to learn instrument and the 99 at the same time. The 99 is a very easy airplane to fly and the emergency items are straight forward. You will need to become standardized and somewhat robotic/automatic when doing things. The airplane is flown with a very light touch, and always trim off the control pressure. You’ll want to know the power setting and appropriate air speeds for various stages of flying.
#5016
Line Holder
Joined APC: May 2019
Posts: 75
Being able to fly an airplane is important, but it’s more about your instrument ability. You’ll want to have a strong knowledge of instrument rules and procedures. Be able to handle a garmin (not sure what Ameriflight has in there airplanes). You’ll want to practice flying under the hood or in a sim with a 6 pack/HSI. You won’t have time to learn instrument and the 99 at the same time. The 99 is a very easy airplane to fly and the emergency items are straight forward. You will need to become standardized and somewhat robotic/automatic when doing things. The airplane is flown with a very light touch, and always trim off the control pressure. You’ll want to know the power setting and appropriate air speeds for various stages of flying.
Not sure if it still applies, but back a few years in this thread there was a lot of discussion about training failures; one number thrown out was 50%. That’s a little sobering, don’t know if that was fact or fiction though.
#5017
Thank you very much. My plane (which I have done all my training in) has a Garmin 650 and an old six pack. I pretty much spend all my time flying under the hood and doing cross countries, still trying to build night time.
Not sure if it still applies, but back a few years in this thread there was a lot of discussion about training failures; one number thrown out was 50%. That’s a little sobering, don’t know if that was fact or fiction though.
Not sure if it still applies, but back a few years in this thread there was a lot of discussion about training failures; one number thrown out was 50%. That’s a little sobering, don’t know if that was fact or fiction though.
That training failure rate is not accurate. Each aircraft is going to have a different percentage.
Our recruiters will go through your experience with you and make sure the BE99 as a DEC is the right fit for you. With what you've mentioned so far, it sounds like you'd be a great fit for the BE99.
AMF training is tough, but only because they need you to be trained/prepared. Study what they send you, have a good attitude, and you should be good to go.
#5018
Line Holder
Joined APC: May 2019
Posts: 75
In the 99, it will be a Garmin 650 or a Garmin 750.
That training failure rate is not accurate. Each aircraft is going to have a different percentage.
Our recruiters will go through your experience with you and make sure the BE99 as a DEC is the right fit for you. With what you've mentioned so far, it sounds like you'd be a great fit for the BE99.
AMF training is tough, but only because they need you to be trained/prepared. Study what they send you, have a good attitude, and you should be good to go.
That training failure rate is not accurate. Each aircraft is going to have a different percentage.
Our recruiters will go through your experience with you and make sure the BE99 as a DEC is the right fit for you. With what you've mentioned so far, it sounds like you'd be a great fit for the BE99.
AMF training is tough, but only because they need you to be trained/prepared. Study what they send you, have a good attitude, and you should be good to go.
#5019
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Position: Any
Posts: 656
I'm gonna copy this over to the primary AMF thread. I know recruiting monitors that one.
#5020
Line Holder
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 64
AMF Training
I'm happy to answer any questions.
Good luck!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post