Boutique Air
#921
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Posts: 157
SeaPort closed its doors due to losing PDT, I'd be surprised if they made that decision before knowing if boutique was going to get the route or not? Perhaps it was the investor prematurely pulling out that broke the camel's back.
#923
The loss of PDT was a small part of SeaPort shutting its doors. They also lost a line of credit that was keeping them afloat. Also lost 3 other EAS routes in the last 2 months to Boutique. And a few other items in the bankruptcy made continuing a issue.
#924
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Posts: 31
But Boutique Air is also heading down the same path that SeaPort did: 100% dependency on EAS revenues for their network and a VERY stretched network. I read on another board where someone compared the likes of Big Sky, Great Lakes (to some extent), Air Midwest that those airlines had extremely thin resources and look where they are today. Great Lakes jumped in to fill the gaps of Skyway, RegionsAir, and Air Midwest - and look where Great Lakes is today.
Just let that sink in.
I'm not saying Boutique is in trouble, but 100% reliance on EAS subsidies is not a healthy foundation for a company. Congress could decide tomorrow to not fund EAS in FY17 if they wanted to.
There are only a very small handful of airlines that have little to no reliance on EAS subsidies -- Seaborne (albeit they get lots of government subsidies by other means), Island Air (Hawaii), now Silver, Mokulele, and Tradewind.
Just let that sink in.
I'm not saying Boutique is in trouble, but 100% reliance on EAS subsidies is not a healthy foundation for a company. Congress could decide tomorrow to not fund EAS in FY17 if they wanted to.
There are only a very small handful of airlines that have little to no reliance on EAS subsidies -- Seaborne (albeit they get lots of government subsidies by other means), Island Air (Hawaii), now Silver, Mokulele, and Tradewind.
#925
But Boutique Air is also heading down the same path that SeaPort did: 100% dependency on EAS revenues for their network and a VERY stretched network. I read on another board where someone compared the likes of Big Sky, Great Lakes (to some extent), Air Midwest that those airlines had extremely thin resources and look where they are today. Great Lakes jumped in to fill the gaps of Skyway, RegionsAir, and Air Midwest - and look where Great Lakes is today.
Just let that sink in.
I'm not saying Boutique is in trouble, but 100% reliance on EAS subsidies is not a healthy foundation for a company. Congress could decide tomorrow to not fund EAS in FY17 if they wanted to.
There are only a very small handful of airlines that have little to no reliance on EAS subsidies -- Seaborne (albeit they get lots of government subsidies by other means), Island Air (Hawaii), now Silver, Mokulele, and Tradewind.
Just let that sink in.
I'm not saying Boutique is in trouble, but 100% reliance on EAS subsidies is not a healthy foundation for a company. Congress could decide tomorrow to not fund EAS in FY17 if they wanted to.
There are only a very small handful of airlines that have little to no reliance on EAS subsidies -- Seaborne (albeit they get lots of government subsidies by other means), Island Air (Hawaii), now Silver, Mokulele, and Tradewind.
But I agree 100% EAS is not a good business strategy especially with the DOT shutting down routes.
#926
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2015
Posts: 354
But Boutique Air is also heading down the same path that SeaPort did: 100% dependency on EAS revenues for their network and a VERY stretched network. I read on another board where someone compared the likes of Big Sky, Great Lakes (to some extent), Air Midwest that those airlines had extremely thin resources and look where they are today. Great Lakes jumped in to fill the gaps of Skyway, RegionsAir, and Air Midwest - and look where Great Lakes is today.
Just let that sink in.
I'm not saying Boutique is in trouble, but 100% reliance on EAS subsidies is not a healthy foundation for a company. Congress could decide tomorrow to not fund EAS in FY17 if they wanted to.
There are only a very small handful of airlines that have little to no reliance on EAS subsidies -- Seaborne (albeit they get lots of government subsidies by other means), Island Air (Hawaii), now Silver, Mokulele, and Tradewind.
Just let that sink in.
I'm not saying Boutique is in trouble, but 100% reliance on EAS subsidies is not a healthy foundation for a company. Congress could decide tomorrow to not fund EAS in FY17 if they wanted to.
There are only a very small handful of airlines that have little to no reliance on EAS subsidies -- Seaborne (albeit they get lots of government subsidies by other means), Island Air (Hawaii), now Silver, Mokulele, and Tradewind.
#927
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 140
#929
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Posts: 117
That's never any good. Or so I've heard.
#930
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 227
I can't speak for ATL, DFW you're basically showing up at 12-1pm, flying til 8ish, back out to the airplane at around 5am, back to DFW by 12-1. Its not a bad schedule, the worst part is the silver city route, but supposedly thats changing towards the end of October.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post