Search
Notices
Part 91 and Low Time Jump pilots, crop dusting, and other Part 91 jobs

Eagle Jet International

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-21-2010, 12:02 PM
  #71  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: PA-31/left, LJ31/right
Posts: 350
Default

Originally Posted by own nav View Post
Which cargo FO's job did freightdog1369 take? You know AMF would fly that plane single pilot without him. If you want to argue the legality of logging that time, maybe your friend at Ameriflight can show you where it is in their ops specs. The FAA signed off on it, it's legal.

Well I must say, you've done a very good job of steering this thread away from where it was headed. A few things I'd like to point out

#1: SIC time in a Barron/Cheiftain is worthless.

#2: PFT/PFJ does nothing but devalue the people who work in this industry

#3: Paying for a job vs. getting paid for a job; what would you rather have.

FlyJSH said it best(I think it was him), how would you feel if you were furloughed because someone was willing to pay $100k for a PIC slot in one of AmFlights Metro's? You are off on some completely different tangent. So, you go ahead and take that SIC Chieftain time to your next company and tell me what it gets you. Legal and moral are always two completely different thigs BTW. I don't care if their Op Spec allows the logging of SIC time for any of their aircraft. I haven't looked at it, nor do I care to. It's the pricipal of the thing. I don't care what company it's for either. Your still trolling for something. Quit beating around the bush.


Look at the poll results of what your peers think of it.
http://www.airlinepilotforums.com/ha...t-say-you.html
mshunter is offline  
Old 07-21-2010, 01:08 PM
  #72  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: single pilot cargo, turboprop
Posts: 484
Default

I'll address your statements on Fo's driving down regional wages once you acknowledge that they do get jobs. How can they have an effect on wages if they don't get jobs in the first place?

As far as your poll goes, once again you've lumped them all into one. However, I've seen another poll that separates the cargo FO gigs from the Gulfstream type. Maybe you should look that one up instead of starting a poll with a leading question. That one actually got a lot of responses. You got told you're "beating a dead horse."
own nav is offline  
Old 07-21-2010, 01:38 PM
  #73  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: PA-31/left, LJ31/right
Posts: 350
Default

[quote=fr8dog1369;844199]

Originally Posted by own nav View Post
I'll address your statements on Fo's driving down regional wages once you acknowledge that they do get jobs. How can they have an effect on wages if they don't get jobs in the first place?

As far as your poll goes, once again you've lumped them all into one. However, I've seen another poll that separates the cargo FO gigs from the Gulfstream type. Maybe you should look that one up instead of starting a poll with a leading question. That one actually got a lot of responses. You got told you're "beating a dead horse."

You two just don't get it. And unfortunatly, you never will either. Someday, someone down the line will offer you a job, and find out about the PFT/PFJ in your logbook, and you'll get it then.
mshunter is offline  
Old 07-21-2010, 03:58 PM
  #74  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: PA-31/left, LJ31/right
Posts: 350
Default

http://www.airlinepilotforums.com/pa...ch-job-il.html

Not only will you gain experince, but you'll earn a paycheck doint it. And, only 350tt required.
mshunter is offline  
Old 07-21-2010, 07:18 PM
  #75  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 450
Default

Originally Posted by own nav View Post
If you want to argue the legality of logging that time, maybe your friend at Ameriflight can show you where it is in their ops specs.
You need to learn a little more about OpSpecs. OpSpecs cannot "allow" one to log flight time. 14 CFR 61.51 does that.

61.51 does make an allowance for a pilot, when a required crew-member, to log SIC time. Things like actually acting as SIC of a two pilot airplane, Part 135 Pax carrying IFR operations and safety pilots come to mind. Sitting in the right seat of a single pilot aircraft carrying cargo under Part 135 does not make one a required crew-member.

Log what you want, but the OpSpecs can't change that.

My offer still stands if someone wants to PFT/PFJ. I'll let you sit in the left seat of a jjjjjjjjjjet and push all the buttons you want for the right price.

-mini
minitour is offline  
Old 07-22-2010, 06:38 AM
  #76  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: single pilot cargo, turboprop
Posts: 484
Default

Originally Posted by minitour View Post
You need to learn a little more about OpSpecs. OpSpecs cannot "allow" one to log flight time. 14 CFR 61.51 does that.

61.51 does make an allowance for a pilot, when a required crew-member, to log SIC time. Things like actually acting as SIC of a two pilot airplane, Part 135 Pax carrying IFR operations and safety pilots come to mind. Sitting in the right seat of a single pilot aircraft carrying cargo under Part 135 does not make one a required crew-member.

Log what you want, but the OpSpecs can't change that.

My offer still stands if someone wants to PFT/PFJ. I'll let you sit in the left seat of a jjjjjjjjjjet and push all the buttons you want for the right price.

-mini
The FAA giveth and the FAA taketh away. They're regulations, not the bible, you can add to and take away, sometimes the changes aren't applicable to everyone, thus you have ops specs.
own nav is offline  
Old 07-22-2010, 07:21 AM
  #77  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: single pilot cargo, turboprop
Posts: 484
Default

Originally Posted by mshunter View Post
http://www.airlinepilotforums.com/pa...ch-job-il.html

Not only will you gain experince, but you'll earn a paycheck doint it. And, only 350tt required.
If you click on the link, it will tell you "sorry, job no longer available." Did you notice the date on that thread?

I'm thinking freightdog1369 is right about you. I was giving you the benefit of the doubt for a while there, but this is getting ridiculous.
own nav is offline  
Old 07-22-2010, 08:40 AM
  #78  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: PA-31/left, LJ31/right
Posts: 350
Default

Originally Posted by own nav View Post
If you click on the link, it will tell you "sorry, job no longer available." Did you notice the date on that thread?

I'm thinking freightdog1369 is right about you. I was giving you the benefit of the doubt for a while there, but this is getting ridiculous.

Awwwww, how sweet of you. The purpose was to show that low time jobs are out there. But I guess you just can't educate some people.
mshunter is offline  
Old 07-22-2010, 09:20 AM
  #79  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 59
Default

Originally Posted by mshunter View Post
Awwwww, how sweet of you. The purpose was to show that low time jobs are out there. But I guess you just can't educate some people.

Valiant effort, but you're wasting your time. People either have what it takes to make it on their own in this industry or they don't. Of those that don't, some people simply have the money (or access to it) to buy their way up the ladder. There isn't a single thing either one of us can do about it and you're never going to convince them it's wrong on an internet message board.
miller is offline  
Old 07-22-2010, 02:59 PM
  #80  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: PA-31/left, LJ31/right
Posts: 350
Default

Originally Posted by miller View Post
Valiant effort, but you're wasting your time. People either have what it takes to make it on their own in this industry or they don't. Of those that don't, some people simply have the money (or access to it) to buy their way up the ladder. There isn't a single thing either one of us can do about it and you're never going to convince them it's wrong on an internet message board.

It's like ****ing into the wind. No matter what, yer gunna get wet!
mshunter is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EWRflyr
Major
57
09-23-2009 05:30 PM
FlyArmy
Military
8
07-19-2009 12:57 PM
FlyinSunset1
Major
14
01-28-2009 08:49 PM
PIPErdrvr
Regional
10
11-22-2008 05:45 PM
RockBottom
Regional
1
03-16-2005 11:10 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices