Piedmont Airlines News & Rumors
#3251
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Position: DHC-8 CA
Posts: 462
That is fine to want..... But to violate a contract (change an agreement) to make it a reality is a little disconcerting to be honest. A slippery slope the more You think about it. An LOA is a contract, an agreement, you shouldn’t be able to change it willy nilly. If they really wanted it, then they should have put it in a contract that was agreed upon.
If AAG gets away with this, who is to stop them from adding 3 year CA requirement? Heck, why not 5 years? Why not Check Airmen? Why not a 4 year degree too? Why not a Masters? Where does it stop?
Then the flow we have and agreed to in a contract, is no longer the flow we agreed to, and put up with our bottom tier pay for the “light at the end of the tunnel” was all for not. Your chances will be better with just an application and a better paying regional.
I don’t know what PSA or Envoys contract looked like, but sounds like those union dues need to be put to use and lawyer up.
If AAG gets away with this, who is to stop them from adding 3 year CA requirement? Heck, why not 5 years? Why not Check Airmen? Why not a 4 year degree too? Why not a Masters? Where does it stop?
Then the flow we have and agreed to in a contract, is no longer the flow we agreed to, and put up with our bottom tier pay for the “light at the end of the tunnel” was all for not. Your chances will be better with just an application and a better paying regional.
I don’t know what PSA or Envoys contract looked like, but sounds like those union dues need to be put to use and lawyer up.
#3252
Banned
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 761
And the changes to the flow agreement were voted on, and agreed upon, by the unions at PSA and Envoy btw. Contract changes are normal. We wouldn’t have the flow if we didn’t agree to change our contract
Try applying outside the flow and tell me how easy it is to get hired. Way waaaay harder than 3 years of captain experience and a bogus communications degree bruh
#3253
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Posts: 634
Have to have PIC experience and a basic college education to make it to the biggest airline in the world?!? Gasp! The horrors! Fact is, most of the people flowing wouldn’t have a snowballs chance in helI if it weren’t for the flow. Count your lucky stars.
And the changes to the flow agreement were voted on, and agreed upon, by the unions at PSA and Envoy btw. Contract changes are normal. We wouldn’t have the flow if we didn’t agree to change our contract
Try applying outside the flow and tell me how easy it is to get hired. Way waaaay harder than 3 years of captain experience and a bogus communications degree bruh
And the changes to the flow agreement were voted on, and agreed upon, by the unions at PSA and Envoy btw. Contract changes are normal. We wouldn’t have the flow if we didn’t agree to change our contract
Try applying outside the flow and tell me how easy it is to get hired. Way waaaay harder than 3 years of captain experience and a bogus communications degree bruh
Majority of the FOs getting ready to flow did not become Captains for a variety of personal reasons and its only a handful who were unable to because of skill, aptitude, or attitude. They were promised a flow and I think they deserve a flow. It's not even a linear comparison between PDT and ENY/PSA because at our sister companies FOs are FORCED to upgrade at minimums. If the company didn't require them to become Captains and agreed it would be fine for them to flow as an FO, why should they be punished now after years of service?
Personally, I could give a damn less how hard it is to get hired outside the flow. The flow was probably a big reason people chose PDT and I think management and AA should hold up their end of the bargain. We have a great group of guys and girls here and I hope we all move on to bigger and better, especially when that was the promise to begin with. The only change to the flow the MEC should entertain is to increase it. Anything that harms our current pilots should be rejected.
#3254
Banned
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 761
So you think it's fair to strip our First Officers of the flow they were promised because management decided to arbitrarily change the standard? Their tenure counts for nothing? What about the sim instructors and program managers that were never allowed to get trained as Captains? F 'em bc its hard to get hired outside of the flow???
Majority of the FOs getting ready to flow did not become Captains for a variety of personal reasons and its only a handful who were unable to because of skill, aptitude, or attitude. They were promised a flow and I think they deserve a flow. It's not even a linear comparison between PDT and ENY/PSA because at our sister companies FOs are FORCED to upgrade at minimums. If the company didn't require them to become Captains and agreed it would be fine for them to flow as an FO, why should they be punished now after years of service?
Personally, I could give a damn less how hard it is to get hired outside the flow. The flow was probably a big reason people chose PDT and I think management and AA should hold up their end of the bargain. We have a great group of guys and girls here and I hope we all move on to bigger and better, especially when that was the promise to begin with. The only change to the flow the MEC should entertain is to increase it. Anything that harms our current pilots should be rejected.
Majority of the FOs getting ready to flow did not become Captains for a variety of personal reasons and its only a handful who were unable to because of skill, aptitude, or attitude. They were promised a flow and I think they deserve a flow. It's not even a linear comparison between PDT and ENY/PSA because at our sister companies FOs are FORCED to upgrade at minimums. If the company didn't require them to become Captains and agreed it would be fine for them to flow as an FO, why should they be punished now after years of service?
Personally, I could give a damn less how hard it is to get hired outside the flow. The flow was probably a big reason people chose PDT and I think management and AA should hold up their end of the bargain. We have a great group of guys and girls here and I hope we all move on to bigger and better, especially when that was the promise to begin with. The only change to the flow the MEC should entertain is to increase it. Anything that harms our current pilots should be rejected.
#3255
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Posts: 264
I don’t know why everyone is getting riled up about this stuff. There is zero negotiating going on right now.
We are staying at 60 jets for the time being. Flow is six. We are staffed. If you can hold an upgrade and want to have PIC on your resume then take an upgrade ASAP. We may be only upgrading 6-8/month in line with attrition for the next year.
If you have a golden ticket out of the muck. Then take it. I tell all new hires to apply at F9, NK, K4 as soon as line Qualified. These carriers have good contracts. Many captains there will be making 250+. With a DC retirement. Some would say that is a great income. If you are within 24 months of flow it becomes a personal choice.
When the downturn happens all the people who have never seen one will have their eyes opened on how bad hiring can be and wish they wouldn’t have passed on any interview let alone the big 3-5
Get out while you still can
We are staying at 60 jets for the time being. Flow is six. We are staffed. If you can hold an upgrade and want to have PIC on your resume then take an upgrade ASAP. We may be only upgrading 6-8/month in line with attrition for the next year.
If you have a golden ticket out of the muck. Then take it. I tell all new hires to apply at F9, NK, K4 as soon as line Qualified. These carriers have good contracts. Many captains there will be making 250+. With a DC retirement. Some would say that is a great income. If you are within 24 months of flow it becomes a personal choice.
When the downturn happens all the people who have never seen one will have their eyes opened on how bad hiring can be and wish they wouldn’t have passed on any interview let alone the big 3-5
Get out while you still can
#3257
I don’t know why everyone is getting riled up about this stuff. There is zero negotiating going on right now.
We are staying at 60 jets for the time being. Flow is six. We are staffed. If you can hold an upgrade and want to have PIC on your resume then take an upgrade ASAP. We may be only upgrading 6-8/month in line with attrition for the next year.
If you have a golden ticket out of the muck. Then take it. I tell all new hires to apply at F9, NK, K4 as soon as line Qualified. These carriers have good contracts. Many captains there will be making 250+. With a DC retirement. Some would say that is a great income. If you are within 24 months of flow it becomes a personal choice.
When the downturn happens all the people who have never seen one will have their eyes opened on how bad hiring can be and wish they wouldn’t have passed on any interview let alone the big 3-5
Get out while you still can
We are staying at 60 jets for the time being. Flow is six. We are staffed. If you can hold an upgrade and want to have PIC on your resume then take an upgrade ASAP. We may be only upgrading 6-8/month in line with attrition for the next year.
If you have a golden ticket out of the muck. Then take it. I tell all new hires to apply at F9, NK, K4 as soon as line Qualified. These carriers have good contracts. Many captains there will be making 250+. With a DC retirement. Some would say that is a great income. If you are within 24 months of flow it becomes a personal choice.
When the downturn happens all the people who have never seen one will have their eyes opened on how bad hiring can be and wish they wouldn’t have passed on any interview let alone the big 3-5
Get out while you still can
Not sure that there are zero negotiations though. When they are at the table for these kind of discussions it’s not public knowledge.
#3258
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Position: E145 CA
Posts: 120
There's always some kind of negotiation going on, just not necessarily anything as earth-shattering as last year's TA (which itself was not earth-shattering).
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post