Search

Notices
PSA Airlines Regional Airline

Stop coming here

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-11-2018 | 05:21 PM
  #101  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FlyingSlowly
You completely missed the point. Or you purposefully misquoted me to prove yours. I said a Captain should make $150k, not that $150k should be the base starting salary. I never said or implied that aviation is MORE sacred than other professions. My attitude is far from it. Just that it should pay more LIKE other professional occupations. But if you want to argue for less pay...by all means go for it.



Do your research before throwing out hypotheticals. CLT is the most profitable hub the world's largest airline. AAG is not hemorrhaging cash to pay us. Quite the opposite. They are making tons of cash because of the support that PSA provides to the CLT hub. Furthermore, the reason that they have been growing PSA is because we are already cheaper than the non W/O options.

It's not just about my ideas on the matter... If you observe the regional industry as a whole, other regional options are largely downsizing or consolidating. It starts to become pretty obvious that the remaining options for taking the place of PSA are either more expensive, or have fleet teething issues of their own. But if you want to help weaken our collective bargaining position by buying into, or even promoting management-style scare tactics, that's your right to do so...
Actually AA is not going to be "good" by comparison this year to other airlines profit. May even be the least profitable airline this year, and they have the largest fleet with the most RJ scope.
Reply
Old 09-11-2018 | 08:39 PM
  #102  
Irishblackbird's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Happyflyer
Actually AA is not going to be "good" by comparison this year to other airlines profit. May even be the least profitable airline this year, and they have the largest fleet with the most RJ scope.
Yep, how deep into Dads wallet did we get when we wiped out his Buick this past summer?
Reply
Old 09-11-2018 | 08:45 PM
  #103  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Default

$35 million according to USA today...
Reply
Old 09-12-2018 | 04:11 AM
  #104  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 438
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by Irishblackbird
Yep, how deep into Dads wallet did we get when we wiped out his Buick this past summer?
Just as PSA management takes no responsibility when things go wrong, I am certainly not taking any for that one.
Reply
Old 09-12-2018 | 04:14 AM
  #105  
chrisreedrules's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,601
Likes: 0
From: CRJ FO
Default

Originally Posted by Jecain7
$35 million according to USA today...
Enough to give every pilot on property a $18 /hour raise.

And while not insignificant, that $35 million dollars is just a footnote for AAG. They look at that number and don’t even blink. AAG reported a pre-tax profit of $769 million dollars just for this 2nd quarter by itself.

But hey, it’s a business. They aren’t in the business of handing out many when and where they don’t think they need to. We’re filling classes and attrition is manageable. Until that changes or we find ourselves with some more leverage this is it.
Reply
Old 09-12-2018 | 04:17 AM
  #106  
chrisreedrules's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,601
Likes: 0
From: CRJ FO
Default

Originally Posted by irrelevant
Just as PSA management takes no responsibility when things go wrong, I am certainly not taking any for that one.
But you know truthfully, why should they take any more accountability than they already do? It’s not like AAG writes PSA managment a blank check and says, “here go buy whatever you need”. They have budgets and things like tens of million spent on a new IT infrastructure are hard to justify at a time when fuel prices are surging and the industry is on the cusp of retirements that will put the leverage in the hands of labor for the next decade.

It’s not like they didn’t have some idea that the IT infrastructure was dated and at risk. If AAG doesn’t want to spend money on it, PSA doesn’t get new IT. If AAG doesn’t want pilots at its WOs to get a raise, they don’t get a raise. It’s not as if our managment is calling these shots.
Reply
Old 09-12-2018 | 04:20 AM
  #107  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 438
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by chrisreedrules
But you know truthfully, why should they take any more accountability than they already do? It’s not like AAG writes PSA managment a blank check and says, “here go buy whatever you need”. They have budgets and things like tens of million spent on a new IT infrastructure are hard to justify at a time when fuel prices are surging and the industry is on the cusp of retirements that will put the leverage in the hands of labor for the next decade.
Because they are responsible for the operation.
Reply
Old 09-12-2018 | 04:23 AM
  #108  
chrisreedrules's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,601
Likes: 0
From: CRJ FO
Default

Originally Posted by irrelevant
Because they are responsible for the operation.
Right. They are responsible for making sure the wheels stay on this bus so to speak. But they aren’t any more responsible for this than the regional manager of a fast food chain is of their different locations. If corporate doesn’t think they need new digital cash registers, they don’t get new cash registers despite this regional manager telling them otherwise.
Reply
Old 09-12-2018 | 05:05 AM
  #109  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 438
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by chrisreedrules
Right. They are responsible for making sure the wheels stay on this bus so to speak. But they aren’t any more responsible for this than the regional manager of a fast food chain is of their different locations. If corporate doesn’t think they need new digital cash registers, they don’t get new cash registers despite this regional manager telling them otherwise.
They certainly didn't do an admirable job of keeping the wheels on the bus back in June.

I have higher expectations of management of a supposedly stand-alone company than you do. This is probably due in part to my disdain for the way the industry is structured, with legacy carriers utilizing contractors and subsidiaries to avoid paying wage levels they otherwise would if they performed the services "in-house". Meanwhile the legacy carrier still effectively exercises "operational control", and portrays the service level as equal to the legacy brand...until something goes wrong...then it's the subsidiary's fault.

I'd probably be more willing to accept the above, if someone would step up and accept responsibility and accountability. That doesn't happen though with PSA. It's always "outside our control"...which leads to the rational question - "If it's outside our control, how does anything anyone does matter?"

I applaud you for being able to better accept the reality of the situation. You're probably even able to wear the American Airlines lanyard to hold your badge on...despite the fact that our pay comes not from AA, but from PSA.

I struggle with the "pay no attention to the man behind the curtain" operating philosophy. You can consider it a character flaw.
Reply
Old 09-12-2018 | 07:13 AM
  #110  
chrisreedrules's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,601
Likes: 0
From: CRJ FO
Default

Originally Posted by irrelevant
They certainly didn't do an admirable job of keeping the wheels on the bus back in June.

I have higher expectations of management of a supposedly stand-alone company than you do. This is probably due in part to my disdain for the way the industry is structured, with legacy carriers utilizing contractors and subsidiaries to avoid paying wage levels they otherwise would if they performed the services "in-house". Meanwhile the legacy carrier still effectively exercises "operational control", and portrays the service level as equal to the legacy brand...until something goes wrong...then it's the subsidiary's fault.

I'd probably be more willing to accept the above, if someone would step up and accept responsibility and accountability. That doesn't happen though with PSA. It's always "outside our control"...which leads to the rational question - "If it's outside our control, how does anything anyone does matter?"

I applaud you for being able to better accept the reality of the situation. You're probably even able to wear the American Airlines lanyard to hold your badge on...despite the fact that our pay comes not from AA, but from PSA.

I struggle with the "pay no attention to the man behind the curtain" operating philosophy. You can consider it a character flaw.
I’d really rather wear a different lanyard. I wish PSA ALPA would make some.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Chunkylove
Cargo
3
10-21-2009 09:21 AM
AUS_ATC
Cargo
106
12-23-2006 05:59 PM
AUS_ATC
Major
24
12-18-2006 07:56 AM
Topper
Major
10
08-31-2006 01:33 PM
SWAjet
Hangar Talk
0
09-27-2005 11:36 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices