I Love PSA
#221
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
By no means. I dont think recalling a ton would be the best news for PSA either. It would make you think furloughs would come in the fall. I for one do not want a summer job. An increase in summer normally is followed by a decrease in the fall. Thus due to nearly ZERO attrition in the past year (maybe 5 pilots left whom were holding lines) makes on hesitant to get too excited about any of this news.
#222
By no means. I dont think recalling a ton would be the best news for PSA either. It would make you think furloughs would come in the fall. I for one do not want a summer job. An increase in summer normally is followed by a decrease in the fall. Thus due to nearly ZERO attrition in the past year (maybe 5 pilots left whom were holding lines) makes on hesitant to get too excited about any of this news.
#223
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
Because I know you want your job back and will pick up open time as you have bragged about in other post. Plus the fiance just took a job in Ohio. So its time to move from Indy anyways. But thanks for asking.
It may not be the news you all are looking for but the fact of the matter is there's a great chance it might happen. But if I get let go again at least when I come back for the third time I'll be on second year pay.
It may not be the news you all are looking for but the fact of the matter is there's a great chance it might happen. But if I get let go again at least when I come back for the third time I'll be on second year pay.
#224
Because I know you want your job back and will pick up open time as you have bragged about in other post. Plus the fiance just took a job in Ohio. So its time to move from Indy anyways. But thanks for asking.
It may not be the news you all are looking for but the fact of the matter is there's a great chance it might happen. But if I get let go again at least when I come back for the third time I'll be on second year pay.
It may not be the news you all are looking for but the fact of the matter is there's a great chance it might happen. But if I get let go again at least when I come back for the third time I'll be on second year pay.
#225
Because I know you want your job back and will pick up open time as you have bragged about in other post. Plus the fiance just took a job in Ohio. So its time to move from Indy anyways. But thanks for asking.
It may not be the news you all are looking for but the fact of the matter is there's a great chance it might happen. But if I get let go again at least when I come back for the third time I'll be on second year pay.
It may not be the news you all are looking for but the fact of the matter is there's a great chance it might happen. But if I get let go again at least when I come back for the third time I'll be on second year pay.
#226
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
Any comment you could find about me picking up open time would be a joke. You might also notice it says my position is left seat PA-44 that is also a joke. I am actually quite outspoken about not picking up open time, but thanks for playing. However it would be great if you laid off the PDT guys about comments of us taking their flying or whatever, your making us look bad. Just let it go.
And the PDT guys? What are you talking about? Making US look bad? Seriously dude come on now. No where have I said anything about taking their flying. It was a statement made on the union website that some felt PDT crews were made because their furlough was the reason we were bringing guys back. Obviously that's not the case since they are no longer going to furlough or downgrade. No where have I said, "Thank god they were reduced because we are gaining." As a matter of a fact I have put on here I think we need to link our union websites and have more talks between the two groups. But nice try again.
And at the end of the day look at what you are taking offense to. Me simply saying that by bring a bunch of guys back could be a bad thing. Bringing them back to cover flying, and then let them go in the fall. Its a known fact flying will be reduced then. And after spending the last two thursdays with the training department getting ready for recall I have been told my everyone in that department they do not want to recall to furlough. Thus they are going to be hesitant in bring a great number back. And if anything arent you a Jan 08 hire? So you are comming back due to the three in my class whom bypassed? Anyways if you think it'd be great to bring them all back, I ask you why? We arent getting any more planes, we arent going to gain a crap load of fall flying, and lastly none of our guys are going to mainline (thus all the 2008 hires were for the flowthrough with mainline). So I am trying to see where we would have a need for all 79 guys back on property.
Hell I'd be all for it. One of my best friends is 20 from the bottom! He I want back with me on Monday but I dont see it happening right now. Its a matter of ones own thoughts. And you are entitled to yours as well.
Last edited by meyers9163; 04-15-2009 at 07:22 PM.
#227
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
And I care why again? Take it over to the union forum where you cannot hide behind a screen name. I have always on all forums kept my name some what public. I have no need to hide behind a screen name like yourself.
#228
I cannot wait to see you Monday. It will be fun! You have been quoted on here before about cannot wait to get back to pick up all that open time. Perhaps you were joking. It was not read that way though. I hope you truely are against open time while guys are on furlough.
And the PDT guys? What are you talking about? Making US look bad? Seriously dude come on now. No where have I said anything about taking their flying. It was a statement made on the union website that some felt PDT crews were made because their furlough was the reason we were bringing guys back. Obviously that's not the case since they are no longer going to furlough or downgrade. No where have I said, "Thank god they were reduced because we are gaining." As a matter of a fact I have put on here I think we need to link our union websites and have more talks between the two groups. But nice try again.
And at the end of the day look at what you are taking offense to. Me simply saying that by bring a bunch of guys back could be a bad thing. Bringing them back to cover flying, and then let them go in the fall. Its a known fact flying will be reduced then. And after spending the last two thursdays with the training department getting ready for recall I have been told my everyone in that department they do not want to recall to furlough. Thus they are going to be hesitant in bring a great number back. And if anything arent you a Jan 08 hire? So you are comming back due to 3 of my classmates bypassing?
And the PDT guys? What are you talking about? Making US look bad? Seriously dude come on now. No where have I said anything about taking their flying. It was a statement made on the union website that some felt PDT crews were made because their furlough was the reason we were bringing guys back. Obviously that's not the case since they are no longer going to furlough or downgrade. No where have I said, "Thank god they were reduced because we are gaining." As a matter of a fact I have put on here I think we need to link our union websites and have more talks between the two groups. But nice try again.
And at the end of the day look at what you are taking offense to. Me simply saying that by bring a bunch of guys back could be a bad thing. Bringing them back to cover flying, and then let them go in the fall. Its a known fact flying will be reduced then. And after spending the last two thursdays with the training department getting ready for recall I have been told my everyone in that department they do not want to recall to furlough. Thus they are going to be hesitant in bring a great number back. And if anything arent you a Jan 08 hire? So you are comming back due to 3 of my classmates bypassing?
Nobody cares if your classmates bypass dude. It means nothing. Should CaptainKrunch kowtow to you, or anyone else? Pay tribute? You need to get off your high horse, and stop making PSA look bad by being so condescending, and posting non-sense over here. That includes attacking Republic pilots in your other posts.
#229
I cannot wait to see you Monday. It will be fun! You have been quoted on here before about cannot wait to get back to pick up all that open time. Perhaps you were joking. It was not read that way though. I hope you truely are against open time while guys are on furlough.
And the PDT guys? What are you talking about? Making US look bad? Seriously dude come on now. No where have I said anything about taking their flying. It was a statement made on the union website that some felt PDT crews were made because their furlough was the reason we were bringing guys back. Obviously that's not the case since they are no longer going to furlough or downgrade. No where have I said, "Thank god they were reduced because we are gaining." As a matter of a fact I have put on here I think we need to link our union websites and have more talks between the two groups. But nice try again.
And at the end of the day look at what you are taking offense to. Me simply saying that by bring a bunch of guys back could be a bad thing. Bringing them back to cover flying, and then let them go in the fall. Its a known fact flying will be reduced then. And after spending the last two thursdays with the training department getting ready for recall I have been told my everyone in that department they do not want to recall to furlough. Thus they are going to be hesitant in bring a great number back. And if anything arent you a Jan 08 hire? So you are comming back due to the three in my class whom bypassed? Anyways if you think it'd be great to bring them all back, I ask you why? We arent getting any more planes, we arent going to gain a crap load of fall flying, and lastly none of our guys are going to mainline (thus all the 2008 hires were for the flowthrough with mainline). So I am trying to see where we would have a need for all 79 guys back on property.
Hell I'd be all for it. One of my best friends is 20 from the bottom! He I want back with me on Monday but I dont see it happening right now. Its a matter of ones own thoughts. And you are entitled to yours as well.
And the PDT guys? What are you talking about? Making US look bad? Seriously dude come on now. No where have I said anything about taking their flying. It was a statement made on the union website that some felt PDT crews were made because their furlough was the reason we were bringing guys back. Obviously that's not the case since they are no longer going to furlough or downgrade. No where have I said, "Thank god they were reduced because we are gaining." As a matter of a fact I have put on here I think we need to link our union websites and have more talks between the two groups. But nice try again.
And at the end of the day look at what you are taking offense to. Me simply saying that by bring a bunch of guys back could be a bad thing. Bringing them back to cover flying, and then let them go in the fall. Its a known fact flying will be reduced then. And after spending the last two thursdays with the training department getting ready for recall I have been told my everyone in that department they do not want to recall to furlough. Thus they are going to be hesitant in bring a great number back. And if anything arent you a Jan 08 hire? So you are comming back due to the three in my class whom bypassed? Anyways if you think it'd be great to bring them all back, I ask you why? We arent getting any more planes, we arent going to gain a crap load of fall flying, and lastly none of our guys are going to mainline (thus all the 2008 hires were for the flowthrough with mainline). So I am trying to see where we would have a need for all 79 guys back on property.
Hell I'd be all for it. One of my best friends is 20 from the bottom! He I want back with me on Monday but I dont see it happening right now. Its a matter of ones own thoughts. And you are entitled to yours as well.
Oh relax!!!!
#230
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
Mr Hat feel free to contact me. If you know me, you know how to get a hold of me. You want to bring other forums into this and have no clue. So feel free to contact me. You know me apparently, give me a call or email if you have issues you need to address. Flightinfo, are you serious? It was a comment to a buddy whom simply replied he believes they are still going to furlough come this fall. An observation made that they have more pilots then us, same amount (basically identical) block hours, yet we let 80 go and they had not let any.
And Republic? That's random. I have a right to say what I think about them. Give it a break bro.
Lastly apprently we all agreed on one issue of open time. I've had discussions with BankAngle09 about this topic and we stand on different sides of it. Nothing wrong with discussion. No need to sit back and try to prevent that from happening. At the end of the day, we are all at a regional and no where near a place we want to hang our hat for a career I assume.
Do you have a good reason why bringing all of our furloughed guys back would be a great thing? Do you know something that would lead us to believe they would not just be let go this fall if we bring a large number back? Because I have a strong gut feeling, we bring a lot back, it just increases the chances of a furlough in the fall. But feel free to let me know why you disagree with that. I'd be glad to read why you feel the way you do. Personally being a furloughed guy, which I assume you never had to experience, I do not want to come back just to be let go this fall. And if we bring 79 pilots back with no new planes and already being stated by Joe Rose as an increase in June flying, what makes me think they would not be let go this fall? YOU have noticed in the past 9 months, we've had about 7 pilots in the top 460 leave right?
And Republic? That's random. I have a right to say what I think about them. Give it a break bro.
Lastly apprently we all agreed on one issue of open time. I've had discussions with BankAngle09 about this topic and we stand on different sides of it. Nothing wrong with discussion. No need to sit back and try to prevent that from happening. At the end of the day, we are all at a regional and no where near a place we want to hang our hat for a career I assume.
Do you have a good reason why bringing all of our furloughed guys back would be a great thing? Do you know something that would lead us to believe they would not just be let go this fall if we bring a large number back? Because I have a strong gut feeling, we bring a lot back, it just increases the chances of a furlough in the fall. But feel free to let me know why you disagree with that. I'd be glad to read why you feel the way you do. Personally being a furloughed guy, which I assume you never had to experience, I do not want to come back just to be let go this fall. And if we bring 79 pilots back with no new planes and already being stated by Joe Rose as an increase in June flying, what makes me think they would not be let go this fall? YOU have noticed in the past 9 months, we've had about 7 pilots in the top 460 leave right?
Last edited by meyers9163; 04-15-2009 at 07:45 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



