Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > PSA Airlines
PDT/ EAGLE/ PSA's role at the new AA >

PDT/ EAGLE/ PSA's role at the new AA

Search

Notices
PSA Airlines Regional Airline

PDT/ EAGLE/ PSA's role at the new AA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-27-2012 | 08:53 AM
  #101  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by fullflank
Name calling isnt really necessary, and its YOURE not YOUR tough guy. You posted very clearly 4-7 years gets you senior fo. That will not happen. To negotiate you need to bring something to the table. A bunch of erjs no one wants and a bunkrupt parent airline isnt it.
A. From this source, it seems anytime there's disagreement most of us become "dopes".

B. Who said she was a guy ?
Reply
Old 04-27-2012 | 09:04 AM
  #102  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
From: Ask scheduling
Default

PDT is just an easy target to toss aside because we all know our fleet is our biggest issue. This place "will be closed within the year" ever since I was hired over 5 years ago. I think with the excessive amount of RJ's flying for US Airways, if they wanted to close PDT down they would have already. There are plenty of seats to cover the lift that Mainline wants us to cover. HHH is the only station PDT is truly needed for. They are keeping us around for a reason. If they want to add larger RJ's to the new American feeder, who's to say PDT doesn't have a chance on flying them? PDT is due for a re-fleet anyways. It would be less of a training bubble if they just re-fleet PDT and train us on the new fleet vs merging everyone then going through what PCL is going through. I know it's not what people want to hear, but it is still as possible as anything else. Our pilot group is just as senior as Eagle's is. I'm pretty sure we can handle those Jet things we hear so much about.
Reply
Old 04-27-2012 | 09:09 AM
  #103  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by theHub
PDT is just an easy target to toss aside because we all know our fleet is our biggest issue. This place "will be closed within the year" ever since I was hired over 5 years ago. I think with the excessive amount of RJ's flying for US Airways, if they wanted to close PDT down they would have already. There are plenty of seats to cover the lift that Mainline wants us to cover. HHH is the only station PDT is truly needed for. They are keeping us around for a reason. If they want to add larger RJ's to the new American feeder, who's to say PDT doesn't have a chance on flying them? PDT is due for a re-fleet anyways. It would be less of a training bubble if they just re-fleet PDT and train us on the new fleet vs merging everyone then going through what PCL is going through. I know it's not what people want to hear, but it is still as possible as anything else. Our pilot group is just as senior as Eagle's is. I'm pretty sure we can handle those Jet things we hear so much about.
Truth is no one knows whats going to happen to any of us. Its all just theory. PSA and PDT could easily be sold off to Trans states, republic etc. Delta did so with mesaba and compass, could happen here as well.
Reply
Old 04-27-2012 | 09:12 AM
  #104  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Wingtips
Eaglefly you have to understand 9/11 is over, the age 65 change is now behind us, and the FT/DT and 1500 hour rule are coming. It is not 2008 after a massive economy bubble pop just 7 years after 9/11. You seem to think that a 12 year abnormality, fueled by govt changes and foreign policy blow back, is going to continue. However its coming to a time of self correction.
9/11 is over !!! It seems only yesterday I took off at dawn from my outstation to my hub and watched the whole thing in the crewroom after I got there (Eagle RJ captain at the time).

Jeez.........I had no idea !

FT/DT will be mostly mitigated by PBS at carriers that don't have it (that's you and me especially). Additionally, you DID note all the loopholes included that water's the FT/DT improvements down,yes ?

As an example, most of the major carriers like DAL and UAL said it would only amount to needing another 400 pilots or so and they have seniority lists 4-5 times that of Eagle and much larger then AA. AMR broke ranks and intially stated they'd need an extra 2400 pilots, but once the ridiculousness of that became obvious, they too have tempered that estimate down to close to that of the others. The regionals for the most part (especially with PBS) have the flexibility due to weak scheduling language and rare trip/duty rigs to hardly feel a ripple from that.

The 1500 hour rule will slow the entrance, but already flight schools will get waivers down to 500-800 hourse depending on the program. Considering the majority of previous regional entrants from these sources had at least 5-800 hours, very little change there, which was the whole point as guess who controls government roadblocks to corporate profits as I stated before ?

The shortage will be college entrants seeing the $50-75,000 extra above tuition that they'll have to pay of for a decade or longer for a $25-30,000 year job. Many who would have gone into Pilot positions, either will shun the airlines or go into another career. The philospohy that some "windy" characters on some of those Eagle websites believe that regionals will have to raise pay to get people won't work. They're getting people now and this problem is still several years off. If anything, I'd think they'd find it much cheaper to offer funding for those who go to flight training programs, instead of offering more pay accross the board. I think in 5-7 years it WILL be a problem, but to really change that equation, you'd have to raise regional new-hire pay to at or above a major carrier and then where are they ?

As for age rule changes now being "behind us", I think that is unfortunate assumption. It seems to me you have a lot of disappointment coming your way on the long and bumpy road of this profession with all these pollyanna ideas. Economic forces AGAINST airline pilots have never been greater and leverage has never been weaker.
Reply
Old 04-27-2012 | 11:24 AM
  #105  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
From: DHC-8 FO
Default

Originally Posted by texaspilot76
Maybe so, but the majority of captains at Eagle would be senior to a majority of PSA captains with DOH list. Over half the captains at PSA would be knocked back to FO. Relative is the one and only fair way. No one gains, no one loses.
If you add PDT to the mix with Date of hire you have a couple Captains who were hired in the late 70's plus a boatload form the 80's and early 90's
Reply
Old 04-27-2012 | 12:46 PM
  #106  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
Default

whoever said they keep PDT around for some reason, and want the props............well they had a million reasons why AA wanted the Exec ticket and the ATRs. Seems like none of those matter now.

Also saying it is alot cheaper to train PDT on jets and not a new company. I think they would rather have you guys start over at 1st year pay somewhere new, instead of having 30 year guys flying those jets.

Sounds like good cockpit convo though.
Reply
Old 04-27-2012 | 02:40 PM
  #107  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
From: Ask scheduling
Default

Originally Posted by Wingtips
whoever said they keep PDT around for some reason, and want the props............well they had a million reasons why AA wanted the Exec ticket and the ATRs. Seems like none of those matter now.

Also saying it is alot cheaper to train PDT on jets and not a new company. I think they would rather have you guys start over at 1st year pay somewhere new, instead of having 30 year guys flying those jets.

Sounds like good cockpit convo though.
AA/Eagle is in BK, not US Airways/PDT/PSA. When US Airways WAS in BK, they sill kept us around.

I said they have kept PDT around... never said they wanted to keep props around. The original plan was for the Dash 8's to be done in 08', but since the CRJ's went to PSA instead, and the drop out of the economy, it didn't happen.

When you say "...start over at 1st year pay somewhere new...", do you mean at Eagle? As in we go to the bottom of your list? Just need some clarification here.

Isn't Eagle top heavy on seniority too? What's the difference? You guys keep flying the 700's and train PDT pilots on whatever else they want us to fly. Sell off Eagle to someone new and keep the wholly owned airlines that US Airways already has. Same scenario just opposite of what everyone is talking about. It's easier to get rid of the Dash 8's then it is the ERJ's. Ours are owned. If I'm not mistaken the ERJ's are leased, which may or may not be in our benefit.

Last edited by theHub; 04-27-2012 at 03:04 PM.
Reply
Old 04-27-2012 | 03:20 PM
  #108  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by theHub
AA/Eagle is in BK, not US Airways/PDT/PSA. When US Airways WAS in BK, they sill kept us around.

I said they have kept PDT around... never said they wanted to keep props around. The original plan was for the Dash 8's to be done in 08', but since the CRJ's went to PSA instead, and the drop out of the economy, it didn't happen.

When you say "...start over at 1st year pay somewhere new...", do you mean at Eagle? As in we go to the bottom of your list? Just need some clarification here.

Isn't Eagle top heavy on seniority too? What's the difference? You guys keep flying the 700's and train PDT pilots on whatever else they want us to fly. Sell off Eagle to someone new and keep the wholly owned airlines that US Airways already has. Same scenario just opposite of what everyone is talking about. It's easier to get rid of the Dash 8's then it is the ERJ's. Ours are owned. If I'm not mistaken the ERJ's are leased, which may or may not be in our benefit.
Best thing AA or USAIR could do, is make a new airline and over 5-8 years give it all the flying, or 3 airlines all the flying, then they have a bunch new low cost labor. That was what I was saying. Best thing for any airline is all new pilots, all at low pay. Taking an airline full of old employees and giving them the new planes makes no sense at all.
Reply
Old 04-27-2012 | 08:23 PM
  #109  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Wingtips
Best thing AA or USAIR could do, is make a new airline and over 5-8 years give it all the flying, or 3 airlines all the flying, then they have a bunch new low cost labor. That was what I was saying. Best thing for any airline is all new pilots, all at low pay. Taking an airline full of old employees and giving them the new planes makes no sense at all.

Says the Eagle pilot with a year or less invested. Why are you flying the planes? You seem destined for management.
Reply
Old 04-28-2012 | 06:58 AM
  #110  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Mildred Pierce
Says the Eagle pilot with a year or less invested. Why are you flying the planes? You seem destined for management.
Well, her airline is one renowned for having the most "oldest" pilots of all, now that Comair has melted. Seems to me, she's making a case for her own demise.

Being a fresh young cart hitched to a team of old, broken-down, swayback nags economically destined for the glue factory is no place to be in the desperate streets of Merger City.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CrustyFE
Regional
46
04-02-2011 08:23 PM
RJ Pilot
Regional
82
01-12-2010 06:39 AM
bgmann
Regional
165
10-09-2009 05:59 PM
rlkrutenat
Regional
6
08-01-2008 10:59 AM
CRJammin
Regional
21
09-02-2007 07:11 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices