Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > PSA Airlines
PDT/ EAGLE/ PSA's role at the new AA >

PDT/ EAGLE/ PSA's role at the new AA

Search

Notices
PSA Airlines Regional Airline

PDT/ EAGLE/ PSA's role at the new AA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-25-2012 | 07:15 AM
  #61  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by seafeye
TWU is playing both sides. They have to do everything in their power to save jobs. Whoever makes the better lie will get their support.
It won't be till late May before a contract proposal is put forth, so not sure if a vote could even take place before Lane rules on termination.

Getting it to pass is still a tall order as many who perceive themselves above the job cut line either way, may not bite on AMR's rotten apple.
Reply
Old 04-25-2012 | 07:41 AM
  #62  
Moonwolf's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,063
Likes: 10
From: Sleeping
Default

Originally Posted by amcwilli
Yes, but that was prior to AA becoming the apple of US's eye. IF we merge, I'll bet the Express brand is renamed American Eagle. It's a well known name, synonymous with American Airlines. Does that mean all 3 certificates will be combined? I dunno.

I don't think Airways intends to disperse of the wholly owneds all together. Of course I don't know, but I do know...

A) Airways has two of them.
B) There's been no explicit talk of doing away with us from Tempe
C) We've not seen a precipitous drawdown like Comair.
Geezz...American Eagle a well known name.. I want what your smoking... Regional airlines are the ghosts of major airlines. "what airline do you work for?" .....uhh...insert regional____...

.."hmm. never heard of it"....we do work for AA/UAL/US/DALetc ... ."Ohhhh thats cool"


Everybody is speculating on whats going to happen, who cares. Were not in control. Some will probably lose their job, and for some nothing will change. I never want to see a pilot lose their job... unless its go-jets/mesa or something like that.
Bottom line is what ever happens, regionals need to stop bending over and taking ****ty contracts. Business is about making a return on investment, making money and drinking beer. Period.
Reply
Old 04-25-2012 | 07:56 AM
  #63  
New Hire
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: EMB 170/190
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Consolidation in the industry continues, and it's occurring at the regional level as well. If AA & UsAir do merge, I'm not sure AA will be able to maintain PHX & DFW as hubs, especially with SWA having such a strong presence in PHX. PHL will likely see the same fate as PIT. Why would AA need it? I don't see much room for growth with a merger. Mergers tend to do the opposite. They consolidate, shrink, and trim the fat. I see AA's BK as a chance to shed E135/145's. It's likely AA pilots will hold on to anything below 76 seats, so I can't see a lot of room for feeder expansion.
Consolidation is exactly right. Who will go where and who wins or loses is the question.
Reply
Old 04-25-2012 | 08:03 AM
  #64  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Moonwolf
Geezz...American Eagle a well known name.. I want what your smoking... Regional airlines are the ghosts of major airlines. "what airline do you work for?" .....uhh...insert regional____...

.."hmm. never heard of it"....we do work for AA/UAL/US/DALetc ... ."Ohhhh thats cool"


Everybody is speculating on whats going to happen, who cares. Were not in control. Some will probably lose their job, and for some nothing will change. I never want to see a pilot lose their job... unless its go-jets/mesa or something like that.
Bottom line is what ever happens, regionals need to stop bending over and taking ****ty contracts. Business is about making a return on investment, making money and drinking beer. Period.
The only certainty is that ALL pilots involved will suffer. The only winners are the executives and the crony system they support. 5-7 years from now, this is going to be one nasty looking career for most. As it stands now, the average major airline captain is middle-middle class and will be lucky to actually see half of their pensions.

Those who are working at one day becoming a major airline captain will be lucky to make as much as a good plumber, HVAC guy or retail store manager. In today's dollars, that's $100K/year and a run-of-the-mill 401(k). Actually as large RJ's proliferate (and they will), the majority of pilots today will go no farther then a domestic E-190 captain getting their arses kicked for less then that.

The downward slide continues and some THINK they will be the winners (and they WILL in the short-term), but eventually they will end up the losers too, in the long-run.
Reply
Old 04-25-2012 | 08:13 AM
  #65  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by dav8or
Consolidation is exactly right. Who will go where and who wins or loses is the question.
U and AA WILL merge and you're right, how many seats and who gets them when the music stops is a major question. On the mainline side, at least there's hope due to retirements. The combined entity will have about 1800 retirements in the next 5 years or so, due to age 65, but certainly more including early-out's and medicals. I'd guess 2200 or so. That MAY negate the requirement for less pilots and furloughing due to more efficient scheduling, but leaves little room for growth and thus hiring.

The regional side is different, in that age 65 attrition from the top is negligable and there are 6000 pilots and 600 regional aircraft between the AA and U networks as it stands now. At least half of those are 50-seat RJ's, many of which will be replaced with larger RJ's, but consolidation and streamling will likely require a smaller feed system. Some markets won't support 76-seat jets (or even turboprops) with minimum required frequency and thus will be abandoned.

Not sure how many aircraft (and pilots) are in the combined UAL/CAL and DAL/NWA networks, but I don't think it's 600. Sounds like those operations are already into their streamlining and reduction process though.
Reply
Old 04-25-2012 | 08:38 AM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
From: DHC-8 FO
Default

Ok so what is the opinion of a merged PDT/PSA/AE joining? I know that this probably won't happen and the odd man out will be PDT but what would a PSA/AE merged airline look like. I know a lot of markets in the NE that PDT/AWAC/PSA serve can barley fill 3 dash's a day but there are some markets that could fill -300's and Q's pretty consistently. So while everyone has been saying 50seat RJ's are on the way out what is there going to be to replace them on some of these routes in the NE? They could run -700 to some of them but some places they would be weight restricted and then you would also have to cut freq's.
Reply
Old 04-25-2012 | 09:12 AM
  #67  
3Wisemen's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Vertisch
Unfortunately in this industry the wholly-onwed aren't viewed as loving children. Its more like the fat kid that is costing them too much. I agree there should be some benefit to being owned by the carrier, but in the end the flying is just going to go to who can do it for two cents cheaper. Just look at Comair.
Amen brother...let's not forget how bad the J4J's were treated...correct me if I am wrong but isn't PDT & PSA the only two remaining wholly owned regionals? AE was, but no longer? Not good to be the redheaded stepchild at the regional level. Riding only daddy for distribution of routes and not able to contract yourself out like others. Any day daddy can say bye-bye...Air-Whiskey is around because they helped to bail out Airways back in the day...what a nice thing to do...it's never about the pilots, their feelings or families...in any occupation if you wear a suit you are working for "the man". It's cost savings and productivity...management always wins. Question is, where do you stand in the matrix.
Reply
Old 04-25-2012 | 11:16 AM
  #68  
Thread Starter
New Hire
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Default

[QUOTE=Moonwolf;1175498]Geezz...American Eagle a well known name.. I want what your smoking... Regional airlines are the ghosts of major airlines. "what airline do you work for?" .....uhh...insert regional____...

.."hmm. never heard of it"....we do work for AA/UAL/US/DALetc ... ."Ohhhh thats cool"


Correct. To John and Jane Doe, bringing Johnny and Janey Jr to see Grandma and Grandpa Doe, the name American Eagle means nothing. However, to the people who make up the frequent flying elite at AA, American Eagle is well known...more so than the names Air Wisconsin, Republic, Mesa, etc. Which is the point I was making. If both carriers merge, I think all contracted carriers would fall under the Eagle name. Much in the same way all US's wholly owneds and contracts operate as US Airways Express.
Reply
Old 04-25-2012 | 11:47 AM
  #69  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by 3Wisemen
Amen brother...let's not forget how bad the J4J's were treated...correct me if I am wrong but isn't PDT & PSA the only two remaining wholly owned regionals? AE was, but no longer? Not good to be the redheaded stepchild at the regional level. Riding only daddy for distribution of routes and not able to contract yourself out like others. Any day daddy can say bye-bye...Air-Whiskey is around because they helped to bail out Airways back in the day...what a nice thing to do...it's never about the pilots, their feelings or families...in any occupation if you wear a suit you are working for "the man". It's cost savings and productivity...management always wins. Question is, where do you stand in the matrix.
I think AMR still owns AE. Also, Delta still owns Comair. Although Comair has been dramatically reduced.
Reply
Old 04-25-2012 | 12:24 PM
  #70  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Default

AMR owns Eagle, which owns AA as well. So Eagle is wholly owned by AMR
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CrustyFE
Regional
46
04-02-2011 08:23 PM
RJ Pilot
Regional
82
01-12-2010 06:39 AM
bgmann
Regional
165
10-09-2009 05:59 PM
rlkrutenat
Regional
6
08-01-2008 10:59 AM
CRJammin
Regional
21
09-02-2007 07:11 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices