Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > PSA Airlines
PSA 1st to hire street Capt. who's next? >

PSA 1st to hire street Capt. who's next?

Search

Notices
PSA Airlines Regional Airline

PSA 1st to hire street Capt. who's next?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-08-2015 | 05:07 AM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Default

What would be a good projected upgrade time for a new hire with no 121 time coming in after all these street captains are hired?
Reply
Old 06-08-2015 | 05:16 AM
  #62  
Slick111's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 749
Likes: 0
Default Follow the logic.

Let's follow the logic that RyanP is trying to drop on us. He'd have us believe that a good number of envoy new hires that are failing their oral or type ride are simply moving on to PSA or Mesa, ........the very next day, (which of course is preposterous, given the fact that it'll take weeks from the date of application to the date of interview, alone).

What that tells me is that ENVOY is an airline with low hiring standards! Following Ryan's logic, envoy is really scraping the bottom of the barrel and hiring pilots who are not able to pass their initial 121 training.

Of course, the truth of the matter is that envoy probably IS scraping the bottom of the barrel in order to find new first officer candidates,....... just like every regional airline. The big difference right now is that PSA is offering immediate captain opportunities to experienced first officers at other airlines who clearly have no hope of upgrading at their respective airlines in the foreseeable future.
Reply
Old 06-08-2015 | 05:17 AM
  #63  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,137
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by kls81
What would be a good projected upgrade time for a new hire with no 121 time coming in after all these street captains are hired?
Well to date there are only 7 street captains that I am aware of.

It's going to take you probably 1.5 years to acquire the needed 121 time as FO before upgrading.

There are 70 more airplanes coming over the next two years, there will be plenty of opportunity to be a captain very quickly here at PSA. If you are looking to do some math, figure at a minimum each airplane is staffed with 10.5 pilots (or more if you include instructors etc.. on the seniority list).
Reply
Old 06-08-2015 | 05:22 AM
  #64  
Slick111's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 749
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by kls81
What would be a good projected upgrade time for a new hire with no 121 time coming in after all these street captains are hired?
Well, given the fact that PSA is only 1/2 way to their stated expectation of having 150 airplanes by the end of 2017, I'd guess that the upgrade time for today's new (to 121) hire is probably in the 2 - 3 year range.

So what is the upgrade time for that same new (to 121) hire at envoy, ASA, SkyWest, Mesa, RAH, or others?
Reply
Old 06-08-2015 | 05:35 AM
  #65  
seafeye's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 0
From: Hot tub for now
Default

2-3 years upgrade.
25 year flow

ALPA has failed miserably and its time we end their service.
Reply
Old 06-08-2015 | 05:39 AM
  #66  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,137
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by seafeye
2-3 years upgrade.
25 year flow

ALPA has failed miserably and its time we end their service.
I wouldn't worry about flow, its meaningless. In five years you won't even care.
Reply
Old 06-08-2015 | 05:41 AM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Default

Great, Thank you for the responses.
Reply
Old 06-08-2015 | 05:56 AM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Slick111
Well, given the fact that PSA is only 1/2 way to their stated expectation of having 150 airplanes by the end of 2017, I'd guess that the upgrade time for today's new (to 121) hire is probably in the 2 - 3 year range.

So what is the upgrade time for that same new (to 121) hire at envoy, ASA, SkyWest, Mesa, RAH, or others?
Wouldn't shock me if it were not that much longer at some other places in the not too distant future once major hiring really picks up.
Reply
Old 06-08-2015 | 06:12 AM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,244
Likes: 0
Default

I think at that point you'd see a problem in attracting new hires as there already is. Imagine xjt, Skywest, republic, envoy, PSA and all other regional carriers FO's upgrading in 2-3 years from now. It'll be hard for them to attract new hires to replace those positions. It'll be like this at every regional except for the ones that are dying off and shrinking.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 06-08-2015 | 06:30 AM
  #70  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,137
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by JohnnyDingus
I think at that point you'd see a problem in attracting new hires as there already is. Imagine xjt, Skywest, republic, envoy, PSA and all other regional carriers FO's upgrading in 2-3 years from now. It'll be hard for them to attract new hires to replace those positions. It'll be like this at every regional except for the ones that are dying off and shrinking.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I hate to say it, but I think wholly owned carriers may unfortunately become a new rung on the career ladder in the future. I only say that because I feel that non-wholly owned regional airlines will be the first to fail because without the support of the parent airline, its hard for them to compete for new hire pilots. Don't get me wrong, I think one way or the other they will all eventually fail, but wholly owneds may be the last to fail.

Of course non wholly owneds such as Republic or Skywest could turn in to competition or some form of aircraft leasing company. Someone on this forum proposed an interesting theory where mainline pilots could fly smaller aircraft owned by third parties.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Priority 3
Cargo
11
08-02-2015 08:56 AM
TeddyKGB
Foreign
82
07-15-2013 08:22 AM
PEACH
Major
90
08-20-2009 05:01 PM
Nashmd11
Cargo
48
03-17-2007 11:53 AM
JetJock16
Regional
14
02-23-2007 06:39 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices