Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Time requirements??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-01-2007, 12:46 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,545
Default

Why does the FAA impose hiring minimums on Part 135 IFR but not on Part 121?? Having ATP minimums for any pilot of a 121 carrier would do wonders for regional pay. When companies like Skywest, ExpressJet, Comair, Eagle Republic, etc... need to hire thousandsS of pilots, they could not lower minimums any lower than ATP. They would need to think of more creative ways of attracting pilots (raise pay, raise QOL, more out and back lines, whatever....)

I would be happy if the FAA imposed ATP minimums for any pilot of a 121 carrier.
iahflyr is offline  
Old 03-01-2007, 01:19 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
surfnfly's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: EMB
Posts: 128
Default

Originally Posted by iahflyr View Post
Why does the FAA impose hiring minimums on Part 135 IFR but not on Part 121?? Having ATP minimums for any pilot of a 121 carrier would do wonders for regional pay. When companies like Skywest, ExpressJet, Comair, Eagle Republic, etc... need to hire thousandsS of pilots, they could not lower minimums any lower than ATP. They would need to think of more creative ways of attracting pilots (raise pay, raise QOL, more out and back lines, whatever....)

I would be happy if the FAA imposed ATP minimums for any pilot of a 121 carrier.
Since when are there minimums to sit right seat 135
surfnfly is offline  
Old 03-01-2007, 01:25 PM
  #13  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: CFI
Posts: 19
Default

lighter-than-air hours count toward ATP, so it is possible to have 500 hours fixed wing with a multi-engine ATP....
osucowboy1 is offline  
Old 03-01-2007, 02:09 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
shanejj's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: B737, On Top
Posts: 433
Default

Originally Posted by surfnfly View Post
Since when are there minimums to sit right seat 135
well...as far as I know there aren't, except for the ratings and cert.
But, if the a/c is required to have a two man crew...does the SIC have to be rated in the a/c? It would make sense though
shanejj is offline  
Old 03-01-2007, 02:12 PM
  #15  
Cloudbase
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 717A
Posts: 532
Default

Originally Posted by cruiseclimb View Post
I hate to say it, but this is the beginning of the end. I can see some kid sitting there with 600 hours in the cockpit sharing his "there I was" stories.... Wait, they do that now. Never mind..

I agree Rick, an ATP is priceless.. When I started this back in the 80s, the mins to apply to a commuter was 1,500 with 500 ME.
600 hours is a lot different than 200. I'm not saying I'm "deserving of a jet" or anything, but I just cleared 600 hours last month and I've been instructing in one way or another for a year and a half now, and I know I'm a heck of a lot more capable than a 200 hour pilot. Granted some of that comes from flying last semester in a Cessna 404, but we still went to places such as Atlanta and O'Hare with it. I know I'm going to get my head bitten off for this, but seriously folks. What is the point of complaining about young or inexperienced pilots when it's the future whether we like it or not? Yeah times used to be different. So what? I'm guessing some of you complaining about "when I was your age" issues flew civillian. Well guess what? There was a time too when military guys worried about all those crazy civillian pilots coming up the ranks.

Sooner or later, you're going to have a young and inexperienced FO in the cockpit sitting next to you. What are you going to do? Harass him for being stupid? Or make a difference? If he's having problems, try to help him out instead of belittling him. It's like complaining about someone in a political office when you don't vote. Moral of this story is when you get down to it, stop complaining, accept the fact that there really is a shortage of pilots in training while the industry needs more. Accept the fact that the jet jocks get younger and younger and their logbooks are getting thinner and thinner every day. And yes I too am not a big fan of the ATP schools, and the 90 day wonder flight schools, but hey, don't crap on the guys who are training in a legit fashion, and just happen to be what the airlines are looking for. Seriously. What do you guys propose they do? Not apply until they've instructed for 2000 hours and no longer enjoy the career field we are all sworn to?

Once again, I'm not trying to tick people off, I'm just trying to shed some logic on this.

By the way, I too am a student at MTSU, as well as an instrctor for the flight school.
GliderCFI is offline  
Old 03-01-2007, 02:29 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
par8head's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 362
Default

Originally Posted by surfnfly View Post
I'll think I'll start sending the wife and kids on amtrak

HAHAHA.....
par8head is offline  
Old 03-01-2007, 04:13 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
shanejj's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: B737, On Top
Posts: 433
Default

I honestly don't think that pilots should be judged by the amount of hours you got...
Unless ofcourse ur >5K
Some ppl just have it in them....like a 25hr student pilot thats ready for checkride....compared to some guys that need 75hrs...
thats 3 times as much.....
So someone with 400hrs...could be as good, if not, have better skill than someone with 1200hrs?
Hmm....Think it has more to do with WHAT and WHO you know.....not just stick and rudder
shanejj is offline  
Old 03-01-2007, 04:18 PM
  #18  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 18
Default

I read only three sentences of gliders post and have already decided he is a DORK !
jlhenderson70 is offline  
Old 03-01-2007, 04:19 PM
  #19  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 18
Default

read the last line of his post yes he certainly a DORK.
jlhenderson70 is offline  
Old 03-01-2007, 04:44 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Flight Instructor
Posts: 623
Default

Originally Posted by iahflyr View Post
Why does the FAA impose hiring minimums on Part 135 IFR but not on Part 121?? Having ATP minimums for any pilot of a 121 carrier would do wonders for regional pay. When companies like Skywest, ExpressJet, Comair, Eagle Republic, etc... need to hire thousandsS of pilots, they could not lower minimums any lower than ATP. They would need to think of more creative ways of attracting pilots (raise pay, raise QOL, more out and back lines, whatever....)

I would be happy if the FAA imposed ATP minimums for any pilot of a 121 carrier.
A part 135 cargo pilot is flying by himself in hard IMC on many occasions. He needs to be experienced. an airline FO has a 2000 hour ATP sitting next to him that can watch and monitor him Thats whay I think
N6724G is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
captain_drew
Flight Schools and Training
38
12-05-2012 08:29 AM
Islandhopper
Hiring News
22
08-05-2007 06:36 PM
pilotrod
Corporate
18
01-11-2007 05:19 AM
Islandhopper
Major
17
09-21-2006 07:32 AM
Islandhopper
Regional
19
09-19-2006 03:16 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices