Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Time requirements??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-02-2007 | 09:01 AM
  #41  
Ftrooppilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,349
Likes: 0
From: Body at sea level; heart at 70,000+
Default

Originally Posted by jlhenderson70
What the heck is a 404 ? no pics of it on Airliners.net
Picture attached.
Cessna 404 - Cargo
  • Cruising Speed: 212 mph
  • 48" x 48" Cargo Door
  • Cargo Capacity: 2200 lb
Reply
Old 03-02-2007 | 09:17 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 639
Likes: 0
From: SAABster
Default

Originally Posted by Ftrooppilot
Ever been asked, "How old would you think you are if you didn't know how old you are ?"

or

It isn't what we don't know that will hurt us. It's what we don't know that we don't know that will hurt us.

Young aspiring pilots need mentoring. Take care of that FO who might be your Captain some day.
I love this!!!! Ya, in this biz you never know who's gonna' be your boss (or a connection to your next flying job)!!
Reply
Old 03-02-2007 | 09:52 AM
  #43  
texaspilot76's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 0
From: Right Seat
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Some of the regionals may hiring at the wet commercial level, but I can guarantee you that Delta is not Off the street competetive for DAL is probably something like 10,000 hours, 6,000+ Jet PIC.

Most of us aren't really happy about it...there's a lot to be learned by spending 1000-1500 hours in general aviation/135. Personally I think any 121 pilot should hold an ATP.
I have to disagree for several reasons. One, times have changed. When there is a shortage of applicants, you have to adjust hiring practices. Second, a pilot's flight time is not always a good indicator of their skill. I am an instructor and have instructed individuals with thousands of hours of time, and in some cases a student pilot could fly better than them.
Last, hiring and promotions should be done by qualifications. In addition to flight time, a college degree, veteran status, work experience, etc., is just as important as flight time in considering an applicant. Personally, if I were the hiring manager, I would take an instructor with 600 hours that has a college degree over someone with no education and 2000 hours.
Reply
Old 03-02-2007 | 10:02 AM
  #44  
RedeyeAV8r's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by texaspilot76
I were the hiring manager, I would take an instructor with 600 hours that has a college degree over someone with no education and 2000 hours.
I 'd give the Furloughed Pilots first shot, and other Pilots with 121 experience and Airline type ratings.

At 600 hours, one hasn't even had time to get wet behind the ears and Unless you are coming from the Military, 2000 hours ain't much to brag about either.
Reply
Old 03-02-2007 | 10:08 AM
  #45  
New Hire
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Default

As I do see where you guys are coming from, and yes, 200 hours is a small amount, but I'm sure as you know, these times are different. It takes about 6-8 years to try to make it to a major carrier. So thats really 6-8 years of making barely enough money to support yourself, and/or family. Nowadays pilot pay is low regardless, due to the price of tickets. Atleast regionals are giving us a chance to build up and move on.
Reply
Old 03-02-2007 | 10:38 AM
  #46  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
From: Q200 FO
Default

Shouldn't it be kept in mind that the pilots (high or low time ones) aren't the ppl posting the low hiring times??? it's the airlines. They wouldn't be hiring at these times if they didn't feel they could sufficiently train the pilots. Even if the airlines do post low times, thats no guarantee that the pilot is getting hired/through training.

Bottom line is: aviation is a business, airlines are going to do whatever they can to keep the costs down, even if that means hiring the low time pilots who will fly for nonexistant pay and QOL. I'm not economics afficiando, but its simple cost/benefit and risk/reward analyses.

I don't think there are many career-minded pilots out there who wouldn't take advantage of the lower hiring times, I'd be lying if i said i wasn't going to. It may not be right, but that seems the nature of our business, the sooner you get hired, the better. If you don't take that job, someone else will. Its sad but for most of us, the price of noblity & the moral high ground is just too steep.

Anyway, I just think we shouldn't be attacking each other over the decisions we aren't making.

Personally I think that more often than not, flight time is an accurate measure of our skills, however there are always exceptions. IMHO, if someone came out of a 141 paper mill as a "good" pilot, that probably would've happened anyway, and not everyone coming from the part61 schools is automatically entitled to the airline seat. It all depends on the pilot.

-----------------

Just so i don't get flamed too bad: I've been flying for 10yrs through high school & college (not aeronautical sci major) & CFI'ing for the last 1.5 yrs. I considered ERAU when I was a senior in h.s. but i'm glad i ultimately took the route I did and i feel i'm a better pilot because of it. I have no airline experience (yet ) so you guys already with the seats know better than i do, this is just the logic i've made of the whole situation.
Reply
Old 03-02-2007 | 12:28 PM
  #47  
Ftrooppilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,349
Likes: 0
From: Body at sea level; heart at 70,000+
Default

Originally Posted by 4N1flyr
Its sad but for most of us, the price of noblity & the moral high ground is just too steep. . . . Anyway, I just think we shouldn't be attacking each other over the decisions we aren't making.
. . . Personally I think that more often than not, flight time is an accurate measure of our skills, however there are always exceptions. . . . .It all depends on the pilot..
One of the best (and most logical) posts I have read. Thanks.
Reply
Old 03-02-2007 | 05:21 PM
  #48  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,127
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by iahflyr
Why does the FAA impose hiring minimums on Part 135 IFR but not on Part 121??
The FAA requirements for 121 and 135 SIC are a commercial ticket.

Many 135 operators operate ASEL and AMEL (often turbine AMEL). The AMEL time is more desireable and pays better (especially turbine), and seniority determines who flys what. For this reason 135 new hires go into ASEL which are usually single-pilot...hence many 135 new-hires have to meet 135 PIC requirements. 121 operators usually hire for SIC only.
Reply
Old 03-02-2007 | 09:27 PM
  #49  
shanejj's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
From: B737, On Top
Default

Originally Posted by flyingchris86
As I do see where you guys are coming from, and yes, 200 hours is a small amount, but I'm sure as you know, these times are different. It takes about 6-8 years to try to make it to a major carrier. So thats really 6-8 years of making barely enough money to support yourself, and/or family. Nowadays pilot pay is low regardless, due to the price of tickets. Atleast regionals are giving us a chance to build up and move on.

And a reason being that the regionals hire us low timers is because we're the ones that will do it for less....the ones that wanted MORE $$ for their jobs were the ones that arent there anymore (perhaps moved on to majors/corporate)...so dont be mad at us youngsters trying to get in the cockpit of an rj. It's in fact partly YOUR fault that we're eligible to fly the plane your wife and kids are on
Reply
Old 03-02-2007 | 10:40 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
From: 737 Left
Default

Originally Posted by shanejj
And a reason being that the regionals hire us low timers is because we're the ones that will do it for less....the ones that wanted MORE $$ for their jobs were the ones that arent there anymore (perhaps moved on to majors/corporate)...so dont be mad at us youngsters trying to get in the cockpit of an rj. It's in fact partly YOUR fault that we're eligible to fly the plane your wife and kids are on
That is a stupid post and directly reflects your immaturity. You're 18? I wouldn't let you fly my bags around in a 172, let alone an EFFING regional jet.

Another reason why a degree should be required...to keep teenagers out of jet cockpits.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
captain_drew
Flight Schools and Training
39
12-05-2012 08:29 AM
Islandhopper
Hiring News
22
08-05-2007 06:36 PM
pilotrod
Corporate
18
01-11-2007 05:19 AM
Islandhopper
Major
17
09-21-2006 07:32 AM
Islandhopper
Regional
19
09-19-2006 03:16 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices