Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
[Will congress repeal the 1500 hour rule?] >

[Will congress repeal the 1500 hour rule?]

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

[Will congress repeal the 1500 hour rule?]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-08-2017, 09:09 AM
  #161  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 846
Default [Will congress repeal the 1500 hour rule?]

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer View Post
Correlation does not equal causation

The law which required pilots to have an ATP did more than just that. It required the FAA to come up with scientifically based flight time and duty limits. It also required airlines to conduct ground and flight upset and stall recovery training. It also required the FAA and air carriers to establish records databases. It then required any airline to check and consider those databases in their hiring practices. And it also required air carriers to implement a Safety Management System.

All these things touch on the things that caused the accident: airmanship in upset/stall recovery, fatigue, pilots' past performance, safety culture, and lastly, compensation in order to make a livable wage and being able to afford a hotel instead of commuting on a red-eye or sleeping in the crew room.

Anyone would have a hard case to show the "ATP law" hasn't contributed to safety, especially the increase in compensation the ATP has caused.
Nevjets is offline  
Old 07-08-2017, 12:58 PM
  #162  
Gets Weekends Off
 
tomgoodman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: 767A (Ret)
Posts: 6,248
Default

Originally Posted by Hacker15e View Post
Obviously, pirates are endothermic.
tomgoodman is offline  
Old 07-08-2017, 10:33 PM
  #163  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SonicFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 3,596
Default

Originally Posted by Nevjets View Post
The law which required pilots to have an ATP did more than just that. It required the FAA to come up with scientifically based flight time
LOL ha ha ha! If you believe that, then Al Gore has some carbon credits to sell you....The number "1500" is completely arbitrary. This particular rule was 100% political.



Originally Posted by Nevjets View Post
compensation in order to make a livable wage and being able to afford a hotel instead of commuting on a red-eye or sleeping in the crew room.

Anyone would have a hard case to show the "ATP law" hasn't contributed to safety, especially the increase in compensation the ATP has caused.
Uh there was going to be a shortage anyway causing wages to increase simply because of supply and demand. This rule only made it happen a couple of years earlier.


You are stretching, grasping at straws.
SonicFlyer is offline  
Old 07-09-2017, 03:34 AM
  #164  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,022
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer View Post
LOL ha ha ha! If you believe that, then Al Gore has some carbon credits to sell you....The number "1500" is completely arbitrary. This particular rule was 100% political.







Uh there was going to be a shortage anyway causing wages to increase simply because of supply and demand. This rule only made it happen a couple of years earlier.





You are stretching, grasping at straws.


How is 1500 arbitrary? The law required all pilots not just Captains to have the highest level of certification and a full aircraft type.

1500 hours was the starting point for min requirements and then credit has been given for that time for the manner in which one's training was received in order to get a restricted ATP. 1500 has always been the requirement for an ATP certificate.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
4V14T0R is offline  
Old 07-09-2017, 06:59 AM
  #165  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NFjt's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Posts: 222
Default

What kind of a hole title is that?!!
NFjt is offline  
Old 07-09-2017, 07:11 PM
  #166  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 194
Default

This is what's needed. 250hr. Commercial pilot to major airline pilot.

Omnipotent is offline  
Old 07-10-2017, 07:21 AM
  #167  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 571
Default

Originally Posted by tomgoodman View Post
Obviously, pirates are endothermic.
If temperatures are rising in relation to the number of pirates, wouldn't that mean pirates are exothermic?
Rahlifer is offline  
Old 07-10-2017, 07:56 AM
  #168  
Gets Weekends Off
 
tomgoodman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: 767A (Ret)
Posts: 6,248
Default

Originally Posted by Rahlifer View Post
If temperatures are rising in relation to the number of pirates, wouldn't that mean pirates are exothermic?
Correct, but the chart shows that temperatures are rising as the number of pirates decreases. Apparently, global warming was caused by the Royal Navy.
tomgoodman is offline  
Old 07-10-2017, 03:16 PM
  #169  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Posts: 846
Default [Will congress repeal the 1500 hour rule?]

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer View Post
LOL ha ha ha! If you believe that, then Al Gore has some carbon credits to sell you....The number "1500" is completely arbitrary. This particular rule was 100% political.







Uh there was going to be a shortage anyway causing wages to increase simply because of supply and demand. This rule only made it happen a couple of years earlier.





You are stretching, grasping at straws.


The duty and flight time limitations were science based. I don't know why you think that is funny.

Like I said, the law that required and ATP had more than that in it. And all of them are hard to argue did not incrementally increase safety. Also,even if the supposed pilot shortage was coming no matter what, it doesn't negate what I said about livable wage.

There is no pilot shortage. There is a pay shortage.

Lastly, if 1500 hours are arbitrary, so are all the other hour requirements in part 61. Why don't people advocate getting rid of ALL hour requirements in ALL training requirements if they are all arbitrary?
Nevjets is offline  
Old 07-10-2017, 07:59 PM
  #170  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SonicFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 3,596
Default

Originally Posted by Nevjets View Post
The duty and flight time limitations were science based.
Nice attempt at trying to change the subject. I was referring to the 1500 hour rule, not duty day and flight time regs.



Originally Posted by Nevjets View Post
There is no pilot shortage. There is a pay shortage.
Seriously, these union talking points are old and worn out. Can you not think for yourself?

Originally Posted by Nevjets View Post
Lastly, if 1500 hours are arbitrary, so are all the other hour requirements in part 61. Why don't people advocate getting rid of ALL hour requirements in ALL training requirements if they are all arbitrary?
There could be an argument made for pure proficiency, but tens of millions of people a year were moved by regionals without incident prior to the 1500 hour rule. The change was not needed and was nothing more than a political gift.
SonicFlyer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PearlPilot
Flight Schools and Training
118
02-03-2014 10:11 AM
Naven
Cargo
26
02-14-2013 10:49 AM
172 Captain
Regional
35
12-14-2012 08:30 AM
vandypilot
Safety
147
01-08-2012 04:11 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices