![]() |
Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
(Post 3103033)
If it is the same union for both XJT and UAL, then why did they let UAL get away with this?
|
Originally Posted by Tom Bradys Cat
(Post 3103090)
pretty sure cause it isnt....its alpA.....its an association of seperate unions.
XJT union.....United union......both under an association. AFAIK |
Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
(Post 3103033)
If it is the same union for both XJT and UAL, then why did they let UAL get away with this?
|
Originally Posted by OOfff
(Post 3103261)
what should ALPA have done, in your opinion?
|
At the end of the day ALPA is a labor union that is going to bargain for the Interests or mainline pilots and only mainline jobs. Years ago working EMS,I was the member of a large international union which represented firefighters. My agency did transports only and had no fire suppression capabilities. While it was nice having the resources of a large international labor group, they were also very open about putting us in our place and pushing to bring EMS transport under the umbrella of fire suppression duties and thus putting us out of work.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
Originally Posted by Av8rPHX
(Post 3103333)
At the end of the day ALPA is a labor union that is going to bargain for the Interests or mainline pilots and only mainline jobs. Years ago working EMS,I was the member of a large international union which represented firefighters. My agency did transports only and had no fire suppression capabilities. While it was nice having the resources of a large international labor group, they were also very open about putting us in our place and pushing to bring EMS transport under the umbrella of fire suppression duties and thus putting us out of work.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
Originally Posted by Dstblj52
(Post 3103384)
Hard to blame them its basically impossible to make things better at the regionals due to the nature of bidding for business far better to try and shrink them so mainline and the LLC can grow in their place
|
Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
(Post 3103033)
If it is the same union for both XJT and UAL, then why did they let UAL get away with this?
It’s not the same union. The pilots who are on the XJT MEC are not the same pilots who are on the UAL mec. ALPA is an association of several unions. That’s what the second A in ALPA stands for. But I’m pretty sure you already knew that and your line of questions has a specific agenda. Why not just come out and say it? It’s okay. |
Originally Posted by Av8rPHX
(Post 3103333)
At the end of the day ALPA is a labor union that is going to bargain for the Interests or mainline pilots and only mainline jobs. Years ago working EMS,I was the member of a large international union which represented firefighters. My agency did transports only and had no fire suppression capabilities. While it was nice having the resources of a large international labor group, they were also very open about putting us in our place and pushing to bring EMS transport under the umbrella of fire suppression duties and thus putting us out of work.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro Only an airline pilot’s respective MEC can negotiate their own contract. They are not able to negotiate another pilot group’s contract. They have no say in it. So of course each MEC is going to negotiate what is solely in their own interest. So yes, mainline pilots will always negotiate in their own interest and regional pilots will negotiate their own interest. Neither has a say in the other. |
Originally Posted by FXLAX
(Post 3103491)
It’s not the same union. The pilots who are on the XJT MEC are not the same pilots who are on the UAL mec. ALPA is an association of several unions. That’s what the second A in ALPA stands for. But I’m pretty sure you already knew that and your line of questions has a specific agenda. Why not just come out and say it? It’s okay.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:48 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands