Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

PDT News and Rumors

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-07-2010, 03:30 PM
  #1581  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BSOuthisplace's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Position: N/A
Posts: 637
Default

So, what do you all think about the UAL-Airways merger talks? What would that mean for PDT if it actually happened?
BSOuthisplace is offline  
Old 04-07-2010, 04:22 PM
  #1582  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 936
Default

First time I heard of that one. Where did you see/hear this?
dashtrash300 is offline  
Old 04-07-2010, 05:01 PM
  #1583  
Gets Weekends Off
 
rocketman3746's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 253
Default

Originally Posted by dashtrash300 View Post
First time I heard of that one. Where did you see/hear this?

Here, for one:
http://www.airlinepilotforums.com/ma...ger-talks.html
rocketman3746 is offline  
Old 04-08-2010, 02:44 AM
  #1584  
Kerbal Rocket Surgeon
 
Phuz's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DTW 717A
Posts: 1,099
Default

Originally Posted by BSOuthisplace View Post
So, what do you all think about the UAL-Airways merger talks? What would that mean for PDT if it actually happened?
obviously this is all speculation at this point, but the ual dhc8b flying out of den still needs to be filled. mesa is not going to do it, and it seemed that pdt was having at least some difficulty making the case for only 6 phx aircraft. A ual merger scenario could result in pdt assuming both the ual and lcc dhc8b west flying, I believe it was 12-14 aircraft.
Phuz is offline  
Old 04-08-2010, 06:53 AM
  #1585  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: CL-65 / Gear Wrangler
Posts: 321
Default

Originally Posted by Phuz View Post
obviously this is all speculation at this point, but the ual dhc8b flying out of den still needs to be filled. mesa is not going to do it, and it seemed that pdt was having at least some difficulty making the case for only 6 phx aircraft. A ual merger scenario could result in pdt assuming both the ual and lcc dhc8b west flying, I believe it was 12-14 aircraft.
We weren't looking at just 6 a/c, but all of them. Fly the 6 for US in PHX, the rest become 1 for 1 replacements for our oldest 100s. No "RENEW" program for the 100s if we got the remaining 200s.
That was the plan that was talked about before Mesa's Ch. 11.
Piedmonster is offline  
Old 04-08-2010, 09:15 AM
  #1586  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Posts: 259
Default

Originally Posted by BSOuthisplace View Post
So, what do you all think about the UAL-Airways merger talks? What would that mean for PDT if it actually happened?

The last time US and UA were close to merging it would have meant the sale of PDT do to the UAL FA contract. It stipulated that all UAL FA's had to be on one seniority list. This may be something that they gave up in concessions durring chapter 11. It is also one of the resons that United does not have wholly owned regionals.

The question is why would anyone want to buy Piedmont? Out dated fleet combined with a senior work force does not make us atractive. Maybe sell PSA and if they call with in the next 5 minutes USair will throw in a free piedmont while suplys last.
porqueno is offline  
Old 04-08-2010, 09:32 AM
  #1587  
Kerbal Rocket Surgeon
 
Phuz's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DTW 717A
Posts: 1,099
Default

Originally Posted by Piedmonster View Post
We weren't looking at just 6 a/c, but all of them. Fly the 6 for US in PHX, the rest become 1 for 1 replacements for our oldest 100s. No "RENEW" program for the 100s if we got the remaining 200s.
That was the plan that was talked about before Mesa's Ch. 11.
i guess that depends on which of the dozen or so rumors on that subject you subscribe to, doesn't it?

either way, a uaua/lcc merge puts the old mesa dhc8b flying on the table for us, something which wasn't there before.
Phuz is offline  
Old 04-08-2010, 01:32 PM
  #1588  
Gets Weekends Off
 
flynwmn's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 517
Default

Has united's position changed on wholly owned carriers not on the seniority list?
flynwmn is offline  
Old 04-08-2010, 02:52 PM
  #1589  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2008
Posts: 1,114
Default

Originally Posted by flynwmn View Post
Has united's position changed on wholly owned carriers not on the seniority list?
Does not matter... USairways would be the one whom acquires UAL... Due to snapbacks... Thus wholly owns allowed...
meyers9163 is offline  
Old 04-09-2010, 11:07 AM
  #1590  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 936
Default

I heard that the permanent bid came out. Congrats to those who got what they wanted and for those who didn't hold in there.

I was doing some thinking which is a dangerous thing to do while on furlough. Why would the company come out with a permanent bid to be effective in May if they might do more recalls in May which would require another bid to be effective in June? What are the chances that this could mean no more recalls are planned? I just assume that they would have waited to move everyone around until they had everyone that they needed back. Is this a normal practice? I better stop thinking now. Beer time!

BTW, I heard that the CQ ground instructor quit
dashtrash300 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
aviator01
Horizon Air
47
06-24-2008 11:56 AM
triflyier
Cargo
28
05-02-2008 05:26 AM
tankerpuke
Cargo
2
09-23-2007 08:37 AM
Freighter Captain
Hiring News
3
05-16-2005 12:45 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices