PDT News and Rumors

Reply Subscribe

Page 414 of 1126

414

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

06-30-2013 | 10:17 AM

#4131

l1011

Line Holder

Joined: May 2009

Posts: 258

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by frmrdashtrash

You're really going to stick around there making 25-35K, get abused by scheduling, and work inefficient AM/PM shifts long term?

If you live in base I can see it. It's really not a bad place to work if that's the case. Lord help you trying to commute though.

They have no idea what they are getting in to, after a year of this BS they will be singing a different tune. The management at this place never ceases to amaze me, and not in a good way.

06-30-2013 | 10:23 AM

#4132

PDTpilotXX

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Jan 2011

Posts: 843

Likes: 0

From: DHC-8 100/300

Don't always agree with you L1011, but you're spot on.

07-02-2013 | 11:47 AM

#4133

theHub

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Sep 2009

Posts: 384

Likes: 0

From: Ask scheduling

I hear we are bidding on a -100. Ex military plane. Low cycles but older than 906.

07-02-2013 | 11:56 AM

#4134

Bozo the pilot

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: May 2013

Posts: 2,594

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by theHub

I hear we are bidding on a -100. Ex military plane. Low cycles but older than 906.

Yea- PDT has always been proactive...

07-02-2013 | 12:16 PM

#4135

skyxbomb

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Jun 2010

Posts: 781

Likes: 0

I thought PSA and PDT is merging :P why else would PSA change their flight numbers to 4000's when our current flight numbers doesn't really conflict with AE.

07-02-2013 | 12:34 PM

#4136

BSOuthisplace

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Sep 2009

Posts: 637

Likes: 0

From: N/A

http://gsaauctions.gov/gsaauctions/aucitsrh/#

07-02-2013 | 12:44 PM

#4137

NuGuy

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Mar 2008

Posts: 4,107

Likes: 103

Quote:

Originally Posted by BSOuthisplace

I don't know where all these cat II rumors are coming from but who cares? How often would we really use it? I can only think of a few times where it would have come in handy as only a handful of airports we operate in have functioning CAT II approaches.

On the other hand RNAV approach capability would be a huge benefit with our operation, but would require a major avionics overhaul.

FWIW everyone was getting CAT II qualified back in 1993. I think I've got my Piedmont CAT II manual sitting up in the closet somewhere.

Nu