PDT News and Rumors
#6031
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Position: Ball Turret Gunner
Posts: 297
LMAO Say what you want about Mesa but we have these cool things called EFB, i know crazy right? Right now a captain upgrade consistently of less than 14 months = 50k + a year pay, better bases, newer aircraft and going to be buying yet another airline in the near future. And 8+ year contracts with main line. Only con is first year pay but i digress. Also We have a lot of pdt guys coming over here. 3 other ones in the last two classes.
#6032
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Position: Ball Turret Gunner
Posts: 297
#6033
Good observation. Thats why I was asking the question. I am sure throwing jets on a certificate is a huge undertaking and yes I do not know the process however I do know that the 145/200 + current route structure + current fuel prices = mabe breaking even / no profit. When fuel = < $80 Per barrel = no profit. So is PDT going to restructure their routes?
#6034
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Position: Ball Turret Gunner
Posts: 297
The only pro to PDT is the highlight of my career so far is the first IOE ride where you get to sit in MM's lap for the whole flight while he tells you stories about turkish prisons and boys locker rooms. On the Final flair he runs his hands through your hair and whispers in your ear "regional jets real soon boy" while something hard is pressing in to your right thigh.
#6035
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Position: Ball Turret Gunner
Posts: 297
Yes. Initially there will be jet and Dash flying, so the jet will most likely do 1 hr to 1.5 hr trips out of some hub base (DCA and PHL are best bets) while the Dash continues its wind down. Strangely enough, many of the routes we operate also see 50 seat jets as well. If you can fill the jet on a route like PHL-ABE or CLT-GSP then it still makes sense. What we will probably see across the board is frequency reduction, which saves on cost and staffing.
#6037
#6038
Well when you put the sim into the dirt on engine failures, etc...there may not be help for you. Aside from that, if you study all year like a true professional then recurrent is a non-issue. For all the JP bashing, if you actually listen to some of his advice it is actually very helpful.
#6039
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Position: Ball Turret Gunner
Posts: 297
Well when you put the sim into the dirt on engine failures, etc...there may not be help for you. Aside from that, if you study all year like a true professional then recurrent is a non-issue. For all the JP bashing, if you actually listen to some of his advice it is actually very helpful.
#6040
Hello Piedmont guys and whoever else is reading this thread. I want to get some insight from you all about my situation. I'm previous 121 FO, coming back to the industry. I'm weighing Mesa vs Piedmont... weird comparison maybe but both interesting options for different reasons. Mesa of course has growth and lots of new large planes with a fairly secure near term future and quick upgrades. However, Piedmont has genuine straight flow-thru to American and only 400 pilots currently on property- I could expect to be at AA in 4 to 6 years. Also Piedmont is $28/hr first year plus a 5k bonus and upgrade times are 3 years and dropping. Piedmont does have some uncertainty in the lifespan of the dash 8's and the "recycled" 145's they are getting from Envoy. Would you all risk the dated and small capacity fleet at Piedmont for the flow, or go for the big rj's at mesa with no flow? Also, I do not have a college degree, so I'm worried that without a flow program I may have a more difficult time getting hired by a major on my own. Basing is no concern for me, I will move to my base at either. Thanks for any thoughts you guys might have.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post