Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Eagle News

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-24-2009 | 11:27 AM
  #321  
Da Magic's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Mason32
The 1500 included ALL costs associated with the flight... pro-rated rampers and gate agents included.

As a side note... and not to drift tooo far off topic... but,

I find it interesting to note that the typical ERJ top step Captain is getting between 90 and 105 per hour to fly a 35-50 seat jet.... that works out to at best over 2 dollars per seat.....

comparing that to mainline payscales.... I see that their Captains are getting around 1 dollar per seat.... so;

Who is it that is really bringing the industry down ?
sooooooooo what your saying is that i'm making (FO) 'on a per seat basis' the same as a legacy capt.

damn that just warms the soul but i still feel under paid
Reply
Old 07-24-2009 | 11:29 AM
  #322  
Flyby1206's Avatar
SDQ Base Chief
20 Years
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,079
Likes: 41
From: 320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Mason32
I find it interesting to note that the typical ERJ top step Captain is getting between 90 and 105 per hour to fly a 35-50 seat jet.... that works out to at best over 2 dollars per seat.....

comparing that to mainline payscales.... I see that their Captains are getting around 1 dollar per seat.... so;

Who is it that is really bringing the industry down ?
Its really hard to find a fair way to calculate pay across the board. If you flew a 757 that was configured for 50 seats would it still be great pay at 100/hr? In the early days pay was based on speed of the aircraft, then as jets came along it was weight. Now that we are in the financial era of aviation maybe we should get paid based upon total revenue the flight brings in? Or maybe a percentage of the cost to operate the flight (besides wages) as discussed above?

The longevity payscale is hurting everyone. If pilots could go from airline to airline without worrying about starting at base pay it would force the airlines to create a better environment to retain pilots.
Reply
Old 07-24-2009 | 11:34 AM
  #323  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Mason32
The 1500 included ALL costs associated with the flight... pro-rated rampers and gate agents included.
NOT true.

That figure is the DIRECT operating cost and does not include many items that alter the actual cost of a pirticular flight.
Reply
Old 07-24-2009 | 12:12 PM
  #324  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
From: Reclined
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
NOT true.

That figure is the DIRECT operating cost and does not include many items that alter the actual cost of a pirticular flight.
Dig a little deeper.... Direct operating costs included all of that stuff.

It did not include the management, advertising, training dept or anything else... but it did include anybody who touched the plane, the passengers, or their tickets.... since they were DIRECTLY involved with the operation; proratred of course.

Unless they changed how they calculate and list it.......
Reply
Old 07-24-2009 | 01:04 PM
  #325  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Mason32
Dig a little deeper.... Direct operating costs included all of that stuff.

It did not include the management, advertising, training dept or anything else... but it did include anybody who touched the plane, the passengers, or their tickets.... since they were DIRECTLY involved with the operation; proratred of course.

Unless they changed how they calculate and list it.......
That's my point exactly, so here's my shovel.

There are other costs involved even beyond those you admit aren't part of the equation to make this figure relatively useless like financing issues, so for all practical purposes refrencing this is pointless.
Reply
Old 07-24-2009 | 02:38 PM
  #326  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
From: Reclined
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
That's my point exactly, so here's my shovel.

There are other costs involved even beyond those you admit aren't part of the equation to make this figure relatively useless like financing issues, so for all practical purposes refrencing this is pointless.
financing is part of the direct costs of operating the flight.

all of the administration, administrative costs, training, advertising and stuff like that is not part of the figure. If it directly relates to the aircraft, it IS part of that number. At least it used to be. Ask a friendly station manager next time you have the chance.... that number covers a ton of things... just as it also DOESN'T cover a ton of other things... but if you have that number, and have your fee for departure rate, you know more than most.
Reply
Old 07-24-2009 | 02:40 PM
  #327  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
From: Reclined
Default

Hey, I hear Eagle is ditching their kitbags within the year... going to go to an aircraft library concept with an outside contractor responsible to update all onboard manuals.... cool idea, hope it works and catches on... I hate lugging mine around.
Reply
Old 07-24-2009 | 02:53 PM
  #328  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Mason32
financing is part of the direct costs of operating the flight.

all of the administration, administrative costs, training, advertising and stuff like that is not part of the figure. If it directly relates to the aircraft, it IS part of that number. At least it used to be. Ask a friendly station manager next time you have the chance.... that number covers a ton of things... just as it also DOESN'T cover a ton of other things... but if you have that number, and have your fee for departure rate, you know more than most.
You're info is incorrect, but believe what you want. BTW, I've been led astray by more then one station manager before.

At any rate you asserted that ALL (see original post) costs are involved with this figure on the release and that simply isn't true. That was what I said in my original post to your statement and it still stands.
Reply
Old 07-24-2009 | 03:02 PM
  #329  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
From: Reclined
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
You're info is incorrect, but believe what you want. BTW, I've been led astray by more then one station manager before.

At any rate you asserted that ALL (see original post) costs are involved with this figure on the release and that simply isn't true. That was what I said in my original post to your statement and it still stands.

Perhaps "All costs associated with the flight" wasn't clear enough...
but, I thought I clarified it well after that....
Reply
Old 07-24-2009 | 03:21 PM
  #330  
AmericanEagleFO's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: ATR
Default

Originally Posted by Mason32
Hey, I hear Eagle is ditching their kitbags within the year... going to go to an aircraft library concept with an outside contractor responsible to update all onboard manuals.... cool idea, hope it works and catches on... I hate lugging mine around.
Where did you hear this? I hope you're right but I haven't heard anything about this. What would happen to trip books? I would see people using charts less.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mason32
Regional
277
07-27-2010 06:01 PM
JNYVEGAS
Cargo
34
01-30-2009 09:21 PM
FlyinSunset1
Major
14
01-28-2009 08:49 PM
PIPErdrvr
Regional
11
11-22-2008 05:45 PM
ChickenFlight
Regional
2
09-11-2008 01:14 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices