Make ATP retroactive?
08-05-2009 | 09:02 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
From: E-190 Leftist
Make ATP retroactive?
So here's a question I've been pondering for a few days. Should the new proposed rule requiring an ATP and 1500 hours include a retroactive requirement? More specifically, should airlines be required to train First Officers already employed and issue them ATPs? Perhaps they would only be required to do so once the First Officer reaches ATP minimums - if they are not there at the time of rule issuance.
I see one huge advantage for pilots: a free ATP if you're already employed at an airline.
And I see one disadvantage: another training event at which your certificate is on the line.
Thoughts? Suggestions? Preferences?
I'd rather keep this forum focused on the retroactive question instead of the validity of the ATP and 1500 hr requirement, since that's already a pretty extensive thread. Thanks.
I see one huge advantage for pilots: a free ATP if you're already employed at an airline.
And I see one disadvantage: another training event at which your certificate is on the line.
Thoughts? Suggestions? Preferences?
I'd rather keep this forum focused on the retroactive question instead of the validity of the ATP and 1500 hr requirement, since that's already a pretty extensive thread. Thanks.
08-05-2009 | 10:53 PM
#2
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 999
Likes: 0
1) Its pretty much a non issue because anyone currently employed will have 1500 hrs in 3 years.
2) An ATP is just a type ride. At many airlines, FO's and captains pretty much do the same maneuvers and approaches. The only difference would be learning the callouts.
At the time when the ATP is required, EVERYONE should be an ATP if they work 121. There will be plenty of time to prepare and get certs done. I think the issue should be that anyone working the line for 121 should have an ATP, not, anyone hired should have an ATP.
The difference is that a new hire would need the time to qualify, but could potentially take the ATP/Type ride at the conclusion of sim training.
2) An ATP is just a type ride. At many airlines, FO's and captains pretty much do the same maneuvers and approaches. The only difference would be learning the callouts.
At the time when the ATP is required, EVERYONE should be an ATP if they work 121. There will be plenty of time to prepare and get certs done. I think the issue should be that anyone working the line for 121 should have an ATP, not, anyone hired should have an ATP.
The difference is that a new hire would need the time to qualify, but could potentially take the ATP/Type ride at the conclusion of sim training.
08-06-2009 | 12:14 AM
#3
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
This is a moot point because you are going to have to take the ride at some point in time anyway. Unless, of course, one plans on retiring as an FO at a regional which I don't think many do.
08-06-2009 | 02:14 AM
#4
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
From: MD80
I hope this thing passes so that the pilot shortage will be expedited. There is no way somone would want to invest time and money for this bus driving job up in the air. Kids, if you are reading this. It's not too late, take that 50K check from dad for embry dribble or flight training and use it for Law school or become a doctor so that you will make more starting out than I will after a decade of take off and landings. That's all
08-06-2009 | 03:25 AM
#5
Doing One Pilot's Job
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,883
Likes: 119
If Congress really was intent on improving safety, they'd require all airline pilots to have an ATP and be fully type rated in the airplane they operate...and they'd give airlines 12 months to make sure all their pilots meet this standard.
Joint ATP/type rides are given all the time and if you can pass a 121 FO PC check then you won't have any problem with an upgrade ride...they aren't exactly difficult.
Joint ATP/type rides are given all the time and if you can pass a 121 FO PC check then you won't have any problem with an upgrade ride...they aren't exactly difficult.
08-06-2009 | 04:03 AM
#6
Moderator
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,634
Likes: 0
From: Tiki bar
If Congress really was intent on improving safety, they'd require all airline pilots to have an ATP and be fully type rated in the airplane they operate...and they'd give airlines 12 months to make sure all their pilots meet this standard.
Joint ATP/type rides are given all the time and if you can pass a 121 FO PC check then you won't have any problem with an upgrade ride...they aren't exactly difficult.
Joint ATP/type rides are given all the time and if you can pass a 121 FO PC check then you won't have any problem with an upgrade ride...they aren't exactly difficult.
The airline should be responsible for your ATP ride on your next recurrent. They way the bill looks right now, they are allowing 3 years for everyone already flying to be in compliance.
08-06-2009 | 04:34 AM
#7
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,105
Likes: 0
From: Left Seat
If Congress really was intent on improving safety, they'd require all airline pilots to have an ATP and be fully type rated in the airplane they operate...and they'd give airlines 12 months to make sure all their pilots meet this standard.
Joint ATP/type rides are given all the time and if you can pass a 121 FO PC check then you won't have any problem with an upgrade ride...they aren't exactly difficult.
Joint ATP/type rides are given all the time and if you can pass a 121 FO PC check then you won't have any problem with an upgrade ride...they aren't exactly difficult.
08-06-2009 | 05:23 AM
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 876
Likes: 0
From: Captain, CRJ-200, ASA
If Congress really was intent on improving safety, they'd require all airline pilots to have an ATP and be fully type rated in the airplane they operate...and they'd give airlines 12 months to make sure all their pilots meet this standard.
Joint ATP/type rides are given all the time and if you can pass a 121 FO PC check then you won't have any problem with an upgrade ride...they aren't exactly difficult.
Joint ATP/type rides are given all the time and if you can pass a 121 FO PC check then you won't have any problem with an upgrade ride...they aren't exactly difficult.
I expect to see a lot of talk and very little action on this issue. They'll require "scientific studies" and committee reports. If the minimums are actually raised, I would expect it to effect all new hires going forward. It would be time consuming and expensive to make it retroactive.
08-06-2009 | 05:41 AM
#9
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,280
Likes: 34
From: Middle Seat
If Congress really was intent on improving safety, they'd require all airline pilots to have an ATP and be fully type rated in the airplane they operate...and they'd give airlines 12 months to make sure all their pilots meet this standard.
Joint ATP/type rides are given all the time and if you can pass a 121 FO PC check then you won't have any problem with an upgrade ride...they aren't exactly difficult.
Joint ATP/type rides are given all the time and if you can pass a 121 FO PC check then you won't have any problem with an upgrade ride...they aren't exactly difficult.
08-06-2009 | 05:49 AM
#10
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
From: ATL
I hope this thing passes so that the pilot shortage will be expedited. There is no way somone would want to invest time and money for this bus driving job up in the air. Kids, if you are reading this. It's not too late, take that 50K check from dad for embry dribble or flight training and use it for Law school or become a doctor so that you will make more starting out than I will after a decade of take off and landings. That's all
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
