Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Colgan, union differ on cause of fatal crash >

Colgan, union differ on cause of fatal crash

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Colgan, union differ on cause of fatal crash

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-15-2009, 02:15 PM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
mooney's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: CL-65 captain
Posts: 2,244
Default

Originally Posted by Hot Rod Wannabe View Post
Think about the A/C as well. The profile was being followed, but loss of sit awarness was key. Everyone is going to slam the pilots, and some blame is deserved. But don't forget the environment as well. Severe Icing forecast and SLD was present. The co-pilot was jabbering like a monkey about the ice build up. If the had all ice protection on and they were still picking up ice, then it was SLD period. In any event it should have been, "get the heck" out of there. The captian didn't notice that the A/C slowed because the auto pilot had trimmed the airplane tail to a maximum nose up position and when the pilots received the shaker the capt slammed the throttles forward producing a 20 degree nose up... remember the auto pilot trimmed max nose up based on power settings. Then the airplaned stalled probably tucked a wing due to ice again and well the rest we know. It is easy to second guess but situationally the crew was way behind and it bit them. I'm sure the new legislation will all make us safer in the end. I'm sure 1500 hours will make all pilots bullet proof and able to save all passengers from terrible accidents from ever happening. I wonder why ALPA signed off on the new HR 3371 so fast?
I'm guessing that the thrust vector of a high-wing Q400 and T-tail above the slipstream should pitch the nose DOWN with the addition of power, just as it does with high-mounted CRJ engines. Can anyone who flies it verify it pitches UP?
mooney is offline  
Old 12-15-2009, 05:04 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: e190
Posts: 929
Default

Its not any one thing that caused the accident but the collective cluster that is Colgans operation that caused the accident. The deck was stacked against the crew from the get go. Colgan and a few other companies skate by with just the minimum and when it goes TU everyone looks at each other like they are surprised.

The company truly is one of the worst i have seen and heard of in this industry. It isnt a small airline anymore and it has been a long time coming that they got their act together.
newarkblows is offline  
Old 12-15-2009, 05:14 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: B757F CA
Posts: 408
Default

Yep, the training department at Colgan is really lacking. What's even more shocking, if true, is that the moron that ran it pre-accident has been hired by the FAA! Can anyone confirm this?
IQuitEagle is offline  
Old 12-15-2009, 05:52 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
drummerguy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: SF340 LCA
Posts: 112
Default

its true, dm works for the faa now
drummerguy is offline  
Old 12-15-2009, 06:37 PM
  #35  
Day puke
 
FlyJSH's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Out.
Posts: 3,865
Default

those who can't, regulate
FlyJSH is offline  
Old 12-15-2009, 07:23 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
AxialFlow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 519
Default

Originally Posted by Purpleanga View Post
Ok and on the other hand Colgan hired a squeaky clean FO CFI which anyone would have hired that raised the flaps at 20 degrees pitch up during a stall when she should have been beating on the guy severly to get the nose over to pick up airspeed.
proper procedure would have been to call out the decreasing airspeed and add power to avoid the stall in the first place.
AxialFlow is offline  
Old 12-15-2009, 07:25 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
AxialFlow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 519
Default

Originally Posted by Cycle Pilot View Post
The DFDR shows the position of the yoke during the flight and is displayed on the video. The video obviously shows that he pulled back on the yoke.
Or is it the yoke coming to the full aft position due to the full nose up trim after the autopilot kicks off?
AxialFlow is offline  
Old 12-15-2009, 07:28 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
AxialFlow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 519
Default

Originally Posted by captjns View Post
And if these two were paid, let's say $200.00 an hour, would the out come be different. Doubtful.
If Colgan was paying pilots $200.00/hr, they wouldn't be hiring pilots with 500 hrs.
AxialFlow is offline  
Old 12-15-2009, 07:38 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 776
Default

Originally Posted by newarkblows View Post
Its not any one thing that caused the accident but the collective cluster that is Colgans operation that caused the accident. The deck was stacked against the crew from the get go. Colgan and a few other companies skate by with just the minimum and when it goes TU everyone looks at each other like they are surprised.

The company truly is one of the worst i have seen and heard of in this industry. It isnt a small airline anymore and it has been a long time coming that they got their act together.
Elaborate.
SmitteyB is offline  
Old 12-15-2009, 07:41 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
AxialFlow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 519
Default

On fatigue, Colgan said that Shaw should not have commuted from Washington State the night before the flight and instead should have stayed in a Newark hotel.
"Commuter housing in Newark would have cost Shaw $250 a month, or 20 percent of her gross salary," the pilots union said. "That coupled with the already alarmingly low salary gave her few options but to live with her parents and complete a transcontinental commute."
A huge case for pay raises at the regional level.
AxialFlow is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
usmc-sgt
Regional
44
03-11-2012 02:04 PM
mjarosz
Regional
128
08-26-2010 04:42 AM
FlyJSH
Regional
19
08-11-2010 03:29 PM
joel payne
Regional
7
02-24-2009 06:54 AM
whtever
Regional
109
12-15-2008 09:12 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices