Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Lynx Feb 5th

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-07-2010 | 07:31 AM
  #21  
iPilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by RAH RAH REE
People need to remember that Republics CBA was negotiated before they even had 70 seaters. The 70 seaters were just a pipe dream and 190s? Not even on the radar. Personally I'm surprised the negotiating committee even had the forethought to put in place 75-99 seat rates.

How many turboprop regionals have actually have Airbus rates? Some things you just dont expect.
That's why you just have pay rates for the airplanes you currently have or plan to have in the immediate future. Just setting blanket rates with seats can really open you up to anything.
Reply
Old 02-07-2010 | 08:24 AM
  #22  
Vegaspilot's Avatar
Gets Tue/Wed and Sat Off
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Waldo11
I certainly wouldn't wish this on any of my former Lynx friends. I think the last thing any of them want is anything to do with RAH. I for one hope they can move on to other companies that will treat them with the respect they deserve and pay them at the professional rate they exhibit.
Originally Posted by HawkerJet
Thanks for the thoughts Waldo, good flying with you though brief.

Lets say we do get recalled to RAH, will it be in Denver? Will the Midwest pilots get the 190's in MKE? Or will we all be able to bid into the system as our seniority permits? If it's the last, commuting for an RJ job even at your pay rates in not acceptable. I will probably eat my words but no thanks.
Thanks Waldo, it was a pleasure working with you (and all the Lynx guys) while it lasted. I'm glad you were able to move on before this came down. Hawker...when/if we do get recalled, my guess is it will be for whatever aircraft has vacancies and you will have to bid for what bases are available in class.

I agree with you both...I really never wanted anything to do with RAH and Denver was about as far as I was willing to commute for a regional. Unless something amazing happens with the SLI (highly doubtful), I most likely won't bother accepting the recall (if it comes) as I'd rather wait for something better.
Reply
Old 02-07-2010 | 11:22 AM
  #23  
atpcliff's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,215
Likes: 0
From: Capt
Default

Hi.

Lynx...Jobs

Captains:
CREW
Available Positions Through Crew Resources Worldwide

PARC
Parc Aviation Recruitment and Resourcing

airBaltic
Vacancies
Note: EU citizens only

directpersonnel.com had some ATR 72 jobs (more ATR jobs various places)
http://www.directpersonnel.com

India
India Air Travel, Air Tickets Online Booking, India Airfare Online Booking, Domestic Airline in India

FOs:
Samar Air in Tajikistan
coffeelovesmilk.com | pilot jobs worldwide

Compass
Eagle
Air WI

cliff
NBO
Reply
Old 02-07-2010 | 06:46 PM
  #24  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Waldo11
I certainly wouldn't wish this on any of my former Lynx friends. I think the last thing any of them want is anything to do with RAH. I for one hope they can move on to other companies that will treat them with the respect they deserve and pay them at the professional rate they exhibit.
You are Aware that Lynx Captains fly a 70 seat airplane for less than RAH's 37 seat rate....Why make this so personal, I'm embarrassed to be a pilot when I look on this forum because pilots seem like such whiny b#$%'s. It's freakin business. Mainline pilots who were too good to fly small planes 30 years ago started this mess and young pilots trying to find a reasonable job are now blamed for it, whine about that.
Reply
Old 02-07-2010 | 07:07 PM
  #25  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP
XJT's 2004 CBA was negotiated 1. after RAH's 2003 CBA and 2. while you were the exclusive jet operator for CAL. RAH's CBA was negotiated with 1. a looming threat for an alter-ego Republic Airlines and 2. months after Mesa signed their abortion of a 2003 CBA. Since then, you guys also got a contract extension that extended those payrates as you spooled up branded/charter ops.
If RAH's 2003 CBA was negotiated after Mesa's 2003 CBA, wasn't XJT's 2004 CBA also negotiated after Mesa? And speaking of negotiating under a looming threat of an alter ego airline, Mesa actually negotiated that "abortion" 2003 CBA while fighting an alter ego airline rather than just the threat of one. Also, the exclusivity of being CAL's jet operator was still under the old CPA that allowed CAL to do what they did XJT, in other words, there wasn't much leverage of being CAL's exlucisive jet operator because all the traps of the old CPA were known at the time. Lastly, the XJT contract extension pay rates never materialized since the concessions took place before the pay raises kicked in, which were negotiated under great uncertainty for the company, by the way.

Originally Posted by RAH RAH REE
People need to remember that Republics CBA was negotiated before they even had 70 seaters. The 70 seaters were just a pipe dream and 190s? Not even on the radar. Personally I'm surprised the negotiating committee even had the forethought to put in place 75-99 seat rates.

How many turboprop regionals have actually have Airbus rates? Some things you just dont expect.
I actually think that this is opposite of having forethought. You never want to give away leverage like this. Forethought would have been getting language in the contract that says if the company acquires a new type, there is a time limit to negotiate pay rates for said aircraft or otherwise it goes to binding arbitration. I know others like SKW has pay rates for larger aircraft (that was another part of the deal they wanted with XJT, a negotiated pay rate for larger aircraft even though there were no current plans for them) because there is not as much pressure on the company as opposed to the aircraft being delivered and sitting somewhere while the union and company negotiate for a proper pay rate.

Its very shortsighted to negotiate these types of things ahead of time.
Reply
Old 02-07-2010 | 07:38 PM
  #26  
NoStep's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
From: Missionary
Default

Originally Posted by crazy pills
You are Aware that Lynx Captains fly a 70 seat airplane for less than RAH's 37 seat rate....Why make this so personal, I'm embarrassed to be a pilot when I look on this forum because pilots seem like such whiny b#$%'s. It's freakin business. Mainline pilots who were too good to fly small planes 30 years ago started this mess and young pilots trying to find a reasonable job are now blamed for it, whine about that.
Awesome 1st post!! (clap, clap)
If these forums embarass your obviously pious feelers, there are other venues.
Since you're new here, alot of pilots treat this forum like the crew lounge, where they can get info, rumors, blow off steam, b.s., etc.

The people running some regionals now, (Rev BB, J.O., Hulas, to name a few) saw Frank Lorenzo as a role model instead of Herb Kelliher and it's hard to NOT take things personally when your livelihood hangs in the balance. You do understand that, right? Ya, it's "freakin' business", and alot of crews are getting "freak"-ed by Republic.

btw,
Mainline pilots DID fly small planes 30 years ago, (new-hires at Pan Am started in small aircraft and worked up to the panel on the 727) Also, when the regional jet arrived, those mainline pilots you refer to wanted them flown for mainline rates, but the companies wanted no part of that! They gave up scope for promises that were broken before the ink dried on the paperwork. But, hey...it's "freakin' business"!!
Reply
Old 02-08-2010 | 04:57 AM
  #27  
Dirty Rat's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by crazy pills
You are Aware that Lynx Captains fly a 70 seat airplane for less than RAH's 37 seat rate....Why make this so personal, I'm embarrassed to be a pilot when I look on this forum because pilots seem like such whiny b#$%'s. It's freakin business. Mainline pilots who were too good to fly small planes 30 years ago started this mess and young pilots trying to find a reasonable job are now blamed for it, whine about that.
I wasn't to good to fly worn out Turbo Props and pistons twins 30 years ago. I flew for thousands of hours in them to build time and experience where I could get a job flying bigger and better equipment. Up until the mid 90's, you had to have around 5,000 hours to even be considered for a National or Major. Twenty years later, a regional run by a complete and total scumbag, buys my company, guts it, and locks me out of a job and replaces me with willing minions who undercut not just me, but the entire industry. Oh well, back to filling for unemployment.
Reply
Old 02-08-2010 | 07:51 AM
  #28  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by NoStep
Awesome 1st post!! (clap, clap)
If these forums embarass your obviously pious feelers, there are other venues.
Since you're new here, alot of pilots treat this forum like the crew lounge, where they can get info, rumors, blow off steam, b.s., etc.

The people running some regionals now, (Rev BB, J.O., Hulas, to name a few) saw Frank Lorenzo as a role model instead of Herb Kelliher and it's hard to NOT take things personally when your livelihood hangs in the balance. You do understand that, right? Ya, it's "freakin' business", and alot of crews are getting "freak"-ed by Republic.

btw,
Mainline pilots DID fly small planes 30 years ago, (new-hires at Pan Am started in small aircraft and worked up to the panel on the 727) Also, when the regional jet arrived, those mainline pilots you refer to wanted them flown for mainline rates, but the companies wanted no part of that! They gave up scope for promises that were broken before the ink dried on the paperwork. But, hey...it's "freakin' business"!!
Ok, so what do you have to say about Lynx pay rates compared to RAH?

They ( mainline pilots) gave up scope for more $$$. Greed let the first contract carrier get it's foot in the door. People want to go around and blame people for not being unified when that unity was broken for more $$$, I guess thats their freakin business though.
Reply
Old 02-08-2010 | 08:53 AM
  #29  
HawkerJet's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by crazy pills
Ok, so what do you have to say about Lynx pay rates compared to RAH?

They ( mainline pilots) gave up scope for more $$$. Greed let the first contract carrier get it's foot in the door. People want to go around and blame people for not being unified when that unity was broken for more $$$, I guess thats their freakin business though.
We were told that the pay rates were on paper only and would change to Horizon Q400 rates when certification was complete, never happened.

When FAH filed chapter 11, everyone at F9/L4 took pay cuts, we now were the lowest paid Q400 pilots in the world.

We were told that upon exiting bankruptcy we would get our pay restored, BB put an end to that when RAH took over, thanks.
Reply
Old 02-08-2010 | 12:08 PM
  #30  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by HawkerJet
We were told that the pay rates were on paper only and would change to Horizon Q400 rates when certification was complete, never happened.

When FAH filed chapter 11, everyone at F9/L4 took pay cuts, we now were the lowest paid Q400 pilots in the world.

We were told that upon exiting bankruptcy we would get our pay restored, BB put an end to that when RAH took over, thanks.
Without a pilot contract, they could have told you anything and it wouldn't have meant much.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
airdett
Part 135
11
07-10-2009 04:47 AM
SurferLucas
Part 135
12
07-03-2009 05:49 AM
lear 31 pilot
Regional
6
03-13-2009 11:02 AM
Ozpilot414
Regional
5
02-17-2009 06:48 PM
viperdriver
Cargo
1
01-22-2009 03:25 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices